Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

PRO is currently experiencing an outage. Some documents and records may not be available on PRO momentarily. We apologize for the inconvenience and are working to restore full access.

Permit Number: T15CM06441
Parcel: 123152670

Address:
1019 E LEE ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING-WALKTHRU

Permit Number - T15CM06441
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING-WALKTHRU
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/16/2015 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Approved P&DS TRANSMITTAL


FROM: David Rivera, Principal Planner

TRANSMITTAL: January 7, 2013

ADDRESS: 1019 E Lee Street

ACTIVITY NUMBER: T15CM06441

PROJECT: Fire Damage repair, Add addition to rear of the dwelling, extend front porch

COMMENTS: the following comments are relative to an application for a Design Development Option (DDO) (UDC 3.11.1).


This site is located in the R-2 zone (UDC 4.7.9). A single-family residence (SFR) is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2). See Use-Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.6, .9 & .10.


The minimum setback is the greater of six (6) feet, or two-thirds (2/3) the height of the structure's wall facing each interior property line (Table 6.3-2.A).

01. Comment: Owner proposes to construct an addition attached to the rear of the dwelling. The proposed building setbacks are 7.5'. The required setback based on the 11'-6" wall height adjacent to the East and West property lines requires a 7'-8" building setbacks.

The minimum setback to the front street perimeter property line is the greater of twenty (20) feet, or one and one-half (1 ½) the height of the proposed wall ((UDC 6.4.5.C.1.a).


02. Comment: the owner proposes to extend the front porch to the east and west property lines. The existing porch is non-conforming for the front street \building setback. The proposes extension of the porch will also be noncompliant based on the existing setback of 15.5'
09/16/2015 DAVID RIVERA NPPO REVIEW Passed
11/03/2015 PAUL BAUGHMAN ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
11/03/2015 KEN VAN KARSEN BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL REVIEW Needs Review