Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO
Permit Number - T15CM06068
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/16/2015 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: T15CM06068 10610 E. Escalante Residential (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 22, 2015 The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. Zoning cannot approve the building plans until grading plan Dp15-0149 has been approved. Provide copies of the approved lot split documents from 2013 with your next submittal. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 10/16/2015 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | DATE: September 25, 2015 DUE DATE: October 19, 2015 SUBJECT: Proposed Residences for Pima 6600 LLC TO: George Edward Holguin, RE LOCATION: 10610 E Escalante Road REVIEWERS: Paul Baughman, PE, CFM ACTIVITY: T15CM06068 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. Normally floodplain and erosion hazard setback limits would need to be delineated by the applicant based on AM 2-06.4.8I. However, since the proposed structure and fill slopes are significantly setback both horizontally and vertically from the wash bottom, delineation is not being requested as a part of this submittal. If future development encroaches further into the flood prone area, delineation may still be required. Please note that the comments from DP15-150 have been copied into this comment memo due to inclusion of these pages in this building permit package. The following items need to be addressed: 1) Per AM 2-06.2.3 this is a related review and the development plan package, DP15-0149, will need to be approved prior to or concurrently with approval of this activity number T15CM06068. 2) Per AM 2-06.4.9N2 please show how roof drainage and drainage upstream of the site wall and fill pad is being diverted around the structure. This involves the need for additional flow arrows, call outs of keynote 3 and minimum percent slope. Defining a swale using proposed contours may also be needed to clearly show proposed drainage patterns. 3) Per AM 2-06.4.1 please add the email address and phone number for the owner to the plans. 4) Per AM 2-06.4.2D the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx) should be filled in. 5) Per AM 2-06.4.3 please provide the relevant case numbers adjacent to the title block. This would include T15CM06068 and DP15-0149. 6) Per UDC 5.2.6B, C and D the document that contains the "dedicated natural area" needs to be recorded with the Pima County Recorder as a deed-restricted portion of the lot in favor of the City of Tucson. Please provide recording information on plan after addressing other comments. 7) Per TSM 9-01.3.1 the ACS calculation should be revised to only divide by the area that is not a dedicated natural area. The total lot area is only used when referencing Table 5.2.1: Development Standards Based on Average Cross Slope per UDC 5.2.5B. Please note that the "Sum of the lengths (L) of all contour lines" (ie. 3770) appears to only include lengths from the area to be disturbed. This would only be used if the ACS for the disturbable area was being calculated and the disturbable area was used for the A value. This would have the 1.413 acre area used instead of the 3.30645 acre area. The ACS would then be 11.045 in the area to be disturbed. Then UDC Section 5.2.5B2b would allow up to 80% disturbance of the remaining parcel to be developed. The Maximum Grading Percent would be 34.19 percent of the entire 3.306 acre area. Since this allows 49240 square feet of disturbance, the proposed 16459 square feet of proposed gradable area is still acceptable. Please update calculations and assumptions for HDZ zone. 8) The maximum height is listed as 30 in the HDZ notes on sheet HDZ -1. Per UDC 5.2.7A this maximum height is for nonresidential. Please clarify if this is a non-residential structure (ie. Commercial). The HDZ note shows a 20" (inch) proposed. Please update. Please note that residential allows up to 24' (feet) in height. 9) There is a discrepancy between the cut and fill quantities on sheet HDZ-1 (Cut 286 CY Fill 298 CY) and sheet HDZ-2 (Cut 514 CY Fill 403). Please recalculate the cut and fill quantities and update both sheets HDZ-1 and HDZ-2 accordingly. 10) Per AM 2-06.4.4B please show the Pantano Wash in the project location map in the upper right corner on sheet HDZ-1. 11) Per AM 2-06.4.5 please provide a sheet index on sheet HDZ-1. 12) Per AM 2-06.4.7B2 please add the following note, "The developer, any successors and assigns, will hold the City of Tucson, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims for damages related to the use of this development as shown hereon, now and in the future, by reason of flooding, flowage, erosion, or damage caused by water, whether surface flood or rainfall." 13) Per AM 2-06.4.7B3 please add the following note, "Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this site plan." 14) Per AM 2-06.4.7D please add the following note, "Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public." 15) Per AM 2-06.4.7E5 please add the following note, "Sewerage disposal will be by a private individual disposal system. Conceptual approval by the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality for a private individual system will be obtained prior to approval of the development package document." If you have any comments questions or wish to discuss new information, please call or email me at 520-837-5007 or paul.baughman@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 10/16/2015 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Needs Review | Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply |
| 10/19/2015 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLEASE INDICATE ON THE SITE PLAN THE LOCATION OF THE NEAREST FIRE HYDRANT AND PLEASE OBTAIN FROM THE WATER COMPANY IF THE FIRE HYDRANT CAN MEET 1750 GPM FOR 2HOURS DURATION AT 20PSI RESIDUAL PRESSURE. |
| 10/21/2015 | CLAYTON TREVILLYAN | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS Date: 10-26-15 Activity: T15CM06068 Address: 10610 E Escalante Applicant: Pima 6600 LLC This letter reflects comments to be addressed. The purpose of this review is to verify compliance to the 2012 International Residential Code with local amendments. In order to facilitate a shorter back check time, we request that you please provide two complete sets of revised plans and calculations, along with a written response to each of the noted items indicating action taken. Other comment references may be derived from additional codes and standards adopted by The City of Tucson. All features have been checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided for review. All portions of this project are assumed to meet other departmental requirements, conditions, and concerns before permit approval. Sheet CVR 1. Specify all switches, receptacles, and controls within 15 to 48 inches of the floor (To include thermostat controls), ANSI A117.1, 1003.9. Sheet CVR, E2: 2. Please correct the outdoor lighting calculation, OLC 3.1.2. Figures indicate the proposed lot is 303 acres in size. 3. Provide cut sheets for all FCO fixtures showing the angle of cutoff, light emissions and fixture wattage. All other fixtures are assumed to be unshielded (non-FCO style) 104.2. Sheet A1: 4. Provide 30 inch openings (min. 2'8" door) to bathrooms located on the accessible route, ANSI A117.1, 1003.5.2.1. 5. Indicate safety glazing in hazardous locations, R308.4. Refer to window over master bathtub and adjacent to front door. Sheet A1, A7: 6. Specify a "U" factor and solar heat gain coefficient of the windows and doors that meets or exceeds the requirements of N1102.1. The simplified prescribed energy value for climate zone 2B glazing is U=0.40 and skylights is U=0.65, the default SHGC is 0.25. Sheet A2: 7. Condensation control is required for the unvented roof assembly method. Specify an air-impermeable rigid insulation material sealed tight to the roof sheathing (above or below) or spray applied closed cell foam to a minimum value of R5, R806.5. Sheet S2: 8. Provide structural calculations for wood studs that exceed ten (10) feet in laterally unsupported height, Table R602.3(5). Sheet S3: 9. Please include wall hatching on all braced wall locations for plan view layout for consistency with elevation drawings. Refer to kitchen, fireplace and garage locations. 10. The maximum allowed distance between braced wall lines is sixty (60) feet, Table 602.10.1.3. Provide interior braced wall panels as necessary to kitchen and living room areas, Table 602.10.3(1). 11. Provide a minimum braced wall length to height ratio in accordance with Table 602.10.5. 12. The maximum allowable spacing between braced wall panels on a braced wall line is twenty (20) feet, Table 602.10.1.3. Sheet D2: 13. Please specify both dimensions of the proposed 2x ledgers supporting roof framing. 14. Indicate the proposed attachment of bearing ledgers supporting roof framing. Sheet E1: 15. The receptacle located in the master closet may not share the dedicated bathroom circuit, E3703.4. 16. GFCI protection is required for receptacles located in garage ceiling, kitchen and near the utility sink in the laundry room, E3902. Please provide consistent notation for these locations as indicated elsewhere on the plans such as the bathroom. 17. Please provide smoke detectors in all hallways leading to sleeping rooms, R314. 18. Laundry rooms require at least one 20-amp circuit that shall serve no other outlets, E3703.3, 3901.8. 19. Peninsula counter tops with a long dimension of 24" and a short dimension of 12" or greater shall have at least one receptacle, E3901.4.2/3. Note: receptacles located below a counter where the countertop extends more than 6" beyond its support base, may not be counted as receptacles serving the counter area, E3901.4.5 20. Indicate location of water heater disconnect switch, E4101.5. Sheet M1: 21. Provide whole-house mechanical ventilation, R303.4. 22. Please indicate the location of the condensate line discharge for the roof-mounted HVAC units, M1411.3. Note: plumbing vents may not be used for condensate discharge. 23. Show exhaust fan locations and capacity for kitchen venting to the exterior, R303.3, M1507. Sheet P3: 24. Clarify the proposed fixture unit values specified on the water distribution calculation. This needs to be reconciled with the values indicated on the fixture unit table. 25. Please correct the word 'existing' to 'proposed' on the fixture unit table or another equivalent word reflecting fixtures not yet installed. 26. The City of Tucson adopted the 2012 IRC on 1/01/2013. Please correct references to the 2006 UPC in the general notes. If you have any questions please contact: Clayton Trevillyan, CBO 520.837.4913 Clayton.Trevillyan@tucsonaz.gov Residential Plan Review |