Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T15CM06060
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/04/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET G1.0; CODE REVIEW (FIRE PROTECTION): SECTION 903.2.7 IS REFERENCED FOR FIRE PROTECTION. PLEASE REVISE THE SECTION REFERENCE (903.2.7 IS FOR MERCANTILE OCCUPANCY GROUP). 2. SHEET G1.0; CODE REVIEW (FIRE ALARM): SECTION 907.2.7 IS REFERENCED FOR FIRE ALARMS. PLEASE REVISE THE SECTION REFERENCE (907.2.7 IS FOR MERCANTILE OCCUPANCY GROUP). 3. SHEET G1.0; CODE REVIEW (EXIT SIGNS): SECTION 1011.1.3 IS REFERENCED FOR NON-ILLUMINATED EXIT SIGNS. PLEASE REVISE THE SECTION REFERENCE. THE IBC SECTION 1011.3 REQUIRES EXIT SIGNS TO BE INTERNALLY OR EXTERNALLY ILLUMINATED. PLEASE REVISE SHEET G1.0 AND ANY SPECIFICATIONS AS REQUIRED. 4. SHEET G1.0; CODE REVIEW (CORRIDOR FIRE RESISTANCE): TABLE 1017.7 IS REFERENCED FOR THE CORRIDOR FIRE RESISTANCE RATING. PLEASE REVISE THE SECTION REFERENCE, OR REMOVE THE NOTE. 5. SHEET G1.0; CODE REVIEW (PLUMBING REQUIREMENTS): INDICATE ON THE DRAWINGS THE LOCATION OF THE EXISTING TOILET FACILITIES AND THE MAXIMUM TRAVEL DISTANCE FROM THE NEW BUILDING TO THOSE FACILITIES. 6. SHEET G1.0; CODE REVIEW (PLUMBING REQUIREMENTS): THE WATER CLOSETS AND LAVATORIES REQUIRED MUST BE CALCULATED PER THE IBC SECTION 2902.1.1 AND TABLE 2902.1. ONE MEN'S AND ONE WOMEN'S WATER CLOSET AND LAVATORY MUST BE PROVIDED. PLEASE VERIFY ON THE DRAWINGS THESE REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. 7. SHEET G1.0; CODE REVIEW: PLEASE INDICATE ON THE DRAWINGS THE LOCATION OF THE REQUIRED DRINKING FOUNTAIN (HIGH/LOW OR SINGLE POINT OF USE) AND THE MAXIMUM TRAVEL DISTANCE FROM THE NEW BUILDING. 8. SHEET A1.0; FLOOR PLAN: PLEASE ADD ELEVATION INDICATOR 4/A2.0 AT THE WEST WALL OF THE PLAN. 9. SHEET S1.0 (NOTES); METAL BUILDING DRAWINGS (SHEET F2): THE FOUNDATION NOTES IN THE BUNGER STEEL DRAWINGS INDICATE AN ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE OF 2000 PSF, WHILE THE FOUNDATION NOTES ON SHEET S1.0 INDICATE 1500 PSF ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE. PLEASE COORDINATE. 10. SHEET S1.0 (NOTES); METAL BUILDING DRAWINGS (SHEET F2): THE CONCRETE NOTES IN THE BUNGER STEEL DRAWINGS INDICATE A 3000 PSI STRENGTH CONCRETE, WHILE THE CONCRETE NOTES ON SHEET S1.0 INDICATE 4000 PSI. PLEASE COORDINATE. 11. SHEET S1.0 (NOTES); METAL BUILDING DRAWINGS (SHEET F2): PLEASE ADD HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS (ASTM A325) TO THE STRUCTURAL STEEL NOTES ON SHEET S1.0. 12. GENERAL: TWO SETS OF THE PREFABRICATED METAL BUILDING STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS AND THE BUNGER STEEL DRAWINGS ARE REQUIRED. PLEASE PROVIDE. 13. GENERAL: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. THE BUNGER STEEL DRAWINGS MUST BE REVISED TO MEET THAT CRITERIA. PLEASE PROVIDE FULL SIZE DRAWINGS. 14. GENERAL: A PRESUMPTIVE ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE OF 1500 PSF IS ALLOWED BY THE CITY OF TUCSON WHEN THE FOOTING BEARS A MINIMUM OF 1'-6" BELOW FINISH GRADE. PLEASE REVISE THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS AND DRAWINGS AS REQUIRED. 15. SHEET F1 (BUNGER STEEL DRAWINGS); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 7): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A 2'-6" SQUARE X 12" THICK FOOTING FOR COLUMNS 1B THROUGH 1E AND 7B THROUGH 7E, WHILE THE FOUNDATION PLAN INDICATES FOOTING C/F2 (2'-0" SQUARE X 12" THICK). PLEASE COORDINATE. 16. SHEET F1 (BUNGER STEEL DRAWINGS); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 12): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A 2'-0" SQUARE X 12" THICK FOOTING FOR COLUMNS 1A, 1F, 7A, AND 7F, WHILE THE FOUNDATION PLAN INDICATES FOOTING B/F2 (2'-6" SQUARE X 12" THICK). PLEASE COORDINATE. 17. GENERAL: THE BUNGER STEEL DRAWINGS (DEFERRED SUBMITTAL) MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTION 107.3.4.1. THE DOCUMENTS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ARCHITECT) WHO SHALL REVIEW THEM AND FORWARD THEM TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WITH A NOTATION ON THE DRAWINGS INDICATING THAT THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND FOUND TO BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE TO THE DESIGN OF THE BUILDING. 18. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 01/05/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 12/08/2015 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Needs Review | Can not review until Development Plan has been approved. |
| 12/08/2015 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Needs Review | Can not review until Development package has been approved |
| 12/16/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 12/16/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 12/16/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 12/17/2015 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 12/22/2015 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Foundation Building Materials T15CM06060 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 22, 2015 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. It appears that the building plans match the development package, DP15-0144. Until the development package has been approved the building plans cannot be approved. 3. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 12/22/2015 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/20/2016 | EGALLET1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |