Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T15CM05730
Parcel: 138244030

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T15CM05730
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/19/2015 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Needs Review
08/24/2015 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Reqs Change PLEASE REMOVE ALL COMMENTS REGARDING THE OHIO BOARD OF BUILDING APPEALS. THE FIRE NOTES ON SHEET C0.10 DO NOT REFERENCE THE CORRECT CODE SECTION IN THE IFC.
09/02/2015 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. SHEET G0.1; CODE INFORMATION: PLEASE REVISE THE ELECTRICAL CODE TO THE 2011 NEC.
2. SHEET G0.1; CODE INFORMATION: PER THE IBC SECTION 504.2, THE ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT INDICATED IN TABLE 503 (40') MAY BE INCREASED BY 20' IF THE BUILDING IS EQUIPPED WITH AN APPROVED AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 903.3.1.1, THUS ALLOWING A 60' BUILDING HEIGHT. PLEASE PROVIDE THIS INFORMATION ON THE DRAWINGS.
3. SHEET G0.1; CODE INFORMATION: THE REFERENCE TO SECTION 507 FOR UNLIMITED BUILDING AREA PER THE OHIO BOARD OF BUILDING APPEALS CASE NO. 14-0257 IS NOT AN ACCEPTABLE APPEAL FOR UNLIMITED AREA IN THE STATE OF ARIZONA. THE OPEN PERIMETER DESCRIBED DOES NOT APPEAR TO APPLY TO THIS JOB. PLEASE VERIFY. PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE DRAWINGS PER THE IBC SECTION 507.3 TO VERIFY UNLIMITED BUILDING AREA IS ALLOWED.
4. SHEET G0.1; CODE INFORMATION: THE CHAPTER 10 REFERENCE INDICATES TABLE 1004.1.1 WAS USED TO DETERMINE THE OCCUPANT LOAD. PLEASE REVISE THE TABLE REFERENCE.
5. SHEET G0.1; CODE INFORMATION: THE SECTION 1016 REFERENCE INDICATES TABLE 1016.1 WAS USED TO DETERMINE THE TRAVEL DISTANCE. PLEASE REVISE THE TABLE REFERENCE.
6. SHEET G0.1; CODE INFORMATION: THE SECTION 1017 AND 1017.4 REFERENCES INDICATE CORRIDORS AND DEAD ENDS. PLEASE REVISE THE SECTION REFERENCES.
7. SHEET G0.1; CODE INFORMATION: CHAPTER 29 ON THE DRAWINGS INDICATES THERE ARE THREE FAMILY RESTROOMS. PLEASE VERIFY (ONLY TWO WERE LOCATED).
8. SHEET G0.1; CODE INFORMATION: CHAPTER 7 REFERENCES SECTION 707.2, EXCEPTION 9, FOR NOT REQUIRING A FIRE RATING FOR THE ELEVATOR HOISTWAY. PLEASE REVISE THE SECTION REFERENCE.
9. SHEET G0.1; FIRE RATINGS: WHILE THE CHAPTER 7 REFERENCE INDICATES NO FIRE RATING IS REQUIRED FOR THE ELEVATOR SHAFT ENCLOSURE, THE IBC SECTION 703.4 DISCUSSES SHAFT ENCLOSURE RATINGS. PLEASE VERIFY ON THIS SHEET THE ELEVATOR SHAFT FIRE RATING REQUIRED.
10. SHEET G0.1; CODE INFORMATION: PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE DRAWINGS CONCERNING THE REQUIRED FIRE RATED CONSTRUCTION FOR MEANS OF EGRESS STAIRWAYS PER THE IBC SECTIONS 713 AND 1022.
11. SHEET G0.1; CODE INFORMATION: PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE DRAWINGS CONCERNING THE REQUIRED TWO WAY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM PER THE IBC SECTION 1007.8.
12. SHEET S0.1; STRUCTURAL GENERAL NOTES (FOUNDATIONS): PLEASE PROVIDE THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR REVIEW.
13. SHEET A1.1a (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A3.3 (STAIR ONE SECTION 5): PER THE IBC SECTION 1009.9.3, USABLE SPACES UNDER INTERIOR STAIRS SHALL BE PROTECTED BY FIRE RESISTANCE RATED CONSTRUCTION. THE RESTROOM 110 UNDER STAIR ONE FROM THE MEZZANINE MUST BE PROTECTED. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE DRAWINGS CONCERNING THAT REQUIREMENT.
14. SHEET A1.4; ROOF PLAN: PLEASE PROVIDE SPOT ELEVATIONS ON THE ROOF PLAN, OR REFERENCE ANOTHER SHEET WITH THAT INFORMATION.
15. SHEET A1.6b; FLOOR FINISH PLAN: PLEASE INDICATE CERAMIC TILE FLOORING IN THE RESTROOM/JANITOR AREA.
16. SHEET A3.2; WALL TYPES PLAN: PLEASE VERIFY WALL TYPES AT THE STAIRS AND ELEVATOR MEET THE FIRE RATING REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC (PER PREVIOUS COMMENTS).
17. SHEET A3.2.1: FOR WALL TYPES REQUIRING A SPECIFIC FIRE RATING, PROVIDE A U.L. LISTING FOR THAT WALL ON THE PLANS.
18. SHEETS A5.1.1, A5.1.2, A5.1.3, AND A5.1.4: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE VARIOUS NOTES ON THIS SHEET.
19. SHEET A6.1; DOOR SCHEDULE: PLEASE VERIFY ALL DOORS IN RATED WALL ASSEMBLIES MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC TABLE 716.5.
20. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
09/03/2015 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Revise the site utility plan to show the location and size of the water meter, Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
2. Revise the site utility plan to show the location of the reduced pressure backflow assembly, specify the reduced pressure backflow assembly being installed, and indicate the size of the assembly. Reference: Chapter XXVII, Article V, Section 27-72, the Tucson Code, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf
3. Determine the domestic water demand to be seen by the water meter using the method shown in Appendix E, IPC 2012 and using Tables E103.3 (2) and E103.3 (3), IPC 2012.
09/04/2015 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 3/32-inch. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
2. Provide automatic faucets for the lavatories, dispensing a maximum of 0.25 gallons per metering cycle. Reference: Section 416.6, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
3. Verify that the pipe sizes called out for the flush valves will not result in water velocities greater than that recommended by the pipe manufacturer (e.g. limit the water velocity to less than 8 FPS for copper, PEX, or CPVC piping). At a minimum design flow rate of 25 GPM for a siphonic, flush-valve water closet, a 1" Type L copper pipe has a flow velocity of 9.7 FPS. Reference: Table 604.3, IPC 2012.
4. Verify that the thermostatic mixing valves delivering tempered water to the restroom lavatories are approved devices conforming to ASSE 1070. Reference: Section 607.1.2, IPC 2012.
5. The developed length of the hot water supply piping connected to water heater WH-C appears to be greater than fifty feet; provide a method for maintaining the temperature of the hot water supply system. Provide specifications for WH-C and a detail of the water heater installation, including the excess pressure relief, expansion tank, safety pan, and valves. Reference: Sections 503, 504, 606.1, 607.2, and 607.3, IPC 2012.
6. Verify that the hot water branches from the recirculating hot water system have developed lengths no longer than 50-feet (e.g. to PLHSW at column AA.1-3.9, in the bakery, and to the hose bibbs located near column E-2.6). Reference: Section 607.3, IPC 2012.
7. Appliances (e.g. seafood steamers, ice makers, misting systems, etc) to be directly connected to the water supply system that do not have listed, integral backflow preventers or integral air gaps conforming to Section 608.13.1, IPC require backflow prevention. Specify the type of backflow prevention device required for each water connection (i.e. which ASSE Standard is applicable for each backflow device). Reference: Sections 608.1 and 608.3, IPC 2012.
8. Verify that the Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department for Pima County will allow water from an elevator sump to be introduced into the sanitary waste system. Reference: Section 701.5, IPC 2012; Contact the Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department, at 520-724-6200 for further information. Note: Verify that the proposed floor sink is capable of accepting a flow of 50 GPM without splashing or flooding.
9. Provide a cleanout at the base of the waste stack from the mezzanine. Reference: Section 708.3.4, IPC 2012.
10. Provide separate indirect waste pipes for each compartment of the 3-compartment sinks (Detail PSD-7) to protect against cross-contamination or fouling. Reference: Sections 801.2 and 802.1.8, IPC 2012.
11. Provide sizing calculations for the gravity grease interceptors. Reference: Section 1003.3, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
12. Provide a vent downstream of each gravity grease separator to protect the seals for the grease separators. Reference: Section 1003.9, IPC 2012.
13. Provide roof drainage and hydraulic scupper size calculations based on the 100-year hourly rainfall rate for Tucson, 3" per hour. Reference: Sections 1106.1, 1106.4, and 1108.3, IPC 2012.
14. Provide a cleanout at the base of each roof drain stack prior to connection to the horizontal storm drain. Reference: Sections 708.3.4 and 1101.8, IPC 2012.
15. Provide calculations to show that the overflow pipe (note 07-111, A3.1.1) for the canopy has the same capacity as the roof drain provided for the canopy. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1108, IPC 2012, and Sections 1611.1 and 1611.3, IBC 2012.
16. Detail PSD-106 shows the gas line installation for a seafood grill. If this appliance is to be installed, include the gas load on the gas input schedule and show the gas piping on the plans. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
09/08/2015 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum height of 3/32-inch. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
2. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Tucson. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections C103.2, C401.2, and C303.1.3, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.
3. Show that the mechanical systems for the building comply with the current energy code (e.g. provide the COMcheck Mechanical Compliance Certificate).
4. Show how the "Additional Efficiency Package Requirements" (C406, IECC 2012) is to be accomplished. Reference: Section C401.2, IECC 2012.
5. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012, and Section 312.1, IMC 2012.
6. Provide notes on the drawings indicating what provisions have been made for commissioning the mechanical building systems per Section C408.2, IECC 2012.
7. Condensate drains may not terminate over a roof drain unless the roof drain terminates at or below grade in an area capable of absorbing the condensate flow without surface drainage. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
8. Clarify detail HSD-15: is the detail applicable to this activity and if so, where does it occur? If the gas-fired duct heaters are to be high efficiency units with flue gas condensate, show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drains. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2012 as amended by the City of Tucson and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
9. Provide calculations to show how ventilation will be provided for the occupied spaces. Reference: Section 401.2, IMC 2012.
10. Revise the mechanical design of RTU-4 as required to avoid using the egress corridor as a return air duct. Reference: Section 601.2, IMC 2012.
09/11/2015 DAN SANTA CRUZ ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Please address the following electrical plan review comments.
#1. Plan sheet E4.1a, enlarged pharmacy power plan. Please provide a note for wiring methods to comply with NEC art. 517.13 in patient care or examining rooms.
#2. Plan sheet E6.2. Provide for a primary feeder disconnect switch within site of each dry type power transformer or lockable device if not in site, as required per NEC art.450.14.
#3. Provide for a special inspection for exterior lighting as required per the Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code sec.106.2.1. And also provide compliance for output color temperature for all exterior lighting as required per sec.402.1
Verify that the total Outdoor Lighting calc's plan sheet E1.0 include the exterior lighting on or around the building,or buildings, such as wall-packs, canopy, etc.
Ref: IBC 107.2.1, 2011 NEC
09/15/2015 ELIZABETH LEIBOLD ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DP15-0126 / T15CM05730 / T15OT01092 Fry's Building / Grading Plan / Floodplain Use Permits Review
PDSD Engineering Division provides the following comments for the Fry's project at 1801 W Valencia Rd:
Comments:
1) Admin Man Sec.2-06: Grading Permit may not be issued until Tentative Plat DP15-0037 is approved.
2) Tech Man Sec.4-03.3.5.1: Provide soils report recommendations for setback from drainage areas (100-yr flood limits) to assure buildings are setback at minimum distance. Besides pavement structural design, and setbacks, provide results of infiltration testing. (Results in soils report should be further discussed in drainage report with regard to safety factor and meeting drain down time).
a) Show and label setback distances on planview sheets.
3) Tech Man Sec.2-01: Address the following grading related comments on planviews:
a) Provide legible surveyable limits of 100-yr floodplain.
b) Provide details for bleed pipe from subsurface retention system to outfall area of open drainage channel system.
c) Add additional details/cross sections with additional dimensions for inspections purposes:
i) widths of channels at bottom
ii) east and west channel slope dimensions
iii) outlet area, clarifying existing an proposed structures at Northeast portion of parcel.
d) Assure building has labeled proposed FFE. Add note that As-builts and certification letter will be required to be submitted prior to final grading inspection.
4) Tech Man Sec.4-04.2.3.1: Address the following drainage related comments for report and plans:
a) Provide a drainage facility maintenance list/description for HOA to use as guidelines - see handout from last meeting August 28.
b) Correct drain down time requirement of 24-hrs, not 36 hours.
c) Provide discussion of engineering justification of proposed subsurface retention/detention system and how drainage design meets City of Tucson requirements.
d) Add clarification in report that the project is location within a 100-year FEMA floodplain zone X shaded and in an area designated as a TSMS (Tucson Stormwater Management Study) Balanced Basin Management Area, as well as the within the WBSCR (West Branch Santa Cruz River) Diversion Channel Watershed TSMS (BG).
5) Tech Man Sec.2-01.4: Provide Cut/Fill quantities on Grading Plan cover sheet or a grading sheet.
6) Tucson Code Section 26-42(b): Provide SWPPP report and exhibits sealed by a registrant.
7) Tech Man Sec.4-04.13.3: Elevation Certificates for buildings will be required to show a minimum FFE of 1-ft above 100-year BFE and adjacent grades at or above the adjacent BFE. Provide revised drainage report that includes the highest adjacent BFE and associated minimum FFE for each building (Fuel Kiosk and Fry's building). Correct FFE and PAD elevations on building plan set as these are too low and do not match grading plan set.
8) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.9.M.3: Building, grading and floodplain use permits may not be approved/issued until Tentative Plat DP15-0037 is approved.

Submit revised drainage report, corrected building plan sheets, revised grading plans, SWPPP plans, copy of soils report, and additional FPUP application for 2nd building elevation certificate that will be needed to be prepared at time of grading/FPUP issuance. If you have questions, please contact me at (520)837-4934.
Elizabeth Leibold P.E., CPM, CFM
Elizabeth.Leibold@tucsonaz.gov

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/12/2015 EGALLET1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed