Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T15CM04823
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/14/2015 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Incorrect response regarding panic hardware. Please review 2012 IBC section 1008.1.10. With 2 exits, ONE door (main exit) may not have panic hardware. |
| 08/27/2015 | CLAYTON TREVILLYAN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | THE NEW SHEET B1.0 HAS STRIKE THROUGH LINES OBSTRUCTING LEGIBILITY. PLEASE REVISE SHEET B1.0 |
| 09/01/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Heating and cooling load calculations for the restaurant were not found in this submittal. [Initial comment: Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012, and Section 312.1, IMC 2012.] 2. With regard to RTU-2 and RTU-3, the occupant load used to calculate the required ventilation is not necessarily the same as the occupant load used for calculating exiting requirements or the seating layout provided by the architect. The occupant load used for calculating the minimum required ventilation is to be based on Table 403.3, IMC 2012 or an approved engineering analysis of the specific occupancy type. Verify that the distribution of supply air from the HVAC units during the heating season complies with the requirements of footnote (g) of Table 403.3.1.2, IMC 2012 or use a zone air distribution effectiveness value of 0.8 for the ventilation calculations. Reference: Sections 403.3 and 403.3.1.2, IMC 2012. [Initial comment: Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation using the current code. Reference: Section 403.2, IMC 2012.] |
| 09/01/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Comment not resolved; the specified thermostatic mixing valve is listed to ASSE 1017, not ASSE 1070. [Initial comment: Provide tempered water with a maximum temperature of 110 degrees Fahrenheit for the restroom lavatories using approved devices conforming to ASSE 1070. (The scheduled thermostatic mixing valve is listed per ASSE 1016.) Reference: Sections 416.5 and 607.1.2, IPC 2012.] 2. Two floor drains still have vents that do not rise at least 6" above the flood rim of the fixture they protect; four drains and two floor sinks do not indicate how they are being vented (combination waste & vent?). [Initial comment: Verify that all of the vents (except for vents serving interceptors located outdoors) rise vertically to at least 6" above the flood rims of the fixtures they protect prior to running horizontally. Reference: Section 905.4, IPC 2012.] 3. Revise the design of the sediment traps per Figure 408.4, IFGC 2012. [Initial comment: Provide sediment traps for the gas service to the rooftop AC units. Reference: Section 408.4, IFGC 2012.] |
| 09/01/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Comment not resolved. Provide the proposed size for the water meter. Tucson Water uses Tables E103.3(2) and E103.3(3) to determine the maximum demand for the meter and limits a ¾" meter to demands less than 22.5 GPM; a 1" water meter can accommodate demand up to 37.5 GPM. [Initial comment: Provide the size (and serial number if the meter is existing) of the water meter serving this suite, the size of the backflow preventer associated with the water meter, and the total water demand served by the water meter. Note that the reduced pressure zone backflow prevention assembly associated with the water meter is located in an area that is accessible to Tucson Water (i.e. outside, near the water meter). Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] |
| 09/02/2015 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | While the electrical review for the current submittal is approved, due to the potential modifications necessary to address comments associated with the reviews of other disciplines the electrical workflow is denoted as denied in order to verify that those modifications will not adversely impact the electrical review. |