Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T15CM04368
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
07/01/2015 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
07/10/2015 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
07/15/2015 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: TMC Labor & Delivery T15CM4368 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 15, 2015 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. It appears that the plans match development package DP15-0023 but Zoning will not approve until all other PDSD agencies have approved the building plan. 3. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
07/16/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide automatic faucets for the lavatories in the public restrooms, dispensing a maximum of 0.25 gallons per metering cycle. Reference: Section 416.6, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 2. Verify that the tempered water for the lavatories in the public restrooms is supplied through approved devices conforming to ASSE 1070. Reference: Sections 416.5 and 607.1.2, IPC 2012. 3. The condensate drain boxes are indirect waste receptors. Indirect waste receptors shall have ready access. Reference: Section 802.3, IPC 2012. |
07/17/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the additions to the building envelope; use the climate zone for Tucson. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the additions to the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections C101.4.3, C101.5, and C103.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. 2. Provide NFRC fenestration product ratings for the U-factor and the SHGC values on COMcheck or use the appropriate default U-factor and SHGC values from Tables C303.1.3 (1), C303.1.3 (2) and C303.1.3.(3), IECC 2012. Factory-manufactured windows are required to have certificates attesting to their compliance to NFRC Standards 100 and 200 and can be provided by the manufacturer or found at www.nfrc.org. For site assembled commercial products, the NFRC component modeling approach program enables commercial window manufacturers to produce bid reports to prove energy performance prior to being awarded a job and provide finalized label certificates once the product has been installed. Fenestration performance reports based on AAMA 507 are based on energy simulations only (no actual testing) and are not acceptable. Reference: Section C303.1.3, IECC 2012. |
07/17/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
07/22/2015 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please address the following electrical plan review comments. #1. Please provide full compliance with the IECC for interior lighting. #2. Provide full compliance with the Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code for the exterior lighting. #3. Provide notation on the plans for Wiring Methods to comply with all applicable articles of 2011 NEC. #4. Keynote #1 on plan sheet E515 has reference to "Equipment Drawings" please clarify as to which plan sheet or detail. #5. Plan sheet E519 lighting has no assigned circuiting or switching. #6. Plan sheet E616 outlets have no assigned circuiting ( Labor and Recovery ). #7. Plan sheet E616, areas at rooms #10187, 10187A, 10186B, have no assigned outlet circuiting. #8. Please identify the transformer located in room # 17057. #9. Please clarify or provide the requested information for plan sheet E900. (a) Provide a complete fault current analysis for all service and downstream equipment. Also include AIC rating on the panel schedules.Include load calc's for all service equipment. (b) The equipment shown as existing 'SE3L' and 'SE3LE' are tagged with a keynote #7. Please clarify as there is no keynote #7 on the plan. Also please show the location of this equipment on the plans. (c) Provide for a Selective Coordination Analysis as required per. IBC chap.27, NFPA , NEC art. 517, 620, 700, 701, 708. (d) Provide for a complete Grounding Electrode System, and Bonding for all equipment including service, transformers, transfer switches. Include conductor types, sizes, location of bonding termination, such as, Building steel, water, gas piping , ground rods, ufer etc. (e) Voltages shown for distribution panels 'DR3WC-P', 'DR3WC-PCB', 'DR3WC-PEB' 'DR3WC-PLS' do not correlate with the panel schedules. (f) One line diagram shows main OCPD's for 'SE3A-LE', 'SE3A-LEM', does not correlate with panel schedules. (g) Panel 'WC-UPS-CBA', and 'WC-IDF-CBB' ( panel schedules ) could not be located on the one line diagram, please clarify. #10.Please include all electrical requirements for all mechanical equipment, locations, circuit and or feeder information, as required per NEC, IBC, IMC. #11. Provide locations and power requirements for all low voltage equipment, control cabinets, including Fire Alarm, Nurse Call, Intercom, Communications, Clock system, etc. Also why is there no registrant stamp on these drawings ( T-001 thru T-601 ). NEC art's. 720, 725, 727, 760, 800. #12. Please be advised, do to the numerous discrepancies for this plan review, additional comments may be generated at subsequent review. REF:2012 IBC sec. 107.2.1, Chapter 27, 2011 NEC, 517,700,701, 708, 720, 725, 727, 760, 800, and all other applicable articles, 2012 IMC. . Designing the site Electrical constitutes the practice of engineering. Provide plans sealed by an Arizona Registrant. Reference Arizona Revised Statutes 32-125, Board of Technical Registration Rules R4-30-304 |
07/24/2015 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET G-002; ACCESSORY LEGEND: WHERE ARE THESE 47 ACCESSORIES NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS? PLEASE ADD A REFERENCE NOTE TO THIS TABLE INDICATING THE LOCATION ON THE DRAWINGS. 2. SHEET G-004; MEANS OF EGRESS (AREAS OF REFUGE): PLEASE VERIFY THE APPLICABLE CODE SECTION USED FOR SIZING THE REFUGE AREA (1025.4 IN HORIZONTAL EXITS) IS CORRECT. SHOULD THE APPLICABLE SECTION BE 407.5.1 (IN SMOKE COMPARTMENTS) BE USED? 3. SHEET G-004; SEPARATIONS (MEDICAL GAS STORAGE): THE NOTE REFERENCES TABLE 414.2.2 FOR ALLOWABLE QUANTITIES. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTARY ON THE DRAWINGS INDICATING ALL MATERIALS TO BE STORED IN THIS FACILITY. IF ANY OF THE MATERIALS ARE CONSIDERED TO BE HAZARDOUS ACCORDING TO THE IBC SECTION 414, FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENTS FOR ALLOWABLE STORAGE, CONTROL AREAS, ETC., AND INDICATE ON THE DRAWINGS. 4. SHEET G-011; LIFE SAFETY PLAN: PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON THE DRAWINGS FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL REFUGE AREAS, THE AREA REQUIRED FOR EACH LOCATION, AND THE NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS ALLOWED IN EACH REFUGE AREA. INDICATE EACH AREA ON THE PLAN. 5. SHEET S-001: PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR REVIEW. 6. SHEET S-001A: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE THE NOTES AS REQUIRED. 7. SHEET S-003 (MOMENT FRAME CONNECTION SCHEDULE); SHEET S-002 (COLUMN SCHEDULE); SHEET S-102 (FRAMING PLAN): THE BEAM AND COLUMN SIZES INDICATED IN THE MOMENT FRAME CONNECTION SCHEDULE DO NOT MATCH COLUMN SIZES INDICATED ON SHEET S-002, OR THE BEAM SIZES INDICATED ON SHEET S-102, OR SIZES INDICATED IN THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS. PLEASE CLARIFY. 8. SHEET S-101: PLEASE PROVIDE A NOTE ON THIS SHEET TO REFERENCE SHEET S-201 FOR THE FOOTING SCHEDULE. 9. SHEET S-101 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE FOOTINGS AT G/3.5 AND G/4.8 SHOULD BE 5.00' X 1.76', WHILE THE DRAWINGS INDICATE A FOOTING F5 (5'-6" X 1'-6"). PLEASE CLARIFY. 10. SHEET S-101 (FOUNDATION PLAN/SECTION 14/S-202); SHEET S-102 (FRAMING PLAN/SECTION 13/S-301): PLEASE PROVIDE A SECTION ON THE DRAWINGS WHERE THE CMU WALL (14/S-202) TRANSITIONS TO A METAL STUD WALL (13/S-301). 11. SHEET S-101; FOUNDATION PLAN: A SLAB DEPRESSION NOTE NORTH OF GRID 2 ON GRID B REFERENCES 13/S-201. IF THAT REFERENCE CORRECT? 12. SHEET S-101 (FOUNDATION PLAN/SECTION 4/S-202): THE COLUMN ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THIS SECTION INDICATES "HSS POST-SEE ELEVATIONS". PLEASE PROVIDE A REFERENCE ON THE SECTION TO THOSE ELEVATIONS (S-104). 13. SHEET S-101 (FOUNDATION PLAN/SECTION 2/S-202): THE WALL NOTE INDICATES "HSS GIRT (AND HSS STUB POST)-SEE ELEVATIONS". PLEASE PROVIDE A REFERENCE ON THE SECTION TO THOSE ELEVATIONS (S-104). 14. SHEET S-101 (FOUNDATION PLAN/SECTION 9/S-202): THE WALL NOTE INDICATES "HSS GIRT-SEE ELEVATIONS". PLEASE PROVIDE A REFERENCE ON THE SECTION TO THOSE ELEVATIONS (S-104). 15. SHEET S-102 (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S-003 (MOMENT FRAME CONNECTION SCHEDULE): THE NEW CANOPY INDICATES SEVERAL M205 MOMENT FRAMES. THIS TAG IS NOT IDENTIFIED IN THE MOMENT FRAME CONNECTION SCHEDULE. PLEASE CLARIFY. 16. SHEET S-102; FRAMING PLAN: FIVE BEAMS WEST OF GRID B ON GRID 4 INDICATE W8. PLEASE COMPLETE. 17. SHEET S-104: PLEASE PROVIDE ALL COLUMN AND BEAM SIZES ON ELEVATIONS A, B, AND C. 18. SHEETS D-111, D-117, AND A-114: KEY NOTES 4, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 23, 24, 26, 27, AND 28 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLANS. PLEASE VERIFY. 19. SHEET A-111; GENERAL NOTES: NOTE 9 REFERENCES ICC/ANSI SECTION 7-3. REVISE THE REFERENCE TO 703. 20. SHEETS A-111, A-114, AND A-115; FLOOR PLAN LEGEND: PLEASE COMPLETE THE SHEET REFERENCES FOR THE WALL TYPE TAGS, WINDOW TAGS, EQUIPMENT CODES AND ROOM ACCESSORIES. 21. SHEET A-111; FLOOR PLAN: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE THE DIMENSIONS. 22. SHEET A-111; FLOOR PLAN: PLEASE COMPLETE THE BUILDING ELEVATION REFERENCE LOCATED NEAR GRIDS A.6 AND 6.5. 23. SHEET A-111; FLOOR PLAN: PLEASE COMPLETE THE SECTION CUT LOCATED ON GRID .6. 24. SHEET A-111; FLOOR PLAN: PLEASE REVISE THE BUILDING SECTION CUTS ON THE PLAN (C1 AND C3). ADD THE SHEET REFERENCE. 25. SHEET A-111 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A-200 (ELEVATION J1): PLEASE REVISE THE ELEVATION TITLE TO EAST. 26. SHEET A-114; CONSTRUCTION PLAN: A NOTE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PLAN INDICATES A PRE-ENGINEERED COVERED WALK. IS THE NEW COVERED WALK PART OF THIS PERMIT? IF SO, PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR THE FOUNDATION DESIGN. WILL THIS COVER BE A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL? PLEASE VERIFY. 27. SHEET A-114; CONSTRUCTION PLAN: THE WALLS AT TOILETS 11372 AND 11373 ARE NEW CONSTRUCTION. PLEASE REFERENCE THE PARTITION TYPES. 28. SHEET A-114; CONSTRUCTION PLAN: TOILETS 11372 AND 11373 DO NOT APPEAR TO BE ACCESSIBLE PER THE IBC SECTION 1109.2 AND ICC/ANSI SECTION 604. PLEASE VERIFY. 29. SHEET A-115; PARTIAL FIRST FLOOR PLAN: PLEASE REFERENCE THE WALL TYPES AT THE NEW WALLS INDICATED ON THE PLAN. 30. SHEET A-140; PENTHOUSE PLAN: PLEASE REFERENCE THE WALL TYPES AT THE NEW PENTHOUSE WALL INDICATED ON THE PLAN. 31. SHEET A-140; ROOF PLAN: PLEASE COMPLETE THE SECTION CUTS ON GRID E (TWO THUS) AND GRID 3 (ONE THUS). 32. SHEET A-140; PENTHOUSE PLAN: PLEASE COMPLETE THE SECTION CUTS ON GRID E (ONE THUS) AND GRID 3 (ONE THUS). 33. SHEET A-140; ROOF PLAN: PLEASE REVISE THE BUILDING SECTION CUTS ON THE PLAN (C1 AND C3). ADD THE SHEET REFERENCE. 34. SHEETS A-161 AND A-162; KEY NOTES: PLEASE COORDINATE/ADD THE DEMOLITION KEY NOTES WITH THE DEMOLITION PLAN. 35. SHEET A-170; SECTIONS G1, F3, J3, H4, AND H5: PLEASE INDICATE ON THE DRAWINGS METAL STUD SIZES AND SPACING, ROOF FRAMING TO SUPPORT THE METAL STUDS, BRACING AS REQUIRED, AND THE CONNECTION OF THE METAL STUDS TO SUPPORT MEMBERS. 36. SHEET A-200; ELEVATION C1: PLEASE REVISE THE BUILDING SECTION CUTS ON THE ELEVATION (C1 AND C3). ADD THE SHEET REFERENCE. 37. SHEET A-309; SECTION H-1; WALL PROFILE C5: TWO SECTION CUTS REFERENCE SHEET A-310. PLEASE REVISE THE SHEET REFERENCE. 38. SHEET A-410; ENLARGED PLAN C1: A TYPE 7B PARTITION IS CALLED OUT IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS. SHEET A-700 DOES NOT INDICATE A TYPE 7 WALL. PLEASE CLARIFY. 39. SHEET A-410; ENLARGED PLAN C1: WALLS ON THE SOUTH AND EAST SIDE OF THE IDF ROOM INDICATE A 35B PARTITION TYPE. SHEET G-011 INDICATES THESE TWO PORTIONS OF WALL AS ONE HOUR SMOKE COMPARTMENTS. THE PARTITION TYPE 35B ON SHEET A-700 DOES NOT INDICATE A RATED WALL. PLEASE CLARIFY. 40. SHEET A-410; ENLARGED PLAN C1: AN ELEVATION INDICATOR IN THE MEN'S PUBLIC RESTROOM REFERENCES 7!/A-410. PLEASE REVISE. 41. SHEET A-410; ENLARGED PLAN H1: IN THE LOWER RESTROOM, AN ELEVATION INDICATOR REFERENCES 1 AND 2/A-410. PLEASE REVISE. 42. SHEET A-412; ENLARGED PLAN C1: THE SOUTH WALL AT SECURITY INDICATES A 3B PARTITION TYPE. SHEET G-011 INDICATES THIS WALL AS A ONE HOUR FIRE BARRIER. THE PARTITION TYPE 3B ON SHEET A-700 DOES NOT INDICATE A RATED WALL. PLEASE CLARIFY. 43. SHEET A-412; ENLARGED PLAN C1: THE NORTH AND SOUTH WALLS AT THE VESTIBULE DO NOT HAVE A PARTITION TYPE REFERENCE. PLEASE PROVIDE. 44. SHEET A-412; ENLARGED PLAN C1: THE NORTH WALL AT SECURITY DOES NOT HAVE A PARTITION TYPE REFERENCE. PLEASE PROVIDE. 45. SHEET A-412; ENLARGED PLAN C1: MANY OF THE SOUTH WALLS DO NOT HAVE A PARTITION TYPE REFERENCE. PLEASE PROVIDE. 46. SHEET A-413; ENLARGED PLAN C3: THE WALLS AROUND THE CLEAN ROOM INDICATE 1B, 3A, AND 3B PARTITION TYPES. SHEET G-011 INDICATES THESE WALLS ARE ONE HOUR RATED WALLS. THE PARTITION TYPES 1B, 3A, AND 3B ON SHEET A-700 DO NOT INDICATE A RATED WALL. PLEASE CLARIFY. 47. SHEET A-414; FAMILY WAITING ELEVATION F1: THE DISTANCE FROM THE FINISH FLOOR TO THE TOP OF THE COUNTER SHOULD BE 2'-10" FOR ACCESSIBILITY PER THE ICC/ANSI SECTION 606.3. PLEASE REVISE. 48. SHEET A-414; ENLARGED PLAN C1: THE NORTH AND WEST WALLS AT THE TRANSFORMER AREA DO NOT HAVE A PARTITION TYPE REFERENCE. SHEET G-011 INDICATES THESE WALLS ARE TWO HOUR RATED WALLS. PLEASE PROVIDE. 49. SHEET A-414; ENLARGED PLAN C1: THE NORTH AND PARTIAL WEST WALL OF THE TRIAGE ROOM 17021 INDICATE A 3B PARTITION TYPE. SHEET G-011 INDICATES THESE WALLS ARE ONE HOUR RATED WALLS. THE PARTITION TYPE 3B ON SHEET A-700 DOES NOT INDICATE A RATED WALL. PLEASE CLARIFY. 50. SHEET A-415; ENLARGED PLAN C1: THE WEST WALL OF THE SOILED TRASH AND J.C. ROOMS INDICATE A 3B PARTITION TYPE. SHEET G-011 INDICATES THESE WALLS ARE ONE HOUR RATED WALLS. THE PARTITION TYPE 3B ON SHEET A-700 DOES NOT INDICATE A RATED WALL. PLEASE CLARIFY. 51. SHEET A-415; ENLARGED PLAN C1: THE WEST WALL OF THE TRIAGE 8 ROOM INDICATES A 3A OR 3B PARTITION TYPE. SHEET G-011 INDICATES THESE WALLS ARE ONE HOUR RATED WALLS. THE PARTITION TYPES 3A AND 3B ON SHEET A-700 DO NOT INDICATE RATED WALLS. PLEASE CLARIFY. 52. SHEET A-416; ENLARGED PLAN C1: THE EAST WALL AT THE LABOR AND DELIVERY ROOM AND CONTINUING NORTH TO GRID 4.6 INDICATES 3A, 3B, AND 35B PARTITION TYPES. SHEET G-011 INDICATES THESE WALLS ARE ONE HOUR RATED WALLS. THE PARTITION TYPES 3A, 3B, AND 35B ON SHEET A-700 DO NOT INDICATE RATED WALLS. PLEASE CLARIFY. 53. SHEET A-416; ENLARGED PLAN C1: THE WALLS AT THE ELECTRICAL ROOM INDICATE A 35B PARTITION TYPE. SHEET G-011 INDICATES THESE WALLS ARE ONE HOUR RATED WALLS. THE PARTITION TYPE 35B ON SHEET A-700 DOES NOT INDICATE A RATED WALL. PLEASE CLARIFY. 54. SHEET A-416 (ENLARGED PLAN C1); SHEET G-011: PLEASE VERIFY THE WALLS INDICATED AS SMOKE PARTITIONS IN THIS AREA ON SHEET G-011 MATCH THE PARTITION TYPES INDICATED ON THE PLAN ON A-416 AND THE PARTITION TYPES DETAILED ON SHEET A-700. 55. SHEET A-417; CORRIDOR PLAN D1: PLEASE IDENTIFY THE PARTITION TYPES ON THE PLAN. 56. SHEET A-417; FLOOR PLAN LEGEND: PLEASE COMPLETE THE SHEET REFERENCES FOR THE WALL TYPE TAGS, WINDOW TAGS, EQUIPMENT CODES, AND ROOM ACCESSORIES. 57. SHEET A-601; DOOR AND FRAME SCHEDULE: PLEASE VERIFY ALL DOOR RATED ASSEMBLIES ARE NOTED AS RATED IN THE SCHEDULE. 58. SHEET A-602; WINDOW SCHEDULE: PLEASE VERIFY ALL WINDOW COMPONENTS IN RATED ASSEMBLIES ARE NOTED AS RATED IN THE SCHEDULE. 59. SHEET A-700; PARTITION TYPES 5, 6, AND 8: THE TITLE FOR THESE PARTITIONS INDICATES 6" ABOVE CEILING, BUT SHOWS THE STUD TO THE STRUCTURE. PLEASE CLARIFY. 60. SHEET A-700: DUE TO THE NUMBER OF COMMENTS, PLEASE VERIFY ALL RATED PARTITION TYPES ARE INDICATED ON THE PLANS AND ON THE DETAILS. 61. SHEETS A-705 AND A-706: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE THE VERBIAGE. 62. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE NORTH ARROWS ON ALL STRUCTURAL AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. 63. GENERAL: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE VERIFY ALL VERBIAGE AND DIMENSIONS MEET THAT CRITERION. TYPICALLY THE DIMENSIONS APPEAR TOO SMALL. 64. GENERAL: PLEASE VERIFY ON THE DRAWINGS THE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTION 407.7, AND THE AUTOMATIC FIRE DETECTION MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTION 407.8. 65. GENERAL: PLEASE VERIFY ON THE DRAWINGS THAT ALL OPENING ASSEMBLIES IN RATED WALLS MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC TABLE 716.5. 66. GENERAL: DUE TO THE NUMBER OF COMMENTS IN THIS REVIEW, FURTHER REVIEW AT THE TIME OF SECOND SUBMITTAL MAY ADD NEW COMMENTS. 67. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
07/27/2015 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | Engineering will stamp plans once all reviewers have approved bldg set. |