Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T15CM03931
Parcel: 117150050

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI

Permit Number - T15CM03931
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/28/2015 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Reqs Change BASED ON PLAN INFORMATION SUBMITTED, FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS REQUIRED AS A-2 OCCUPANCY PROPOSED IS OVER 100 OCCUPANT LOAD. I WILL CONTINUE REVIEW ONCE PLANS GET UPDATED WITH FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM OR THE OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION CHANGE
08/04/2015 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change FROM: David Rivera
Principal Planner

PROJECT: T15CM03931
100 E Congress Street - Zoning OCR-2
Vanilla Shell Building Permit - No use yet

TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 4, 2015

DUE DATE: August 28, 2015

COMMENTS:

02. Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve them at this time.

03. Prior to Zoning approval of the building plans for the proposed rebuild of the former Grill building, the plans must be reviewed and approved by HPZ and DRB review and approval process.

04. Zoning will review the building plans and ensure that compliance with the HPZ and DRB conditions of approval has been demonstrated on the building plans.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608.
08/07/2015 CLAYTON TREVILLYAN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change BUILDING PLAN
REVIEW COMMENTS
Date: 8-10-15
Activity: T15CM03931
Address: 100 E. Congress St
Applicant: Repp Mclain Design

This letter reflects comments to be addressed. The purpose of this review is to verify compliance to the 2012 International Building Code and local amendments. Plans must be of sufficient clarity to indicate the location, nature and extent of the work proposed, 102.2.1. In order to facilitate a shorter back check time, we request that you please provide two complete sets of revised plans and calculations, along with a written response to each of the noted items indicating action taken. Other comment references may be derived from additional codes and standards adopted by The City of Tucson. All features have been checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided for review. All portions of this project are assumed to meet other departmental requirements, conditions and concerns before permit approval.

Sheet A1.0:
1. Correct page references to section drawings. Page A3.0 has not been provided.
2. Please provide consistent information regarding which of the three mechanical units will be installed under this permit. Reconcile with structural and mechanical pages.

Sheet S1.2:
3. Provide column footing sizes consistent with structural calculations. The structural calculations indicate larger footings for CF1, CF2, CF3 and CF4 than indicated on the foundation design.
4. Please include a masonry lintel schedule as indicated on detail 8-S4.0.

Sheet S2.0:
5. Specify the size of the steel roof beam located at match line 4 as indicated on detail 4-S4.0.
6. Provide a roof joist schedule and define framing members J1 as referenced on roof framing plan.
7. Please define the connection method of roof beams B3 to support beams B1 and BF2.
8. Include a reference location on the foundation design for keynote 1.

Sheet S4.0:
9. Clarify how the proposed continuous vertical reinforcement (as called out on the reinforcement schedule) will be maintained at each end of the new masonry wall on the south side of the building. Detail 10-S4.0 shows a beam pocket located at the ends of the wall that interrupts the reinforcement.

Sheet S4.1:
10. Please provide consistent information regarding the size of the diagonal brace material for the steel frame. Page 58 of the structural calculations calls for 6x6x3/8 tube steel and detail 7-S4.1 indicates 5x5x3/8.

If you have any questions please contact:
Clayton Trevillyan, CBO
520.837.4913
Clayton.Trevillyan@tucsonaz.gov
08/12/2015 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Detail A/P1.0 shows the vented fixture drains from the lavatories (P-1) terminating at the water closet vents (P-2). This results in the vent connections for the water closet being below the trap weir of the lavatories. Reference: Section 909.2, IPC 2012.
2. Clarify the specifications for WH-3 (complete with expansion tank and recirculating pump) shown on sheet M1.0.
3. Provide roof drainage and hydraulic scupper size calculations based on the 100-year hourly rainfall rate for Tucson, 3" per hour. Include the effect of any vertical walls that can divert rainfall onto the roof. Reference: Sections 1106.1, 1106.4, and 1108.3, IPC 2012.
4. Provide secondary (overflow) roof drainage. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1108, IPC 2012, and Sections 1611.1 and 1611.3, IBC 2012.
08/13/2015 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. With the installation of a heat pump, this is no longer a low energy use building. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Tucson. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections C101.5.2, C103.2, and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.
2. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012, and Section 312.1, IMC 2012.
08/13/2015 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Reqs Change Section 604.1, IPC 2012 allows water distribution systems to be designed using accepted engineering methods but as of February 14, 2013, Tucson Water restricted the method for determining the size of water meters to the method shown in Appendix E, IPC 2012. Verify the water demand using Tables E103.3 (2) and E103.3 (3), IPC 2012.
08/14/2015 DAN SANTA CRUZ ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Please address the following plan review comments.
$1. Provide for exhaust fan switching controls and circuit designation for the restroom fans.
#2. Per City of Tucson policy, all new electrical service equipment is to be fed underground by the serving utility.
A underground service waiver may be obtained at 201 N Stone, mon - fri, 8am untill 4pm. If it is denied, the plan documents will need to be changed.
Ref; IBC sec. 107.2.1, NEC .