Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T15CM03908
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/19/2015 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/19/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 08/25/2015 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. PREVIOUS COMMENT 5; SHEET a0.1 (SITE PLAN); SHEET a3.0 (FLOOR PLAN): THE EXITS FOR THESE TWO PLANS DO NOT MATCH. PLEASE COORDINATE. 2. SHEET a0.2 (EXITING PLAN); SHEET a3.0 (FLOOR PLAN): THE EXITS FOR THESE TWO PLANS DO NOT MATCH. PLEASE COORDINATE. 3. PREVIOUS COMMENT 12; SHEET a0.2 (EXITING PLAN): PLEASE INDICATE ON THE PLAN THE CLEAR DISTANCE BETWEEN THE PATIO (WEST EDGE) AND THE ADJACENT STRUCTURE (FURTHEST EAST WALL) MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC TABLE 602 FOR SEPARATION. 4. PREVIOUS COMMENT 22; SHEET a3.0; FLOOR PLAN: PLEASE INDICATE ON THIS DRAWING A CALCULATION FOR THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SEATS PER THE IBC SECTION 1109.11, AND INDICATE THOSE SEATING LOCATIONS ON THE FLOOR PLAN (ONLY FOUR LOCATIONS SHOWN). 5. PREVIOUS COMMENT 29; SHEETS a9.1 AND a9.2: DETAILS 37/a9.1, 38/a9.1, 44/a9.2, 48/a9.2, 50/a9.2, AND 51/a9.2 DO NOT MEET THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIREMENTS FOR LETTERING HEIGHT (3/32" MINIMUM FOR UPPER AND LOWER CASE). PLEASE REVISE. 6. PREVIOUS COMMENT 30: NO STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS OR DRAWINGS WERE LOCATED IN THIS REVIEW SET TO VERIFY THE EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE CAN SAFELY SUPPORT THE NEW MECHANICAL LOADS. PLEASE PROVIDE. 7. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 08/28/2015 | AROMERO4 | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Needs Review |