Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T15CM03908
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/16/2015 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/22/2015 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/22/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 06/23/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide backflow protection for the misting system (backpressure and back-siphonage). Reference: Section 608.3 and Table 608.1, IPC 2012. 2. Show how the water connection to the smoker is protected from backflow. Reference: Section 608.3, IPC 2012. 3. The specified backflow prevention device, Watts model L7U2-2 (an obsolete product), is not listed for ASSE 1022 (dual check w/ vent) as required for coffee machines or non-carbonated beverage dispensers. Reference: Section 608.16.10, IPC 2012. |
| 06/24/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide justification for the use of a Zone Air Distribution Effectiveness (Ev) of 1.0 for a ceiling supply, ceiling return using gas-fired rooftop units. Reference: Section 403.3.1.2, IMC 2012. 2. Calculation of the required minimum ventilation for air handlers serving multiple zones requires the balancing data (supply CFM) for each zone and the calculations described in Sections 403.3.2.3.1 through 403.3.2.3.4, IMC 2012. Reference: section 403.3.2.3, IMC 2012. 3. Show that the alteration from the existing storefront to roll-up doors and a new storefront assembly are in compliance with the 2012 International Energy Code (i.e. use COMcheck for the alteration). Use NFRC fenestration product ratings for the U-factor and the SHGC values of the new components on COMcheck or use the appropriate default U-factor and SHGC values from Tables C303.1.3 (1), C303.1.3 (2) and C303.1.3.(3), IECC 2012. Reference: Section C303.1.3, IECC 2012. |
| 06/29/2015 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | #1. Please provide for GFI protection for all 120 volt recepticles in food prep, kitchen areas.Ref; Plan Sheet E2.0 #2. One line diagram shows new panel 'C' as existing, the panel schedule shows as new. Please clarify. Ref: plan Sheet E3.0. IBC sec. 107.2.1, NEC 110, 210.8 B. |
| 07/14/2015 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET a0.1; PROJECT DATA: PLEASE VERIFY THE LISTED SQUARE FOOTAGE. THE INTERIOR IS INDICATED AS 2451 SF, AND THE TOTAL SF INDICATED AS 3312 SF (A DIFFERENCE OF 861 SF), WHICH DOES NOT MATCH THE 785 SF AS SHOWN AT THE EXTERIOR PATIO. 2. SHEET a0.1; PROJECT DATA: PLEASE VERIFY THE LISTED OCCUPANT LOAD. THE INTERIOR IS INDICATED AS 104 OCCUPANTS, AND THE TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD INDICATED AS 163 (A DIFFERENCE OF 59 OCCUPANTS), WHICH DOES NOT MATCH THE 53 OCCUPANTS AS SHOWN AT THE EXTERIOR PATIO. 3. SHEET a0.1; PROJECT DATA: PLEASE VERIFY THE LISTED PLUMBING FIXTURE CALCULATIONS. FOR ALL OF THE FIXTURES, A TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD OF 113 WAS USED (OCCUPANCY LOAD CALCULATIONS INDICATE 163 OCCUPANTS TOTAL). 4. SHEET a0.1; PROJECT DATA: PLEASE VERIFY THE LISTED FIRE RATED CONSTRUCTION FOR THE NON-BEARING INTERIOR WALLS AND PARTITIONS (REFERENCE THE IBC TABLE 601). 5. SHEET a0.1 (SITE PLAN); SHEET a3.0 (FLOOR PLAN): THE EXITS INDICATED FOR THIS BUILDING ON THE SITE PLAN DO NOT MATCH THOSE INDICATED ON THE FLOOR PLAN. PLEASE VERIFY. 6. SHEET a0.1; PROJECT DATA: THE INCREASE IN THE OCCUPANT LOAD TO 163 OCCUPANTS (82 OCCUPANTS OF EACH SEX) DUE TO THE INCREASED PATIO SIZE NOW REQUIRES TWO ADDITIONAL RESTROOMS (82/75 = 2 TOILETS PER SEX). PLEASE REVISE THE DRAWINGS. 7. SHEET a0.2; EXITING PLAN: THE PLAN INDICATES 6 OCCUPANTS EXITING AT THE KITCHEN AND 99 EXITING IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER. PLEASE INDICATE ON THE PLAN THE EXIT TO BE USED BY THE REMAINING OCCUPANTS. 8. SHEET a0.2; EXITING PLAN: THE 69'-5" EXIT DOOR SEPARATION IS NOT MEASURED TO THE CORRECT DOOR ON THE SOUTH SIDE. ALTHOUGH THE NEW EXIT IS ACCESSIBLE, IT TAKES YOU ON AN EXIT PATH THAT RETURNS TO THE EXIT IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER. THE ORIGINAL EXIT SHOULD REMAIN AN EXIT. AN ACCESSIBLE RAMP WOULD BE REQUIRED THERE (THE EXISTING RAMP IS BEING REMOVED). 9. SHEET a0.2; EXITING PLAN: THE EXIT SIGN AT THE SOUTH EXIT IS NOT INDICATED AT THE CORRECT DOOR. SEE NOTE 8 ABOVE. 10. SHEET a0.2; EXITING PLAN: THE PATIO REQUIRES TWO EXITS PER THE IBC SECTION 1015.1. THE DOORS SHALL SWING IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS TRAVEL PER THE IBC SECTION 1008.1.2. EXTERIOR EXIT DOORS SHALL LEAD DIRECTLY TO THE EXIT DISCHARGE OR THE PUBLIC WAY PER THE IBC SECTION 1020.2.2. THE NEW SOUTH EXIT DOES NOT MEET ALL OF THESE CRITERIA. SEE NOTE 8 ABOVE. 11. SHEET a0.2; EXITING PLAN: THE EXIT DOOR IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE BUILDING AND THE PATIO EXIT AT THE NORTH DO NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTION 1005.7.1 FOR MEANS OF EGRESS ENCROACHMENT. PLEASE REVISE. 12. SHEET a0.2; EXITING PLAN: PLEASE VERIFY ON THE DRAWINGS THE CLEAR DISTANCE BETWEEN THE PATIO AND THE ADJACENT STRUCTURE TO THE WEST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC TABLE 602 FOR SEPARATION. 13. SHEET a0.2 (EXITING PLAN); SHEET FS1.0: PLEASE VERIFY ON THE DRAWINGS THE MEANS OF EGRESS AISLE THROUGH THE KITCHEN AT THE SMOKER MEETS THE WIDTH REQUIREMENTS PER THE IBC SECTION 1028.9.1. 14. SHEET a2.0; DEMOLITION PLAN: KEYNOTE 7 INDICATES 'NOT USED', BUT IS SHOWN AT THE SOUTH ENTRANCE. PLEASE CLARIFY. 15. SHEET a2.0; DEMOLITION PLAN: KEYNOTE 45 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. PLEASE VERIFY. 16. SHEET a3.0; FLOOR PLAN: IS THE DOOR IN THE NORTHWEST OF THE BUILDING ACCESSIBLE? PLEASE VERIFY. 17. SHEET a3.0; FLOOR PLAN: PLEASE VERIFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTIONS 3411.8.1 AND 1105 FOR ENTRANCES ARE MET. 18. SHEET a3.0; FLOOR PLAN: THE MAIN ENTRY AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER WAS ORIGINALLY ACCESSIBLE WITH A RAMP. THE IBC SECTION 3411.3 INDICATES 'ALTERATIONS SHALL NOT REDURE OR HAVE THE EFFECT OF REDUCING ACCESSIBILITY OF A FACILITY OR PORTION OF A FACILITY'. REMOVING THE EXISTING RAMP AND THUS THE ACCESSIBILITY OF THAT ENTRANCE DOES HAVE THAT EFFECT. PLEASE REVISE THE DRAWINGS. 19. SHEET a3.0; FLOOR PLAN: PLEASE VERIFY THE EGRESS WIDTH WHEN DOOR 113a (WOMEN'S RESTROOM) IS FULLY OPEN MEETS THE IBC REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 1005.7.1 AND AISLE ACCESSWAYS PER SECTION 1028.10.1. 20. SHEET a3.0; FLOOR PLAN: PLEASE VERIFY THE EGRESS WIDTH IN THE KITCHEN AT THE SMOKER MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTION 1005. 21. SHEET a3.0; FLOOR PLAN: THE MANEUVERING CLEARANCE FOR THE DOORWAY 101a DOES NOT APPEAR TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ICC/ANSI TABLE 404.2.3.2. PLEASE VERIFY. 22. SHEET a3.0; FLOOR PLAN: PLEASE PROVIDE ON THE PLAN THE NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE SEATING PLACES REQUIRED, AND INDICATE THOSE SPACES ON THE PLAN. 23. SHEET a3.0; FLOOR PLAN: A KEYNOTE 19 IS INDICATED IN A TENANT SPACE EAST OF THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REMOVE. 24. SHEET a3.0; FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTES: NOTES 6 AND 28 REFERENCE SHEET a5.0 FOR THE DOOR AND HARDWARE SCHEDULES. PLEASE REVISE THE REFERENCE. 25. SHEET a3.0; FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTES: NOTE 2 REFERENCES SHEET a3.0 FOR THE FLOORING SCHEDULE. PLEASE REVISE THE REFERENCE. 26. SHEET a3.0; FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTES: NOTE 26 REFERENCES 11/a9.0 FOR VARIOUS ITEMS. PLEASE REVISE THE REFERENCE. 27. SHEET a3.0; FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTES: NOTES 33, 38, 41, AND 61 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. PLEASE VERIFY. 28. SHEET a5.1; DOOR SCHEDULE: DOOR 108a LISTS A HARDWARE SET F. THAT IS NOT IN THE HARDWARE SCHEDULE. PLEASE CLARIFY. 29. SHEETS a9.1 AND a9.2: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE THE VERBIAGE AT SEVERAL DETAILS. 30. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS TO VERIFY THE EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE CAN SAFELY SUPPORT THE NEW MECHANICAL LOADS. 31. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |