Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T15CM03654
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/10/2015 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/18/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Clarify the water connection to the bag-n-box (#17). On sheet P2.1, the installation of a backflow prevention device is shown but none is identified on the plumbing schedule. 2. A note on sheet P2.1 calls for "…backflow preventers or check valves…" to be provided. Check valves are not listed as backflow preventers. Reference: Section 303.2, IPC 2012. 3. The use of PEX tubing is identified as an Add/Alternate on sheet T1.1. For the use of PEX tubing, provide a branch tube sizing chart showing the correct size of PEX tubing to be used as a substitute for the copper pipe shown on the drawings. Reference: Sections 303.2 and 604.3, IPC 2012. 4. Provide backflow protection for the water connection to the custard machine (#46.0). Reference: Sections 608.1 and 608.3, IPC 2012. 5. Appliances (e.g. easiwash cleaning system, #10.0) to be directly connected to the water supply system that do not have listed, integral backflow preventers or integral air gaps conforming to Section 608.13.1, IPC require backflow prevention. Specify the type of backflow prevention device required for each water connection. Reference: Sections 608.1 and 608.3, IPC 2012. 6. Clarify the reason for using an indirect waste connection for the work table sink (31.1), service sink (#44.0), and hand sink (#41.0). Reference: Section 802.1, IPC 2012. 7. Provide secondary (overflow) roof drainage. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1108, IPC 2012, and Sections 1611.1 and 1611.3, IBC 2012. 8. Clarify the installation of the water heater; detail 204/P2.2 shows the water heater mounted on the floor but detail 12/A8.2 shows the water heater mounted on a shelf. The water heater is specified as having both a 50-gallon storage capacity and a 65-gallon capacity on sheet P2.4. Determine what the storage capacity of the water heater is supposed to be and provide structural calculations if the water heater is to be mounted on a shelf. Reference: Section 301.2, IPC 2012 and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. |
| 06/18/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Tucson. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections C103.2 and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. 2. Provide NFRC fenestration product ratings for the U-factor and the SHGC values on COMcheck or use the appropriate default U-factor and SHGC values from Tables C303.1.3 (1), C303.1.3 (2) and C303.1.3.(3), IECC 2012. Reference: Section C303.1.3, IECC 2012. |
| 06/18/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 06/22/2015 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Freddy's @ Old Vail Plaza T15CM3654 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 22, 2015 1. The building plan have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. It appears that the plans match development package DP14-0248 but cannot be approved until the development package is approved. 3. Zoning will not approve until all other PDSD agencies have approved the building plan. 4. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 06/24/2015 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | While the electrical review for the current submittal is approved, due to the potential modifications necessary to address comments associated with the reviews of other disciplines the electrical workflow is denoted as denied in order to verify that those modifications will not adversely impact the electrical review. |
| 06/26/2015 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/01/2015 | CLAYTON TREVILLYAN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS Date: 7-2-15 Activity: T15CM03654 Address: 10205 Old Vail Rd Applicant: Diana Flynn (ADG) This letter reflects comments to be addressed. The purpose of this review is to verify compliance to the 2012 International Building Code and local amendments. In order to facilitate a shorter back check time, we request that you please provide two complete sets of revised plans and calculations, along with a written response to each of the noted items indicating action taken. Other comment references may be derived from additional codes and standards adopted by The City of Tucson. All features have been checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided for review. All portions of this project are assumed to meet other departmental requirements, conditions and concerns before permit approval. Sheet T1.1 1. Please clarify the code analysis, 107.2.1. The total occupant load specified is 183 but the egress capacity required indicates 138. Note: The plumbing fixtures required will be higher than specified if the occupant load is 183. Sheet AS1.1 2. Specify the location of the gas supply from the utility to the building, 107.2.1. 3. Please include information regarding the accessible provisions from the public way and accessible parking spaces to the front door in accordance with sections 1104 and 1106. 4. Please remove foundation details for signs including kiosk and menu boards from this plan set unless the design for these elements are included as well, 107.2.1 Sheet A1.1 5. The door from the kitchen area may not swing into the egress path from the women's restroom more than half the required egress width, 604.9.3. Sheet A1.2 6. The door serving the toilet compartment in the men's restroom may not swing into the minimum required area, ANSI A117 604.9.3. 7. Please revise the note on detail 2 for an inward swing door. The exception called out only applies to a toilet room intended for individual use, ANSI A117 603.2.3. Sheet A3.1 8. Provide additional exit signage so as to clearly identify the direction of egress where the exit is not immediately visible to the occupants, 1011.1. Refer to kitchen area leading to utility room exit. Note: The electrical layout will need to be updated when additional exit signage is added. Sheet A5.1 9. Please include the match line reference for section drawing 3. Sheet A6.2 10. Include the require knee and toe clearances for counter spaces serving accessible purposes, ANSI A117 904.3.2. Sheet A7.1 11. Please clarify the abbreviations used for closer hardware. Both operators and closers are indicated as CL-1. 12. Privacy latch door hardware may not be used on a restroom serving multiple occupants, 2902.3.5. Sheet S2.1 13. Provide consistent information regarding hardware to be installed on the L1 ledger boards. The structural calculations indicate LS70 and the plan set specifies H2.5, 107.2.1. If you have any questions please contact: Clayton Trevillyan, CBO 520.837.4913 Clayton.Trevillyan@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/03/2015 | CPIERCE1 | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Needs Review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/24/2015 | AROMERO4 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |