Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T15CM02963
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/09/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 07/09/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The projected loads for each of the two "future" gas branches have not been identified. [Initial comment: Clarify the anticipated loads for each of the two "future" branches and coordinate the gas-fired appliances with the kitchen equipment plans (e.g. the deck oven does not indicate any gas requirement and there is no "Drago" oven shown on the kitchen equipment list on sheet Q102). Reference: Section 402.1, IFGC 2012.] 2. Three of the five hand sinks are directly-connected. Provide direct connections for the remaining two hand sinks. [Initial comment: Provide a direct connection to the building drainage system for all plumbing fixtures except as allowed by Chapter 8, IPC 2012. Reference: Section 301.3, IPC 2012.] 3. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Provide calculations showing how the PEX water supply tubing has been sized. Reference: Sections 604.1 and 604.3, IPC 201.] 4. The mixing valve noted in detail 9/PE502 is set for 135 degrees Fahrenheit. Provide tempered water for the restroom lavatories using approved devices conforming to ASSE 1070 and set no higher than 110 degrees Fahrenheit. Reference: Sections 416.5 and 607.1.2, IPC 2012. Note: correct the location of the gas shut off valve in detail 9/PE502 per Section 408.4, IFGC 2012; the sediment trap is to be located downstream of the shut off valve. [Initial comment: Clarify the water heater detail 9/PE502; it appears as if the only output is for 110 degrees Fahrenheit water. Provide a specification for the proposed ASSE 1070-listed thermostatic mixing valve and verify that it is capable of accommodating the required hot water demand without excessive pressure drop. Reference: Sections 303.2 and 604.3, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.] 5. General Note #3 applies only to drink dispensing appliances; specify the type of backflow prevention device required for the other appliances having water connections. [Initial comment: Appliances (e.g. ovens, ice makers, etc) to be directly connected to the water supply system that do not have listed, integral backflow preventers or integral air gaps conforming to Section 608.13.1, IPC require backflow prevention. Specify the type of backflow prevention device required for each water connection. Reference: Sections 608.1 and 608.3, IPC 2012.] 6. Clarify the size of the proposed gravity grease interceptor. The civil drawing calls for a 1060-gallon unit, the calculations on sheet PE-601 calls for a 660-gallon unit, the grease interceptor schedule on sheet PE-601 calls for a 1000-gallon unit and the detail on sheet PE-501 shows a 1000-gallon interceptor. Replot sheet PE-501 so that detail 1 is legible and provide a registrant's seal for the sheet. [Initial comment: Provide sizing calculations for the gravity grease interceptor. Coordinate the size of the interceptor with the civil site plan. Reference: Section 1003.3, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.] 7. Provide a civil site plan that shows the termination point of the primary roof drain. [Initial comment: Clarify the termination point for the primary roof drain leader. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] 8. An approved development plan is not to be used for construction of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to the building, building sewer, site lighting, or electrical service to the building). The construction of the on-site utilities may be included with the permit for constructing the building or as a separate permit. |
| 07/10/2015 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/10/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. See Section 307.2.1, IMC 2012 as amended by the City of Tucson for approved termination points for condensate drains. [Initial comment: Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drains for the roof top units. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2012 as amended by the City of Tucson.] 2. Clarify which areas were used to calculate the required ventilation for the building. [Initial comment: Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation using the current code. Reference: Section 403.2, IMC 2012.] 3. Not all of the cooking appliances have been located under hoods or have been directly vented (e.g. kitchen items 04, 06, and 08; a total of 13 appliances). [Initial comment: Provide general room exhaust for any cooking appliance that does not require the installation of a Type II hood. The minimum exhaust rate shall be 0.70 CFM per square foot, using a minimum area of 100 square feet for each individual appliance. Reference: Section 507.2.2, IMC 2012.] 4. There are no deferred submittals for the installation of kitchen hoods, show that the Type I hood is supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 507.6, IMC 2012. [Initial comment: Provide structural calculations and details to show that the Type I hood is supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 507.6, IMC 2012 (the hood hanging weight plus the weight of personnel working in or on the hood). Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2012.] |
| 07/13/2015 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | While the electrical review for the current submittal is approved, due to the potential modifications necessary to address comments associated with the reviews of other disciplines the electrical workflow is denoted as denied in order to verify that those modifications will not adversely impact the electrical review. |
| 07/14/2015 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Kneaders @ Rio Verde Village T15CM2963 Building Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 14, 2015 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. It appears that the plans match development package DP15-0065 but cannot be approved until the development package is approved. 3. Zoning will not approve until all other PDSD agencies have approved the building plan. 4. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 07/24/2015 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Engineering can recommend approval after DP15-0065 is approved. |