Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T15CM02869
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/06/2015 | AROMERO4 | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 05/06/2015 | AROMERO4 | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 05/06/2015 | AROMERO4 | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Needs Review | |
| 06/02/2015 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET A1; BUILDING CODE DATA; OCCUPANCY LOADS PLAN: THE OCCUPANCY LOADS PLAN INDICATES A GROUND FLOOR AREA OF 2349 SF (1150 B + 1199 S-1), WHILE THE BUILDING CODE DATA INDICATES 2285 SF GROUND FLOOR. PLEASE CLARIFY. 2. SHEET A1; BUILDING CODE DATA: THE MEZZANINE AREA IS LISTED AS 794 SF, WHICH IS 35% OF THE GROUND FLOOR (AS OPPOSED TO THE 62% STATED). PLEASE CLARIFY. 3. SHEET A1; FLOOR PLAN: KEYED NOTE 13 INDICATES THE WOOD FRAMED MEZZANINE AS DENOTED IS TO BE REMOVED. IS THIS THE ENTIRE MEZZANINE (DETAIL 10/A2 STILL INDICATES A MEZZANINE)? PLEASE CLARIFY. 4. SHEET A1; BUILDING CODE DATA: A NOTE INDICATES NO SEPARATION WALLS ARE REQUIRED WITHIN THIS SPACE. IS A SEPARATION REQUIRED BETWEEN THIS TENANT SPACE AND AN ADJACENT SPACE WITH AN OCCUPANCY TYPE THAT REQUIRES SEPARATION PER THE IBC TABLE 508.4, OR THE TOTAL SF EXCEEDS THE ALLOWABLE FOR NON SEPARATED USES? PLEASE VERIFY. 5. SHEET A1; FLOOR PLAN: A DOOR 108 IS INDICATED AT THE INTERIOR WALL BETWEEN THE OFFICE AND THE WAREHOUSE AND INDICATED AGAIN AT THE SOUTH EXTERIOR WALL. PLEASE CLARIFY. 6. SHEET A2; DETAILS 3 AND 9: THE DIAGONAL BRACING INDICATES 2 #6 TEK SCREWS TO THE CEILING. THIS WILL NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTION 1607.14 (5 PSF HORIZONTAL LOAD RESISTANCE). CONTINUE THE DIAGONAL BRACING TO THE STRUCTURE ABOVE, AND PROVIDE A DETAIL ON THE DRAWINGS FOR THIS CONNECTION. 7. SHEET A2; DETAIL 4: INDICATE THE CONNECTION (SIZE AND SPACING) FOR THE WALL STUDS TO THE CMU WALL. 8. SHEET A2; DETAIL 8: PLEASE PROVIDE HORIZONTAL OR DIAGONAL BRACING AT THE TOP OF THE METAL STUDS IN THE WALL TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTION 1607.14. 9. GENERAL: PLEASE VERIFY ON THE DRAWINGS THE MEANS OF EGRESS ILLUMINATION MEETS THE IBC SECTION 1006 REQUIREMENTS, AND THE EXIT SIGNS MEET THE IBC SECTION 1011 REQUIREMENTS. 10. SHEET A1; KEYED NOTES TO FLOOR PLAN: NOTE 13 INDICATES THE MEZZANINE FLOOR JOISTS RUN PARALLEL TO THE DEMISING WALLS. IT APPEARS ON THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS THE FLOOR JOISTS ARE PERPENDICULAR TO THE DEMISING WALLS ON GRIDS 1 AND 2. PLEASE VERIFY. 11. SHEET A1; FLOOR PLAN: PLEASE INDICATE THE STAIRS ON THE PLAN. 12. GENERAL: IT APPEARS FROM THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS THAT THE "MEZZANINE" MIGHT ACTUALLY BE A SECOND FLOOR OVER THE WAREHOUSE AND THE OFFICES. PLEASE CLARIFY. 13. GENERAL: THE DRAWINGS INDICATE 'FINE SUPPLY PARTS FOR ELEVATOR EQUIPMENT' ARE STORED IN THE WAREHOUSE. ARE THERE STORAGE RACKS FOR THE EQUIPMENT? ARE ANY HAZARDOUS MATERIALS (PER THE IBC SECTION 414) INCLUDED WITH THIS EQUIPMENT? PLEASE CLARIFY AND LIST MATERIALS AND QUANTITIES ON THE DRAWINGS. 14. GENERAL: IS THIS BUILDING THE SAME AS DEPICTED IN THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS? THEY APPEAR TO HAVE DIFFERENT GRIDLINES AND DIFFERENT CONFIGURATIONS. PLEASE CLARIFY. 15. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |