Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Permit Number - T15CM02709
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/14/2015 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Finley Distributing T15CM02708 & 15CM02709 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 14, 2015 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. The building plans cannot be approved until the development package, DP15-0070, has been approved. 3. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 06/02/2015 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Building plans cannot be approved until Development Package DP15-0070 has been approved. |
| 06/05/2015 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET S1.0; GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES (FOUNDATIONS): FOUNDATION NOTE 1 INDICATES A SOIL REPORT WAS USED IN THE FOUNDATION DESIGN. PLEASE PROVIDE THAT REPORT FOR REVIEW. 2. SHEET S2.0 (JOIST SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PURLIN DESIGN): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A ZEE 8X2.5X12 GAGE PURLIN, WHILE THE JOIST SCHEDULE INDICATES A 8X2.5X14 GA. PLEASE CLARIFY. 3. SHEET S2.0 (CANOPY FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (BEAM AND COLUMN DESIGN): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE DIFFERENT BEAM AND COLUMN SIZES THAT INDICATED ON THE CANOPY FRAMING PLAN AND THE COLUMN SCHEDULE. PLEASE CLARIFY. 4. SHEET S2.0 (COLUMN SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (MAIN COLUMN BASE PLATE DESIGN): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A COLUMN BASE PLATE SIZE OF 23"X23"X1.25" THICKNESS, WHILE THE COLUMN SCHEDULE INDICATES A 1 1/4"X22"X1'-10" BASE PLATE. PLEASE CLARIFY. 5. SHEET S2.0 (COLUMN SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (ANCHOR BOLT DESIGN): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE 6-1 1/4" DIAMETER X 24" EMBEDMENT DEPTH BOLTS, WHILE THE COLUMN SCHEDULE INDICATES (6) 1" DIAMETER ANCHOR BOLTS (24" EMBEDMENT). PLEASE CLARIFY. 6. SHEET S2.0 (FOOTING SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (RETAINING WALL FOOTING DESIGN): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A 16" FOOTING DEPTH, WHILE THE FOOTING SCHEDULE INDICATES A 12" HEIGHT. PLEASE CLARIFY. 7. SHEET S4.0 (DETAIL 201); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (BEAM TO COLUMN CONNECTION DESIGN): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A 1.25" COLUMN TOP PLATE, WHILE THE DETAIL (NOTE 5) INDICATES A 1" CAP PLATE. PLEASE CLARIFY. 8. SHEET S4.0; DETAIL 201: THE CAP PLATE INDICATES A 1"X8"X REQUIRED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE PLATE LENGTH ON THE DETAIL. 9. SHEET a1.0; ENLARGED PLAN: PLEASE VERIFY THE SPACE BETWEEN THE EXISTING ROOF ABOVE AND THE NEW ROOF BELOW FOR FIRE PROTECTION IN CONCEALED SPACES. 10. SHEET a1.0; GENERAL NOTES: NOTE 15.1 REFERENCES A SPRINKLER SYSTEM. PLEASE INCLUDE THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM TYPE TO BE INSTALLED. 11. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/08/2015 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |