Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Permit Number - T15CM01878
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/24/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Comment not resolved. [Second comment: Comment not resolved; the envelope components do not correspond to the drawings (e.g. multiple window and wall types are not included in the COMcheck analysis).] [Initial comment: Portions of the building shell being modified in this activity do not appear to have been previously conditioned. Section R101.4.5, IECC 2012 requires these spaces to be brought into full compliance with the current energy code. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Tucson. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections R103.2 and R401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.] 2. Comment not resolved. [Second comment: Coordinate the load calculations with the unit tag numbers on the drawings and show how the U-values of the walls were determined.] [Initial comment: Revise the heating and cooling load calculations used to justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project by coordinating the wall construction used in the calculations with the wall construction shown on the architectural drawings. Reference: Section R403.6, IECC 2012, and Section 312.1, IMC 2012.] 3. Show the ventilation calculations and the operating parameters for the whole house ventilation. [Second comment: Section R403.5, IECC 2012 requires mechanical ventilation, not natural ventilation.] [Initial comment: Clarify how mechanical ventilation is to be provided to each loft. Reference: Section R403.5, IECC 2012 and Section 403.3, IMC 2012.] |
| 11/25/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 11/25/2015 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; COVER SHEET: THE NOTE 1a SHOULD BE ADDED TO SHEET C1. THIS WILL REQUIRE A FIELD VERIFICATION OF THE TYPE OF THE EXISTING ROOF JOISTS TO ENSURE LOADING REQUIREMENTS WILL BE MET. 2. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; COVER SHEET: THE NOTE 1b SHOULD BE ADDED TO SHEET C1. THIS WILL REQUIRE A FIELD VERIFICATION OF THE FOOTING SIZE AT THE STEEL COLUMN TO ENSURE LOADING REQUIREMENTS WILL BE MET. 3. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; COVER SHEET: THE NOTE 1c SHOULD BE ADDED TO SHEET C1. THIS WILL REQUIRE A FIELD VERIFICATION OF THE CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB THICKNESS TO ENSURE LOADING REQUIREMENTS WILL BE MET. 4. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 3); SHEET A1 OR A2 (FLOOR PLAN): INDICATE ON THE PLANS THE EXISTING BEAMS REFERENCED AS B1, B2, AND B3 (IN THE CALCULATIONS). 5. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 53); SHEET A2 (FLOOR PLAN): INDICATE A NEW LINTEL (TWO ANGLES 4X4X1/4) AT THE WINDOW OPENINGS W3, W4, W5, AND W6 ON THE SOUTH WALL. 6. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 54); SHEET A1 (FLOOR PLAN): INDICATE A NEW LINTEL (TWO ANGLES 4X4X1/4) AT THE DOOR OPENING 13. 7. GENERAL: AT NEW OPENINGS IN THE EXISTING BLOCK WALLS (UP TO A MAXIMUM CLEAR WIDTH OF 6 FEET), INDICATE A NEW LINTEL (TWO ANGLES 4X4X1/4) ON THE PLANS. 8. GENERAL: AT OPENINGS IN INTERIOR STUD BEARING WALLS (AT THE SECOND FLOOR), PROVIDE A NOTE ON THE PLAN (A2) TO USE 2-2X6 HEADERS AT OPENINGS UP TO A MAXIMUM CLEAR WIDTH OF 5'-0" AND 2-2X4 AT THE HEADER BEARING. 9. GENERAL: AT OPENINGS IN INTERIOR STUD BEARING WALLS (AT THE FIRST FLOOR), PROVIDE A NOTE ON THE PLAN (A1) TO USE 2-2X6 HEADERS AT OPENINGS UP TO A MAXIMUM CLEAR WIDTH OF 4'-0" AND 2-2X4 AT THE HEADER BEARING. 10. GENERAL: AT OPENINGS IN INTERIOR STUD NON-BEARING WALLS (AT THE FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR), PROVIDE A NOTE ON THE PLANS (A1 AND A2) TO USE 2-2X6 HEADERS AT OPENINGS UP TO A MAXIMUM CLEAR WIDTH OF 8'-0" AND 2-2X4 AT THE HEADER BEARING. 11. GENERAL: ON SHEET A1, ADD A NOTE FOR THE SECOND FLOOR DIAPHRAGM TO USE ¾" PLYWOOD (UNBLOCKED) WITH 10d NAILS AT 6" O.C. AT THE PLYWOOD EDGES AND 10" O.C. AT INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS. 12. GENERAL: ON SHEET A2, ADD A NOTE FOR THE ROOF DIAPHRAGM TO USE 5/8" PLYWOOD (UNBLOCKED) WITH 8d NAILS AT 6" O.C. AT THE PLYWOOD EDGES AND 12" O.C. AT INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS. 13. GENERAL: PLESE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 11/25/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 11/30/2015 | SSHIELD1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 11/30/2015 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 8th Avenue Lofts - Building Plan T15CM01878 Building Plan (3rd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 30, 2015 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. It appears that the building plans match the approved development package, DP15-0049, but until the building plans have been approved by all other PDSD review agencies Zoning cannot approve the building plans.. 3. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 12/03/2015 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP must be approved first. |