Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Permit Number - T15CM01878
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/08/2015 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Will approve the building plan upon approval of the development plan package, DP15-0049. JG |
| 09/10/2015 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/14/2015 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 8th Avenue Lofts - Building Plan T15CM01878 Building Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 14, 2015 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. The building plans cannot be approved until the development package, DP15-0049, has been approved. 3. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 09/24/2015 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/24/2015 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | GENERAL: THE SCOPE OF THE COMMENTS FROM THE FIRST REVIEW IS COMPLEX. PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL OF THE REVIEW COMMENTS FROM THAT FIRST REVIEW. GENERAL: COMMENTS FROM THE FIRST REVIEW ARE LISTED HERE: 1. This project is a Change of Use from SFR (IBC R3?) to R-2 Apartments with a mixed use of S-1/S-2 (should probably be called art gallery/work areas) and possibly a SFR space, not yet defined in these documents, that will required certain current 2012 IBC code compliances. As per section 3408 of the 2012 IBC, non- compliance with all the requirements of this code may be permitted provided the new or proposed use is less hazardous, based upon life and fire risk, than the existing use and approval of the building official. a. Please redefine the occupancy classification as a separated, mixed-use of R2, R3 or SFR and S-1 or S-2. Please clarify. Reference section 508 Mixed Use and Occupancy for clarifications and requirements. b. Please provide an allowable building area calculation as per section 508.4.2 showing the sum of the ratios of the actual building areas does not exceed 1. c. As the building has a Certificate of Occupancy issued for a Single Family Residence, please provide a structural analysis of the building showing that it complies with Chapter 16 of the 2012 IBC. d. Provide all accessible requirements as per Section 3411. e. An impact fee assessment is being also considered and the results will be provided to the owner once complete. 2. As per section 1014.2.4 of the 2012 IBC, the means of egress may not pass through a storage room. 3. Provide a listing of Type "A" and/or Type "B" units as required by Section 1107.6.2 of the 2012 IBC and identify each unit shown on the floor plan. a. Include all accessible requirements including clearances. 4. Please provide a existing floor plan. 5. Please show all architecture features of the space located in the far south west corner and define it's use, R2, R3, SFR or something. 6. Please 7. Please reference the 2012 IBC, Section 420 for R2 fire separation and sprinkler requirements. a. The wall legend provided is not very accurate: toilet walls are 2 hr rated, perimeter CMU not identified at all, some stair wells indicated as 2 hour protected and some are not rated. Please identify all fire walls as required by code with a linear symbol and legend. Please show this on a new exiting floor plan. Show all exiting required for this building as per code. 8. Please provide large scale details of all the existing and new stair wells showing all code compliance and accessible requirements as per section 4311. 9. Finish the exterior and interior elevations on sheet A3. 10. Provide compliance with section 1029 for emergency escape and rescue. 11. Provide an occupancy load calculation and show total occupancy. 12. Provide structural calculations for any new roof mounted HVAC equipment and and water heaters either wall mounted or suspended from structural above. END OF REVIEW |
| 09/30/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Revise the minimum size of the fonts used on the drawings to 3/32-inches. 2. Comment not resolved; the envelope components do not correspond to the drawings (e.g. multiple window and wall types are not included in the COMcheck analysis). [Initial comment: Portions of the building shell being modified in this activity do not appear to have been previously conditioned. Section R101.4.5, IECC 2012 requires these spaces to be brought into full compliance with the current energy code. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Tucson. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections R103.2 and R401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.] 3. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: The NFRC certification numbers (CPD#) have not been included in this submittal. Factory-manufactured windows are required to have certificates attesting to their compliance to NFRC Standards 100 and 200 and can be provided by the manufacturer or found at www.nfrc.org. Provide NFRC fenestration product ratings for the U-factor and the SHGC values on COMcheck or use the appropriate default U-factor and SHGC values from Tables R303.1.3 (1), R303.1.3 (2) and R303.1.3.(3), IECC 2012. Reference: Section R303.1.3, IECC 2012.] 4. Coordinate the load calculations with the unit tag numbers on the drawings and show how the U-values of the walls were determined. [Initial comment: Revise the heating and cooling load calculations used to justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project by coordinating the wall construction used in the calculations with the wall construction shown on the architectural drawings. Reference: Section R403.6, IECC 2012, and Section 312.1, IMC 2012.] 5. Comment not resolved; see previous comment. [Initial comment: Provide justification for installing HVAC units having total cooling capacities that exceed the total cooling loads shown in the submitted calculations. Reference: Section R403.6, IECC 2012.] 6. Section R403.5, IECC 2012 requires mechanical ventilation, not natural ventilation. [Initial comment: Clarify how mechanical ventilation is to be provided to each loft. Reference: Section R403.5, IECC 2012 and Section 403.3, IMC 2012.] 7. Comment not resolved, what size are the ducts and how are they routed to the roof. [Initial comment: Clarify the duct sizes, duct routes, and termination points for the bathroom exhaust fans and the kitchen exhaust hoods. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] 8. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Provide access to any mechanical equipment located on the roof. Reference: Section 306.5, IMC 2012.] 9. Comment not resolved; how is the condensate routed to the lavatory tailpiece? [Initial comment: Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drains from the mechanical units. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2012 as amended by the City of Tucson.] 10. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Show the size, route, and termination points of the dryer exhaust ducts. Reference: Sections 504.1, 504.2, 504.4 and, 504.6, IMC 2012.] |
| 09/30/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Revise the minimum size of the fonts used on the drawings to 3/32-inches. [Initial comment: Provide plumbing plans for the new work, including water isometrics and waste and vent isometrics. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] 2. Provide a site plan that shows the water meter, backflow preventer, and the water service to the building. Note that Tucson Water does not allow the use of manifolded water meters or multiple meters serving one address. [Initial comment: Show how the new water piping relates to the existing water supply system and show that the additional connections do not cause the existing piping to be overloaded. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] 3. The architectural drawings do not clearly show that the shower enclosures will be constructed in compliance with the requirements of Section 417.5.2, IPC 2012. [Initial comment: If the showers do not have pre-fabricated receptors, provide details to show that the construction of the receptors complies with the requirements of Section 417.5.2, IPC 2012.] 4. No piping materials have been specified. [Initial comment: Show the size, route, and termination of the T&P relief pipe from the water heater. Note that PVC is not approved for use as a relief pipe; see Table 605.4, IPC 2012 for approved materials. Reference: Section 504, IPC 2012.] 5. Provide the manufacturer's listing information that indicates that a reduced pressure principle backflow preventer has a pressure drop of only 9 PSI. [Initial comment: Revise the water pressure calculations to include the pressure drop due to the reduced pressure backflow preventer. Reference: Section 604.1, IPC 2012.] 6. No piping materials have been specified. [Initial comment: For the use of PEX tubing, provide a branch tube sizing chart showing the correct size of PEX tubing to be used as a substitute for the copper pipe shown on the drawings. Reference: Sections 303.2 and 604.3, IPC 2012.] 7. No piping materials have been specified. [Initial comment: Verify that the pipe sizes called out to serve the lofts will not result in water velocities greater than that recommended by the pipe manufacturer (e.g. limit the water velocity to less than 8 FPS for copper, PEX, or CPVC piping). For example, at the water demand for two lofts, 17 GPM, a 1" PEX tube has a flow velocity of 9.5 FPS. Reference: Table 604.3, IPC 2012.] 8. The required shut off valves have not been shown. [Initial comment: Provide water shut off valves for each dwelling unit, accessible within the dwelling unit it serves. Reference: Section 606.1, IPC 2012.] 9. Comment not addressed; show the building sewer and its connection to the public sewer on the site plan along with the required cleanouts. [Initial comment: Provide cleanouts for the building sewer; the cleanouts shall not be located greater than 100-feet apart, measured from the upstream entrance of the cleanout. Reference: Section 708.3.1, IPC 2012.] 10. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole and the first floor elevation. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.] |
| 09/30/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide a site plan that shows the water meter, backflow preventer, and the water service to the building. [Initial comment: Reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies are required at the water meter for multi-use commercial buildings. Reference: Chapter XXVII, Article V, Section 27-72, the Tucson Code, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf] |
| 10/06/2015 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 11/09/2015 | KROBLES1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Needs Review |