Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T15CM01791
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/24/2015 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | TFD needs the DP comments addressed before we can approve this project. |
| 04/03/2015 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET TS1; CODE ANALYSIS DATA (GENERAL BUILDING SUMMARY): THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM REQUIREMENT REFERENCES SECTION 1004.3.2.1. PLEASE REVISE THAT REFERENCE TO THE 2012 IBC. 2. SHEET TS1: PLEASE LIST ON THIS SHEET THE TYPES OF MATERIALS/ITEMS STORED IN THIS FACILITY. THIS PERTAINS TO THE AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTION 903.2.9 AND THE QUANTITIES OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ALLOWED PER SECTION 311.2. 3. SHEET TS1; CODE ANALYSIS DATA (GENERAL BUILDING SUMMARY): THE ALLOWABLE SF IS INDICATED TO BE 18,000. THE ALLOWABLE AREA CALCULATION ON THIS SHEET INDICATES 9000 SF. PLEASE CLARIFY. 4. SHEET TS1; CODE ANALYSIS DATA (GENERAL BUILDING SUMMARY): THE TABLE INDICATES THIS IS NOT A SEPARATED USE, AND IT IS NOT A NON-SEPARATED USE. PLEASE CLARIFY. THE FLOOR PLAN ON SHEET A1.0 INDICATES A ONE HOUR SEPARATION WALL BETWEEN THE AUTO SERVICE PORTION AND THE WAREHOUSE. PLEASE CLARIFY. 5. SHEET TS1; CODE ANALYSIS DATA (GENERAL BUILDING SUMMARY): THE DATA INDICATES THIS IS A NON SPRINKLERED BUILDING. PLEASE REVIEW THE IBC SECTION 406.8.6 FOR AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS IN REPAIR GARAGES IN CONJUNCTION WITH SECTION 903.2.9.1 AND PROVIDE THAT ANALYSIS ON THIS SHEET. 6. SHEET TS1; CODE STUDY (#6a): PLEASE REPLACE THE ? WITH THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED EXITS. 7. SHEET TS1; CODE STUDY (#6): PLEASE REVISIT THE CALCULATED OCCUPANCY LOAD. THE OCCUPANCY LOAD IS BASED ON A WAREHOUSE USAGE (500 SF/PERSON). THE PRIMARY USE IS THE AUTO REPAIR AREA, WITH AN ACCESSORY STORAGE AREA. PLEASE CLARIFY. 8. SHEET TS1; CODE STUDY (#6c): THE PANIC HARDWARE INDICATES YES, BUT THE DOOR HARDWARE (SHEET A2.0) DOES NOT LIST ANY PANIC HARDWARE. PLEASE CLARIFY. 9. GENERAL: PLEASE REVIEW THE IBC SECTION 406.8 FOR OTHER REPAIR GARAGE REQUIREMENTS FOR VENTILATION, FLOOR SURFACE, HEATING EQUIPMENT, ETC. 10. SHEET A1.0; PARTITION TYPES: IN THE DESCRIPTION OF PARTITION 6B, PLEASE PROVIDE THE WALL STUD SPACING. 11. SHEET A1.0; DETAIL 4: PLEASE PROVIDE THE DIAGONAL BRACING SIZE, SPACING, AND CONNECTION TO THE STRUCTURE ABOVE. 12. SHEET A1.0; DETAIL 4: PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON HOW THE HORIZONTAL BRACING CONNECTS TO THE BOTTOM OF THE ROOF STRUCTURE. IN A METAL BUILDING, THE PURLINS AT THE ROOF ARE TYPICALLY ZEE OR CEE SECTIONS. REFERENCE SHEET S1.3. 13. SHEETS A1.0, A2.0, AND A3.0; KEY NOTES: NOTES 16.2 AND 16.3 WERE NOT LOCATED. PLEASE VERIFY. 14. SHEET A3.0; BUILDING SECTION 6: KEY NOTE 6.2 REFERENCES THE METAL STUD FRAMING. ADD TO THIS NOTE TO REFERENCE STRUCTURAL FOR FRAMING SIZE AND SPACING. 15. SHEET S2.0; WALL LINTEL SCHEDULE: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE THE VERBIAGE AT THE DETAILS. 16. SHEET S2.0; RIGID FRAME COLUMN REACTIONS: NOTE 3 REFERENCES A DETAIL 17/S1.2. PLEASE REVISE THE REFERENCE NUMBER. 17. SHEET S2.0; FOUNDATION PLAN NOTES: NOTES 3, 4, AND 8 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. PLEASE VERIFY. 18. SHEET S2.0; END WALL POST REACTIONS: THE NOTE REFERENCES A DETAIL 17/S1.2. PLEASE REVISE THE REFERENCE NUMBER. 19. SHEET S3.0; DETAIL 106: WHERE IS THIS DETAIL CUT ON THE PLAN OR REFERENCED? PLEASE VERIFY. 20. SHEET S3.0; DETAIL 202: THIS DETAIL INDICATES A GUARDRAIL PER THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. WILL THE ARCHITECT PLEASE PROVIDE SUCH A DETAIL ON THE DRAWINGS INDICATING THE RAIL POST SIZE, SPACING, AND HOW THE POST IS CONNECTED TO THE FLOOR? INCLUDE IN THE DETAIL THE HORIZONTAL MEMBERS SIZE, SPACING, AND CONNECTION TO THE POST. 21. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 04/09/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Replot the plumbing plan to make the background legible. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 2. Verify that the proposed ¾" water service to the new building is adequate to move 10 GPM at a pressure drop of only 2.3 PSI per 100-feet. Note: include the continuous demand (i.e. not a fixture unit) for the three evaporative coolers when determining the total flow to the building. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 3. Provide the minimum plumbing facilities required by Table 2902.1, IBC 2012, for business occupancy (a bottled water dispenser is not recognized as a substitute for a drinking fountain). Reference: Sections 1109.5 and 2902.1, IBC 2012. 4. The proposed mixing valve, Watts L111, is an obsolete product and it appears that it is no longer listed. Provide a mixing valve that is listed to ASSE 1070. Reference: Sections 303.4 and 607.1.2, IPC 2012. 5. The water heater support platform appears to be shown located within the access space for the lavatory. Verify that sufficient access is available for the lavatory and for the door to swing open. Reference: Section 405.3.1 and 405.3.3, IPC 2012. 6. Termination of the excess pressure relief from the water heater over an elevated service sink is not approved location. Reference: Section 504.6 (6), IPC 2012. |
| 04/09/2015 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please show full compliance with City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code. |
| 04/09/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 04/09/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Replot the mechanical plan to make the background legible. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 2. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Tucson. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections C103.2 and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. 3. Show how the "Additional Efficiency Package Requirements" noted in Section C406, IECC 2012 is to be addressed. Reference: Section C401.2, IECC 2012. 4. Provide NFRC fenestration product ratings for the U-factor and the SHGC values on COMcheck or use the appropriate default U-factor and SHGC values from Tables C303.1.3 (1), C303.1.3 (2) and C303.1.3.(3), IECC 2012. Reference: Section C303.1.3, IECC 2012. |
| 04/13/2015 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: T15CM01791 2865 E. Ginter Road Building plans for a Warehouse/Storage TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 13, 2015 DUE DATE: April 17, 2015 COMMENTS: 01. Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve them at this time. While the building size and height is consistent with what is depicted on the current version of the Development Package, the development package must be fully approved before zoning can sign off on the building plans as it relates to the zoning review purview of the building. 02. If a copy of the development package is to be included in the building package, ensure that it is an approved and PDSD signed off copy. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/14/2015 | AROMERO4 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |