Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T15CM01651
Parcel: 13323193C

Address:
750 N KOLB RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI

Permit Number - T15CM01651
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/16/2015 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
04/16/2015 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
04/16/2015 DAN SANTA CRUZ ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
04/20/2015 CPIERCE1 WWM REVIEW Completed
04/20/2015 CPIERCE1 COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Passed PER RON BROWN
05/04/2015 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Guadalajara Fiesta Grill - Storage Room and Trellis Additions
T15CM01651
Building Plan (2nd Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 4, 2015

1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. The building plans cannot be approved until the development package, DP13-0075, has been approved.

3. There is a canopy structure shown along the south side of the building on this plan that is not shown on the development package.

4. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956
05/07/2015 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Resubmittal Comment 1: The DP package has not been approved therefore the included site drawings may not be correct.
2. Resubmittal Comment 12: Please redistribute the accessible seating as required by the 20112 IBC, Section 1108.2.9, 1109.11 and 2009 ICC A117.1, Section 902.
a. This effects all the different types of dining seating, indoor and outdoor bar and kitchen bar.
3. Reference comment 1 above.
4. Resubmittal Comment 14: Please provide a wall section through this area.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
5. Please provide an EXITING plan. Please include the existing patio.
SHEET A1.1 AND A5.0
6. The building sections 1/A5.0 and 2/A5.0 as referenced from A1.1 are void of any architectural detail and need to be finished showing the bar, the window bar, dining seating and pony walls, the open kitchen and storage racks and etc.
SHEET A1.2
6. Once DP package has been approved, the new canopy entry floor plan will need to be updated.
7. Please provide detail numbers for all partial plans so as to reference to them from other smaller scaled plans.
SHEET A8.0
8. Detail 1: As per the 2012 IPC, Section 419.2, urinals shall not be substituted for more than 50% of the required water closets. Please provide 2 water closets in the men's room.
9. As per the 2009 ICC A117.1, Section 603.2.2 toilet room doors shall not swing into any of the required floor space or clearances for any fixture. Please reconcile the men's room door.
10. Needs special inspections certifications.
END OF REVIEW
05/08/2015 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Completed
05/08/2015 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Revise the description of K58 in the equipment schedule from indirectly wasted to directly-connected. [Initial comment: Clarify the reason for using an indirect waste connection for the soiled dish table sink (K15), the drop-in sinks (K20), and the under-bar hand sink (K58). The kitchen equipment schedule on sheet K2.1 calls for a direct waste connection for both K15 and K20; under the IPC, hand sinks are always installed with a direct connection. Reference: Section 802.1, IPC 2012.]
05/08/2015 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. A revised energy code analysis for the building envelope has not been included with this submittal. [Initial comment: Revise the energy code analysis for the building envelope, coordinating the building components used in the analysis with those shown on the drawing (e.g. multiple roof types, doors, etc.). Reference: Section C303.1, IECC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.]
2. The NFRC certification numbers have not been included in this submittal. [Initial comment: The NFRC certification numbers (CPD#) have not been included in this submittal. Factory-manufactured windows are required to have certificates attesting to their compliance to NFRC Standards 100 and 200 and can be provided by the manufacturer or found at www.nfrc.org. For site assembled commercial products, the NFRC component modeling approach program enables commercial window manufacturers to produce bid reports to prove energy performance prior to being awarded a job and provide finalized label certificates once the product has been installed. Fenestration performance reports based on AAMA 507 are based on energy simulations only (no actual testing) and are not acceptable. If the NFRC fenestration product ratings for the U-factor and the SHGC values are not available, use the appropriate default U-factor and SHGC values from Tables C303.1.3 (1), C303.1.3 (2) and C303.1.3.(3), IECC 2012 in the COMcheck analysis. Reference: Section C303.1.3, IECC 2012.]