Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T15CM01651
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/19/2015 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please indicate the doors that will have panic hardware. |
| 03/24/2015 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 1. SHEET TS1; REFERENCE SITE PLAN: PLEASE PROVIDE A NORTH ARROW ON THE PLAN. 2. SHEET TS1; PROJECT CODE REVIEW: PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON THIS SHEET FOR THE MINIMUM EGRESS WIDTH PER THE IBC SECTION 1005. 3. SHEET TS1; PROJECT CODE REVIEW: PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON THIS SHEET FOR THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF REQUUIRED PLUMBING FIXTURES PER THE IBC TABLE 2902.1. 4. SHEET TS1 (SITE PLAN); SHEET A1.2 (ENTRY CANOPY FLOOR PLAN): IT APPEARS FROM THE SITE PLAN THE NEW RAMP IS ACCESSED IN THE PARKING AREA. PLEASE CLARIFY. 5. SHEET A1.0; FLOOR PLAN: IS THE PATIO PART OF THEIS PROJECT? WHY IS IT NOT INDICATED WITH THE FLOOR PLAN? PLEASE CLARIFY. 6. SHEET A1.1; PARTITION TYPE 3: PLEASE PROVIDE THE NEW 2X4 WOOD STUD SPACING. 7. SHEET A1.1; PARTITION TYPE 7: PLEASE PROVIDE THE NEW 2X4 WOOD STUD SPACING. 8. SHEET A1.1; PARTITION TYPES 11 AND 13: SINCE THESE WALLS EXTEND TO THE ROOF DECK, THE 2X4 KICKERS ARE NOT REQUIRED. PLEASE REMOVE THEM FROM THE DESCRIPTIONS. 9. SHEET A1.1; PARTITION TYPES 14, 18, AND 19: ADD THE 2X4 KICKERS TO THESE DESCRIPTIONS. 10. SHEET A1.1; PARTITION TYPE 17: PLEASE INDICATE THE WALL EXTENDS TO THE BOTTOM OF THE ROOF DECK. 11. SHEET A1.1; PARTITION TYPES: ARE ALL OF THE TYPES LISTED USED ON THIS PROJECT? PLEASE VERIFY AND REMOVE THE TYPES NOT USED. 12. SHEET A1.1; FLOOR PLAN: PLEASE PROVIDE A CALCULATION ON THE PLAN INDICATING THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SEATS USING THE IBC SECTION 1109.11, AND INDICATE ON THE PLAN THE LOCATION OF THOSE SEATS. 13. SHEET A1.2; FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES: SEVERAL NOTES REFERENCE THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR MORE INFORMATION. PLEASE PROVIDE THOSE REFERENCED SHEETS IN THIS REVIEW SET. 14. SHEET A1.3; DETAIL 5: PLEASE PROVIDE THE DETAIL. 15. SHEET A6.0; DOOR SCHEDULE: WHERE ARE THE HARDWARE SET NUMBERS INDICATED IN THE DOOR SCHEDULE? PLEASE PROVIDE. 16. SHEET A6.0; DOOR NOTES: NOTES 3 AND 4 DISCUSS PANIC HARDWARE. PLEASE INDICATE ON THE DOOR SCHEDULE WHERE THE PANIC HARDWARE IS REQUIRED. 17. SHEET A8.0; RESTROOM PLAN: ELEVATION INDICATORS ON THE PLAN SHOULD BE REVERSED FOR ELEVATIONS C AND D. PLEASE VERIFY. 18. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. STRUCTURAL REVIEW 1. SHEET S2.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); FOUNDATION KEYNOTES: NOTE 1 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. PLEASE VERIFY. 2. SHEET S2.0; FOUNDATION PLAN: PLEASE COMPLETE THE SECTION CUT AT GRIDS 1 AND E AND AT GRIDS 1 AND C.9. 3. SHEET S2.0; FOUNDATION PLAN: PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOOTING MARTK AT GRIDS 3 AND A. 4. SHEET S2.0; COLUMN SCHEDULE: IS THE 8' X 8" BASE PLATE LARGE ENOUGH TO MAINTAIN THE REQUIRED EDGE DISTANCE TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE BOLTS? PLEASE VERIFY. 5. SHEET S2.1; FRAMING PLAN: PLEASE COMPLETE THE LEDGER MARK NEAR GRID 7.3 BETWEEN GRIDS C AND C.9. 6. SHEET S2.1 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); HIGH ROOF FRAMING PLANS A AND B: PLEASE REFERRENCE ON THE ROOF FRAMING PLAN THE LOCATION OF THE HIGH ROOF FRAMING PLANS. 7. SHEET S2.1; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: A DETAIL CUT ON THE PLAN AT GRID G AND BETWEEN GRIDS 8 AND 9 INDICATES S04 (SIMILAR). PLEASE REVISE THE DETAIL REFERENCE. 8. SHEET S2.1; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: A DETAIL CUT ON THE PLAN AT GRIDS G AND 5.7 INDICATES DETAIL 207. IS THIS CORRECT AT THAT LOCATION (THERE IS A BEAM BEARING FROM EACH SIDE)? PLEASE VERIFY. 9. SHEET S2.1; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: A DETAIL CUT ON THE PLAN AT GRIDS D AND 1 INDICATES DETAIL 207. IS THIS CORRECT AT THAT LOCATION? PLEASE VERIFY. 10. SHEET S2.1; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: A DETAIL CUT ON THE PLAN AT GRIDS A AND 5 INDICATES DETAIL 207. IS THIS CORRECT AT THAT LOCATION? PLEASE VERIFY. 11. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 03/25/2015 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Guadalajara Fiesta Grill - Storage Room and Trellis Additions T15CM01651 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 25, 2015 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. The building plans cannot be approved until the development package, DP13-0075, has been approved. 3. There is a canopy structure shown along the south side of the building on this plan that is not shown on the development package. 4. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 03/31/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 04/01/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. A restaurant is classified as assembly occupancy. If you wish to use Appendix A of the 2012 UPC to determine water pipe sizes, use the water fixture values of the water closets and urinals shown in the assembly column. Reference: Section 604.1, IPC 2012 and Appendix A, UPC 2012. 2. Finish labeling the water pipe sizes (e.g. in the vicinity of the restrooms). Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012 and Table 604.3, IPC 2012. 3. Clarify the reason for using an indirect waste connection for the soiled dish table sink (K15), the drop-in sinks (K20), and the under-bar hand sink (K58). The kitchen equipment schedule on sheet K2.1 calls for a direct waste connection for both K15 and K20; under the IPC, hand sinks are always installed with a direct connection. Reference: Section 802.1, IPC 2012. 4. Show the locations of the downspouts, the primary, and the secondary scuppers on the building elevations. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1108, IPC 2012. 5. The high roof areas appear to have scuppers that direct the rain water onto the main roof. Provide the size of these scuppers and show how secondary drainage is to be provided. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1108, IPC 2012. 6. Provide the size of the gas pipe that serves both WH-1 and AC-6 (272 CFH). Reference: Section 402.1, IFGC 2012. 7. Sheet P1.1 shows a radiant heater tagged as RH-4 but noted as RH-3; clarify. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 8. Show that the termination of the water heater vent terminates in accordance with Section 503.6.4 (2), IFGC 2012. |
| 04/02/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Revise the energy code analysis for the building envelope, coordinating the building components used in the analysis with those shown on the drawing (e.g. multiple roof types, doors, etc.). Reference: Section C303.1, IECC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 2. The NFRC certification numbers (CPD#) have not been included in this submittal. Factory-manufactured windows are required to have certificates attesting to their compliance to NFRC Standards 100 and 200 and can be provided by the manufacturer or found at www.nfrc.org. For site assembled commercial products, the NFRC component modeling approach program enables commercial window manufacturers to produce bid reports to prove energy performance prior to being awarded a job and provide finalized label certificates once the product has been installed. Fenestration performance reports based on AAMA 507 are based on energy simulations only (no actual testing) and are not acceptable. If the NFRC fenestration product ratings for the U-factor and the SHGC values are not available, use the appropriate default U-factor and SHGC values from Tables C303.1.3 (1), C303.1.3 (2) and C303.1.3.(3), IECC 2012 in the COMcheck analysis. Reference: Section C303.1.3, IECC 2012. 3. Clarify the discrepancy between the total supply air flow noted in the ventilation calculations (13,000 CFM) and the total supply air flow shown in the equipment schedule (17,800 CFM). 4. Clarify the discrepancy between the total exhaust air flow for the two restrooms noted in the ventilation calculations (70 CFM) and the total exhaust air flow shown in the mechanical plan (230 CFM). Ventilation for restrooms in public spaces requires a minimum of 50 CFM of mechanical exhaust per water closet or urinal if the exhaust is continuous and 70 CFM if the exhaust is intermittent. Reference: footnote e, Table 403.3, IMC 2012. |
| 04/06/2015 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please provide the following information. #1. Panel B not included with panel schedules. #2. Verify all new outdoor lighting is in compliance with sec.402.1 ( color temp ) Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code. |
| 04/07/2015 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP must be approved first. |