Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T15CM01500
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/01/2015 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/05/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide plans sealed by an Arizona Registrant, i.e. don't use an Illinois seal. Reference: Arizona Revised Statutes 32-125, Board of Technical Registration Rules R4-30-304. 2. If the water distribution calculations are based on the 2012 IPC, use the fixture units from Table E103.3 (2), IPC 2012. When determining the demand for fixtures not explicitly listed, use similar fixtures from the table (e.g. a public lavatory and a hand sink in a restaurant will have similar demands and usage rates). [Initial comment: Section 604.1, IPC 2012 allows water distribution systems to be designed using accepted engineering methods. Provide the source of the method used to determine the water demand and size the water distribution system. (If the UPC water fixture units haves been used, note that the water closets and urinals are for assembly use.)] 3. Clarify the basis of the hot water demand calculation. Table E103.3 (2), IPC 2012 provides fixture units for hot water demands based on 75% of the total fixture units for a given fixture but the hot water calculation does not consistently use these values. Using the hot water fixture units from Table E103.3 (2), IPC 2012 yields a total of 18 fixture units for a hot water demand of 18.8 GPM (Table E103.3 (3)). Further reduction of this demand by 25% does not appear to be justified. [Initial comment: Verify that the two tankless water heaters are capable of providing the required hot water demand. Using three-quarters of the total fixture units shown on sheet P4.1 for the fixtures that require hot water, the hot water demand appears to be about 16 GPM or 60% more hot water than the two water heaters are capable of producing at 140 degrees Fahrenheit. Reference: Section 607.1, IPC 2012.] 4. Clarify how the vent for the 4" floor drain in the corral area is able to rise to 6" above the flood rim of the floor drain prior to running horizontally. [Initial comment: Verify that all of the vents (except for vents serving interceptors located outdoors) rise vertically to at least 6" above the flood rims of the fixtures they protect prior to running horizontally. Reference: Section 905.4, IPC 2012.] |
| 05/05/2015 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/06/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Provide NFRC fenestration product ratings for the U-factor and the SHGC values on COMcheck or use the appropriate default U-factor and SHGC values from Tables C303.1.3 (1), C303.1.3 (2) and C303.1.3.(3), IECC 2012. The NFRC certification numbers (CPD#) have not been included in this submittal. Factory-manufactured windows are required to have certificates attesting to their compliance to NFRC Standards 100 and 200 and can be provided by the manufacturer or found at www.nfrc.org. For site assembled commercial products, the NFRC component modeling approach program enables commercial window manufacturers to produce bid reports to prove energy performance prior to being awarded a job and provide finalized label certificates once the product has been installed. Fenestration performance reports based on AAMA 507 are based on energy simulations only (no actual testing) and are not acceptable. Reference: Section C303.1.3, IECC 2012.] 2. The operating weights for the rooftop units have not been adjusted on the structural drawings that were included in this submittal. [Initial comment: The scheduled weights of the rooftop units RTU-1 and RRTU-2 are greater than the weights noted on the roof framing plan. Verify that the installation of the two new rooftop units will not adversely affect the structural integrity of the roof. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2012.] 3. The ventilation calculations appear to be a blending of the ventilation calculations from the 2006 IMC and the calculations from the 2012 IMC. The result is that the minimum ventilation requirements have been over-stated. Calculate the minimum ventilation requirements per Section 403.3, IMC 2012 and show how the ventilation rate can be reduced to the minimum required ventilation. Reference: Section C403.2.5, IECC 2012. [Initial comment: Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation using the current code. Reference: Section 403.2, IMC 2012.] |
| 05/11/2015 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Raising Cane's T15CM01500 Building Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 11, 2015 1) The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2) Zoning will approve the building plans once all other PDSD review agencies have approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |