Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T15CM01500
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/10/2015 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/12/2015 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET A1.0; CODE COMPLIANCE: PLEASE REVISE THE ACCESSIBILITY CODE TO THE 2009 ICC/ANSI A117.1. 2. SHEET A1.0; CODE INFORMATION: PLEASE PROVIDE A PLUMBING FIXTURE ANALYSIS ON THE DRAWINGS INDICATING THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF WATER CLOSETS, LAVATORIES, AND SERVICE SINK PER THE IBC TABLE 2902.1. 3. SHEET A1.1 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A4.2 (ELEVATION 2): THE ELEVATION TITLE SHOULD BE WEST ELEVATION. PLEASE REVISE. 4. SHEET A1.1 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A4.1 (ELEVATION 2): THE ELEVATION TITLE SHOULD BE EAST ELEVATION. PLEASE REVISE. 5. SHEET A1.1; FLOOR PLAN: AT THE DRIVE THROUGH (PAY) AREA, A SECTION 1/A7.5 IS CUT. SHEET A7.5 IS NOT INCLUDED IN THIS SUBMITTAL SET. PLEASE VERIFY. 6. SHEET A1.3; FLOOR PLAN: ON THIS SHEET, PROVIDE A CALCULATION INDICATING THE NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE DINING SURFACES REQUIRED PER THE IBC SECTION 1108.2.9.1. 7. SHEET A4.1; KEY NOTES: NOTE 2 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE ELEVATIONS. PLEASE VERIFY. 8. SHEET A4.2; KEY NOTES: NOTES 2 AND 18 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE ELEVATIONS. PLEASE VERIFY. 9. SHEET A5.2; SECTION 5: PROVIDE A DIMENSION ON THE SECTION FOR THE SERVICE COUNTER HEIGHT. 10. SHEET A5.3; PLAN 1: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE THE ELEVATION INDICATORS. 11. SHEET A6.1 (SECTION 1); SHEET A10.2 (DETAIL 6): IS DETAIL 6/A10.2 SHOWN IN THE CORRECT LOCATION ON THE SECTION 1? PLEASE VERIFY. 12. SHEET A8.3; DETAIL 11: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE THE VERBIAGE. 13. SHEET A10.1; KEY NOTES: IN NOTES 2 AND 3, PLEASE ADD VERBIAGE THAT DETAILS 3 AND 4 ARE ON SHEET A10.2. 14. SHEET A10.1; KEY NOTE 6: REFERENCE IS MADE TO DETAIL 6/A10.2 FOR THE SCREEN WALL. PLEASE REVISE THE REFERENCE. 15. SHEETS A11.1, A11.2, AND A11.3: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE THE VERBIAGE. 16. SHEET S1.2 (COLUMN SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET S16): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE COLUMN C-2 IS A HSS4X4X1/4, WHILE THE COLUMN SCHEDULE INDICATES A HSS4X4X3/16 (C1). PLEASE CLARIFY. 17. SHEET S1.2 (FOOTING SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET F-4): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE FOOTINGS F4 AND F5 SHALL BE MINIMUM 2'-6" X 2'-6", WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES A 2'-0" X 2'-4" (F4) OR A 2'-0" X 3'-2" (F5). PLEASE VERIFY. 18. SHEET S1.2; FOUNDATION PLAN: BETWEEN GRIDS H AND F ON GRID 2, A SECTION CUT REFERENCES B/SK-03. PLEASE REVISE THAT REFERENCE (ADD SECTION TO THE SUBMITTAL DRAWINGS.). 19. SHEET S1.2; FOUNDATION PLAN: AT GRIDS 2 AND F, A SECTION CUT REFERENCES 17/SD1. THERE IS NO STEEL COLUMN AT THIS LOCATION. PLEASE VERIFY. 20. SHEET SD1; DETAILS 7 AND 8: SHOULD THE VERTICAL REINFORCING DOWELS IN THE FOUNDATION BE INDICATED AT THE MASONRY WALLS? PLEASE VERIFY. 21. SHEET SD4; DETAIL 9: PLEASE INDICATE ON THE DETAIL THE MAXIMUM ALLOWAGLE LIGHT POLE HEIGHT IS 25'. 22. GENERAL; SPECIAL INSPECTIONS: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES SPECIAL INSPECTIONS TO BE PERFORMED BY INDIVIDUALS CERTIFIED FOR THOSE SPECIFIC INSPECTIONS BY THE INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL PER THE IBC SECTION 1704. THE INSPECTORS LISTED FOR THE WELDING, STEEL CONSTRUCTION, AND MASONRY ARE NOT ON THE ICC CERTIFIED LIST. PLEASE RESUBMIT. 23. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 03/16/2015 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 03/19/2015 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | #1. Please provide compliance with the Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code. Include color temperture compliance for lamps and fixtures, section 402.1 . #2. All 115V kitchen receptacles require GFI protection per 210.8 B, NEC. |
| 03/20/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Section 604.1, IPC 2012 allows water distribution systems to be designed using accepted engineering methods. Provide the source of the method used to determine the water demand and size the water distribution system. (If the UPC water fixture units haves been used, note that the water closets and urinals are for assembly use.) 2. Verify that the two tankless water heaters are capable of providing the required hot water demand. Using three-quarters of the total fixture units shown on sheet P4.1 for the fixtures that require hot water, the hot water demand appears to be about 16 GPM or 60% more hot water than the two water heaters are capable of producing at 140 degrees Fahrenheit. Reference: Section 607.1, IPC 2012. 3. The specified backflow prevention device, Watts model 7, is not listed for ASSE 1022 as required for coffee machines or non-carbonated beverage dispensers. Reference: Section 608.16.10, IPC 2012. 4. Provide separate indirect waste pipes for each compartment of the 3-compartment sink to protect against cross-contamination or fouling. Reference: Sections 801.2 and 802.1.8, IPC 2012. 5. Verify that all of the vents (except for vents serving interceptors located outdoors) rise vertically to at least 6" above the flood rims of the fixtures they protect prior to running horizontally. Reference: Section 905.4, IPC 2012. 6. Clarify the apparent discrepancy between detail 10/P3.1 which shows a hot water supply temperature of 140 degrees Fahrenheit and the specification for the thermostatic mixing valve (which is shown located at the source of the hot water) which indicates that a 110-degree Fahrenheit hot water supply will be delivered to all hot water outlets. 7. Provide tempered water for the restroom lavatories using approved devices conforming to ASSE 1070. (Note that the specified mixing valve is not listed to ASSE 1070) Reference: Sections 416.5 and 607.1.2, IPC 2012. 8. Clarify the connected natural gas load. The stated total load in detail 2/P2.1 is 2154 CFH but the total of the individual loads appears to be 1353 CFH, a difference of 801 CFH. (Note that the controlling code is the 2012 IFGC, not the 2009 IFGC.) 9. Coordinate the natural gas load information on detail 2/P2.1 with the equipment data for A02-D and A03-D on sheet FS2. |
| 03/20/2015 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/20/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 03/25/2015 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Raising Cane's T15CM01500 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 25, 2015 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. The building plans cannot be approved until the development package, DP15-0006, has been approved. 3. The development package sheets in this building plan are not the approved plans. Once the development plan is approved either provide the approved sheets in the building plan set or mark the development package sheets as reference only or remove the development package sheet from the building plan set. 4. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 04/06/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Tucson. Reference: Sections C103.2 and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. 2. Provide NFRC fenestration product ratings for the U-factor and the SHGC values on COMcheck or use the appropriate default U-factor and SHGC values from Tables C303.1.3 (1), C303.1.3 (2) and C303.1.3.(3), IECC 2012. The NFRC certification numbers (CPD#) have not been included in this submittal. Factory-manufactured windows are required to have certificates attesting to their compliance to NFRC Standards 100 and 200 and can be provided by the manufacturer or found at www.nfrc.org. For site assembled commercial products, the NFRC component modeling approach program enables commercial window manufacturers to produce bid reports to prove energy performance prior to being awarded a job and provide finalized label certificates once the product has been installed. Fenestration performance reports based on AAMA 507 are based on energy simulations only (no actual testing) and are not acceptable. Reference: Section C303.1.3, IECC 2012. 3. The scheduled weights of the rooftop units RTU-1 and RRTU-2 are greater than the weights noted on the roof framing plan. Verify that the installation of the two new rooftop units will not adversely affect the structural integrity of the roof. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2012. 4. Re-label the rooftop AC units on sheet M1.1: they are both called out as being RTU-2. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 5. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation using the current code. Reference: Section 403.2, IMC 2012. 6. Clarify the specifications for the exhaust fans. EF-1 appears to exhaust the restrooms and the storage room; EF-2 appears to be serving the Type I hood but is labeled as EF-1 on sheet M4.6. The only fan that is scheduled on sheet M2.1 is F-1. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 7. Evaporative cooling systems that do not include water recycling or reuse systems are prohibited by the Arizona Revised Statues, ARS 45-313. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/09/2015 | KROBLES1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |