Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T15CM01362
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/29/2015 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/05/2015 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. A soils report is not included with this submittal package. 2. A site plan was not included with this submittal package. 3. The following sheets have lettering size below the City of Tucson standards of 3/32" actual including upper and lower case: T1, A1.1, A6, A7.1, E2.1, E3.0. 4. Please provide certification for special inspectors. END OF REVIEW |
| 05/05/2015 | RONALD BROWN | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Completed | |
| 05/05/2015 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Family Dollar T15CM01362 Building Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 5, 2015 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. The building plans appear to meet the proposed development package but Zoning cannot approve until the development package, DP14-0192, has been approved. 3. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 05/08/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide documentation of the roof and walls to justify the U-factors used in the COMcheck analysis; see footnote (b) of the COMcheck assembly section. [Initial comment: Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Tucson. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope (e.g. revise the insulation note as required to agree with the insulation shown in the energy analysis, show the U-factor and SHGF for fenestration, etc.). Reference: Sections C103.2 and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.] 2. Provide documentation of the U-factor and solar heat gain coefficient values used for the fenestration components (e.g. commercial window manufacturer's NFRC bid reports for site-built storefronts, NFRC certification for the insulated doors, etc.). See footnote (c) of the COMcheck assembly section. [Initial comment: Provide NFRC fenestration product ratings for the U-factor and the SHGC values on COMcheck or use the appropriate default U-factor and SHGC values from Tables C303.1.3 (1), C303.1.3 (2) and C303.1.3.(3), IECC 2012. Reference: Section C303.1.3, IECC 2012. (Note: For site assembled commercial products, the NFRC component modeling approach program enables commercial window manufacturers to produce bid reports to prove energy performance prior to being awarded a job and provide finalized label certificates once the product has been installed. Fenestration performance reports based on AAMA 507 are based on energy simulations only (no actual testing) and are not acceptable.)] Show that the proposed HVAC system meets the control requirements of Section C403.2.4: set-point overlap restriction, automatic set-back and shut-down controls, automatic start capabilities, and shutoff damper controls. Reference: Section C303.1, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. [Initial comment: Show that the proposed HVAC system meets the minimum efficiency, operational, and control requirements of Sections C403.2, C403.3 and, if neither the efficient lighting system nor the on-site renewable energy options are selected, C406.2, IECC 2012 (e.g. provide the mechanical energy code compliance certification from COMcheck). Reference: Section C303.1, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.] |
| 05/08/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide the slope of the rain gutters; a slope of ΒΌ" vertical in 12" horizontal would be required for a 6" x 6" gutter to accommodate a total roof area of 9,065 square feet with four downspouts (2,266 SF/ downspout). Reference: Table 1106.6, IPC 2012. [Initial comment: Provide roof drainage and gutter size calculations based on the 100-year hourly rainfall rate for Tucson, 3" per hour. Reference: Sections 1106.1 and, 1106.6, IPC 2012.] |
| 05/12/2015 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/20/2015 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |