Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T15CM00518
Parcel: 11515092A

Address:
2051 N 13TH AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI

Permit Number - T15CM00518
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/11/2015 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
02/19/2015 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change GENERAL
1. Provide a site plan with submittal package.
2. Several sheets have lettering below the COT acceptable standard of 3/32" minimum actual size for both upper and lower case. Please revise all non-compliant sheets and resubmit.
3. Please provide structural calculations for the following:
a. For all new masonry partitions and their new foundations
b. All new roof top mounted HVAC equipment
4. Please provide certification for special inspectors.
SHEET A-2
5. Wouldn't it be prudent to show the concrete floor to be demolished for the new masonry partitioning and foundation installation?
SHEET A-3
6. All controlled/secured exit doors are to be activated by the fire alarm system. Please reference fire reviewer comments.
7. Provide a large scale detail of the ramp/landing/stair configuration located at the South west entry of the building showing all accessible requirements such as landings, ramps, stairs, all types of guard and handrails, elevation changes, slope percentages, dimensions, ramp runs and elevation differences.
SHEET A-3.5
8. The drawing has a plumbing fixture layer shift. Reference the toilets and the water heater.
ADDITIONAL COMMENT
9. Need hazardous chemical analysis for storage of oil, ATF and anti-freeze as per 2012 IBC, Section 307 and Tables 307.1(1) and 307.1(2).
END OF REVIEW
02/26/2015 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Completed
02/27/2015 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Verify that the pipe sizes called out for the flush valves will not result in water velocities greater than that recommended by the pipe manufacturer (e.g. limit the water velocity to less than 8 FPS for copper, PEX, or CPVC piping). At a minimum design flow rate of 25 GPM for a siphonic, flush-valve water closet, a 1" Type L copper pipe has a flow velocity of 9.7 FPS. Reference: Table 604.3, IPC 2012.
2. Verify that the 1" CW drop into room 106 serving two urinals and two lavatories (14 flush-valve fixture units; 30 GPM) is adequate based on the water pressure calculations and the water velocity. Reference: Section 604.1 and Table 604.3, IPC 2012.
3. Verify the size of the natural gas pipe located between AC-4 and UH-4. Per Table 402.4 (2), 125 CFH at 250-feet of developed length requires a 1-1/4" pipe. Reference: Section 402.4, IFGC 2012.
4. Water supply connections to beverage dispensers shall be protected with backflow preventers conforming to ASSE 1022. Reference: Section 608.16.1, IPC 2012.
5. Clarify the specifications for the two urinals. They have the same model number but P-3A is noted as having siphon jet flushing while P-3 has washout flushing; P-3A is called both "washbrook" and "allbrook" (two different model names). Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
02/27/2015 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project (AC units 1 through 6). Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012.
2. Replot detail 11/M4 so that it is legible. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
3. Revise the symbol for supply diffuser G-4 in room 123; it is shown as an exhaust grille. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
4. Show that the dimensions and construction of the proposed roof access ladder comply with Section 306.5, IMC 2012.
5. Clarify the sequence of operation for EF-4. The gas detection note on sheet M5 implies that it is to be controlled by the gas detection panel but the equipment specification calls for it to have continuous operation.
6. Sheet A-3 notes that the combined area of the truck bay and service area is 4439 square feet; at 0.75 CFM per square foot, the total exhaust rate should be at least 3330 CFM. The combined exhaust flow rate for EF-3 and EF-4 is only 3250 CFM. Reference: Section 404.2, IMC 2012.
7. Clarify the exhaust flow rate for EF-1. The equipment specification calls for 1500 CFM but a total of only 1200 CFM is shown on the mechanical floor plan. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
03/04/2015 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Loomis Armored, USA
T14CM00518
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 4, 2015

1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. The building plans appear to meet the proposed development package but Zoning cannot approve until a development package has been approved.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956
03/05/2015 DAN SANTA CRUZ ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change #1. Please provide a complete single line diagram including disconnects, conduits, feeder sizes and types, from SES equipment to all panels. Water, Gas, Bld. Steel Bonding.

#2. Feeder size for T1 primary does not coincide with OCPD in service switchboard 'HA'.
#3. Please provide 2012 IECC light budget calc's, compliance.

#4. Please show full compliance with the Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code.

#5. Please verify voltage indicated on panel schedule for LA.

#6. Key note #7 on plan sheet E-1 refers to plan sheet A-1.1, there is no A-1.1, please clarify.

#7. Key note #6 on plan sheet E1.1, calls out for new switchboard to be rated 65k AIC. This conflicts with the single line diagram on plan sheet E-6, and panel schedules.
Please provide a complete fault current analysis.
#8. Truck service area to comply with NEC art.511.
Reference: IBC sec.107.2.1 NEC art.110.3, 408.4, City of Tucson Plan Submittal Requirements.
03/11/2015 ELIZABETH LEIBOLD ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change Dev Pkg needs to be approved, prior to Engineering approval of bldg plans.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
03/17/2015 SHANAE POWELL OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
03/17/2015 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed