Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Permit Number - T15CM00420
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/11/2015 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Corrections and additional information as requested per last plan review comments not addressed. |
| 09/17/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Comment not resolved. Describing a fixture does not mean copying the general attributes of fixtures from the code book. A typical description would be: "Two-piece, tank-type, pressure-assist, high efficiency water closet with elongated bowl; 1.1 GPF, 12" rough-in, right-hand trip lever, and with open-front seat, less lid. Crane model 31885 or approved equivalent" [Comment not addressed.] [Second comment: Comment not addressed; requiring all fixtures to be "per the 2012 IPC" is not a fixture description.] [Initial comment: Provide fixture descriptions for all plumbing fixtures. Reference: Section 402, IPC 2012 and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] 2. Comment not resolved. The calculation of the allowable friction per 100-feet is not to be made using random numbers. Your calculations showed 3 PSI available for friction with an equivalent length of 180-feet which will result in an allowable friction value of 1.67 PSI per 100 feet. [Comment not addressed.] [Second comment: Comment not addressed.] [Initial comment: Verify the pressure drop at the water meter, the water pressure range, and the static lift for the water supply. Correct the arithmetic used to calculate the pressure available for friction.] 3. Comment not resolved. The riser diagram needs to show the fixtures and pipes in the same relative positions as the plumbing plan and with the same pipe sizes. [The waste and vent riser diagram is still not coordinated with the plans. In addition, the fixture drain from the clothes washer shall connect to a fixture branch that is at least 3" in size per Section 406.2, IPC 2012; a 3" cleanout will also be required.] [Second comment: Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Coordinate the waste and vent riser diagram with the plumbing floor plan. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] |
| 09/17/2015 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. PREVIOUS COMMENT 2; SHEET A1: FOR THE BOTTLE-LESS WATER COOLER, REVISE THE FLOOR SPACE IN FRONT OF THE WATER COOLER TO 30"X48" CLEAR PER THE ICC/ANSI A117.1 SECTION 305.3. 2. PREVIOUS COMMENT 8; SHEET A5: THE NORTH ELEVATION ON SHEET A5 STILL INDICATES FOUR WINDOWS, WHILE THE PLAN ON A1 STILL INDICATES THREE. PLEASE REVISE. 3. SHEET A3; FOUNDATION PLAN: THE LANDING AT THE STAIR DOES NOT MATCH SHEET A1. PLEASE COORDINATE. 4. SHEET A3; BRACED WALL SCHEDULE: THE FIRST NOTE INDICATES TO SEE SHEET A1 FOR THE LOCATION OF BRACED WALLS. REVISE THAT SHEET REFERENCE TO A3. 5. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 09/17/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Revise the envelope descriptions (i.e. R-values) in the envelope compliance certificate to agree with the construction shown on the plans. Verify that 1" of foam board is rated at R-10. Note that the mechanical compliance certificate is not needed since the existing equipment is being used. [Comment not addressed. Note that only the addition must comply with the envelope requirements of the 2012 IECC.] [Second comment: No COMcheck analysis was found in this submittal. The "model energy code" approach shown on sheet A2 has not been used since 2003.] [Initial comment: Demonstrate energy code compliance for the addition to the building envelope using calculations based on the current code (i.e. provide a COMcheck analysis of the envelope addition). Reference: Sections C101.4.3, C101.5, and C103.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. 2. The default U-value for the metal insulated door was not used. [Comment not addressed.] [Second comment: Comment not addressed.] [Initial comment: Provide NFRC fenestration product ratings for the U-factor and the SHGC values for the doors and windows on COMcheck or use the appropriate default U-factor and SHGC values from Tables C303.1.3 (1), C303.1.3 (2) and C303.1.3.(3), IECC 2012. Factory-manufactured windows are required to have certificates attesting to their compliance to NFRC Standards 100 and 200 and can be provided by the manufacturer or found at www.nfrc.org. Reference: Section C303.1.3, IECC 2012.] 3. No notes were found on the drawings regarding the operation of the exhaust fan. [Comment not addressed.] [Second comment: Comment not resolved. Provide a sequence of operation that will result in all of the air supplied to the restroom being exhausted during occupied hours.] [Initial comment: No exhaust fan is shown in the restroom; provide the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust fan to show that all of the air supplied to the restroom will be exhausted during occupied hours. Reference: Section 403.2.1 (4), IMC 2012.] |