Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Permit Number - T15CM00420
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/05/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The 2006 IPC is no longer current. [Initial comment: The International Plumbing Code, 2012, is the controlling code for this structure, not the International Residential Code (changing "IRC" to "IBC" in the notes does not correct the issue). Reference: Section 101.2, IPC 2012.] 2. Clarify the size of the backflow preventer; the size is noted as being 2", 1-1/4", ¾", and ½". [Initial comment: Show the location of the reduced pressure backflow assembly on the drawings; indicate the size of the assembly. Reference: Chapter XXVII, Article V, Section 27-72, the Tucson Code, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf] 3. With an occupant load greater than 15, a drinking fountain (hi-low or a point-of-use water dispenser) and a service sink are required. [Initial comment: Provide the minimum plumbing facilities required by Table 2902.1 and Section 2902.2, IBC 2012, for business occupancy.] 4. Comment not addressed; requiring all fixtures to be "per the 2012 IPC" is not a fixture description. [Initial comment: Provide fixture descriptions for all plumbing fixtures. Reference: Section 402, IPC 2012 and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] 5. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Section 604.1, IPC 2012 allows water distribution systems to be designed using accepted engineering methods. Provide the source of the method used to determine the water demand and size the water distribution system.] 6. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Verify the pressure drop at the water meter, the water pressure range, and the static lift for the water supply. Correct the arithmetic used to calculate the pressure available for friction.] 7. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Coordinate the waste and vent riser diagram with the plumbing floor plan. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] |
| 06/05/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The note, "All mechanical, duct material, size and layout shall comply with Section 106.3.1, 2012 IMC" makes no sense. Read Section 106.3.1, IMC 2012. [Initial comment: Clarify the meaning of the note on sheet A6 that states, "All mechanical, duct material, size and layout shall comply with Chapters 12 - 24 of 2012 IBC." Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] 2. N1104.1, shown on sheet A6, is a section in the IRC. [Initial comment: Remove all notes that refer to the IRC (e.g. Section R303.3, IRC 2012 is not applicable; the International Mechanical Code is the controlling code.)] 3. No COMcheck analysis was found in this submittal. The "model energy code" approach shown on sheet A2 has not been used since 2003. [Initial comment: Demonstrate energy code compliance for the addition to the building envelope using calculations based on the current code (i.e. provide a COMcheck analysis of the envelope addition). Reference: Sections C101.4.3, C101.5, and C103.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. 4. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Provide NFRC fenestration product ratings for the U-factor and the SHGC values for the doors and windows on COMcheck or use the appropriate default U-factor and SHGC values from Tables C303.1.3 (1), C303.1.3 (2) and C303.1.3.(3), IECC 2012. Factory-manufactured windows are required to have certificates attesting to their compliance to NFRC Standards 100 and 200 and can be provided by the manufacturer or found at www.nfrc.org. Reference: Section C303.1.3, IECC 2012.] 5. Comment not resolved. Provide calculations to show that operable windows or doors will provide a minimum of 4% of the room area. [Initial comment: Provide calculations to show how ventilation will be provided for the occupied spaces. Reference: Section 401.2, IMC 2012.] 6. Comment not resolved. Provide a sequence of operation that will result in all of the air supplied to the restroom being exhausted during occupied hours. [Initial comment: No exhaust fan is shown in the restroom; provide the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust fan to show that all of the air supplied to the restroom will be exhausted during occupied hours. Reference: Section 403.2.1 (4), IMC 2012.] 7. Comment not resolved; undercutting the doors still results in the corridor being used as a duct. [Initial comment: Revise the mechanical design as required to avoid using the corridor as a return air duct. Reference: Section 601.2, IMC 2012.] |
| 06/05/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The water meter size is noted as being 5/8" (with a serial number), ¾", and 1". [Initial comment: Verify the size of the existing water meter and provide its serial number. Verify the size (and existence) of the backflow preventer. The plumbing plan indicates that there is a 1" water meter with a 2" reduced pressure backflow preventer but the site plan calls out an existing ¾" meter with no backflow preventer.] |
| 06/09/2015 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | While the electrical review for the current submittal is approved, due to the potential modifications necessary to address comments associated with the reviews of other disciplines the electrical workflow is denoted as denied in order to verify that those modifications will not adversely impact the electrical review. |
| 06/15/2015 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 529 N. 6ht Avenue T15CM00420 Building Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: Junw 15, 2015 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning has reviewed the building plans and they appear to match the proposed development package. Zoning cannot approve the building plans until development package, DP15-0010, has been approved. 3. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 06/22/2015 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Needs Review |