Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T15CM00155
Parcel: 12710017D

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI

Permit Number - T15CM00155
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/23/2015 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Reqs Change Several sheets refer to E. Wilmot Rd., should be N. Wilmot.
Please provide commentary regarding HazMat Rm. 125 and what will be stored within.
Per section 1018 of the 2012 International Fire Code, corridors serving an occupant load greater than 30 are required to be 1 hour rated. Please revise plans to reflect rated doors, ceilings, walls.
01/27/2015 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change SHEET T1.0
1. Code Review
a. Provide square footage break down analysis
b. Provide occupancy load break down analysis
SHEET A1.0
2. Insure accessible door clearance as per 2009 ICC A117.1, Section 404.2.3.2 (b) for door number 128.
3. At the new ramp:
a. Provide a large scale detail showing all accessible requirements such as dimensions, handrails on both sides of the ramp, slope, run dimension, elevation difference and landings.
b. Provide a large scale handrail elevation.
4. Provide a 1 hour fire rating enclosure for the hazmat room as required by the 2012 IBC for hazardous gases.
5. The demising partition between the absorbed office space and the adjacent tenant is required to be a two hour rated partition. Wall section 2 is not a rated partition.
a. Provide a wall section showing the all the componants of a 2 hour fire rated assembly and provide a testing lab fire rated assembly number.
6. Insure the lavatory in the breakroom is 2'-10" a.f.f.
END OF REVIEW
01/28/2015 RONALD BROWN COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Passed
01/29/2015 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Marana Health Care - 899 N. Wilmot Road
T14CM00155
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 29, 2015

1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. The building plans appear to meet the proposed development package but Zoning cannot approve until a development package has been approved.

3. The address shown in the title block is not correct, 899 E Wilmot, this should be 899 N Wilmot.

4. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956
02/03/2015 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved ENG will stamp the building plan approved upon approval of the DP Package.
02/04/2015 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Needs Review 1. Clarify how the secondary scupper (overflow) will be constructed. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
2. If the water heater shelf is new, provide a design for the mounting shelf for the water heater along with structural calculations to show that the water heater is safely supported. Reference: Section 301.2, IPC 2012.
3. Clarify the proposed hot water recirculation system and coordinate it with detail 1/P2. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
4. Riser diagram 3/P2 shows a floor drain located in room 113 that doesn't show up on the plumbing plan (P1): coordinate the two drawings. Reference: Section 301.2, IPC 2012.
02/05/2015 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Provide a listing of the materials that will be located in the HAZMAT room; include the quantities of the materials and how they are packaged. Clarify the construction of the room and provide for any exhaust requirements. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
2. If the exhaust fans are new, provide the air balancing data and electrical requirements for the fans. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
3. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the addition to the building envelope; use the climate zone for Tucson. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the additions to the building envelope. Reference: Sections C101.4.3, C101.5, and C103.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.
4. Show that the relocated window complies with the requirements of the current code. Provide NFRC fenestration product ratings for the U-factor and the SHGC values on COMcheck or use the appropriate default U-factor and SHGC values from Tables C303.1.3 (1), C303.1.3 (2) and C303.1.3.(3), IECC 2012. Reference: Section C303.1.3, IECC 2012.
5. It is not clear if the three heat pumps noted in the schedule on M-2 are new or are being reused. If they are new, provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project and show that the proposed heat pumps meet the requirements of Sections C403.2.2, C403.2.3, C403.2, and C403.3 (e.g. provide the mechanical energy code compliance certification from COMcheck). Reference: Section C303.1, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.
6. If the three heat pumps noted in the schedule on M-2 are new, show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drains. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2012 as amended by the City of Tucson.
7. Provide calculations to show how ventilation will be provided for the occupied spaces. Reference: Section 401.2, IMC 2012.
8. Provide an air balancing report prior to the final mechanical inspection to verify that the HVAC systems are capable of supplying and exhausting at least the minimum air flow rates called for in the design drawings. The balancing shall be performed in accordance with the procedural standards of either the National Environmental Balancing Bureau (NEBB) or the Associated Air Balance Council (AABC). Reference: Section 403.7, IMC 2012.
9. The drawings indicate that a return air plenum is being utilized. Verify that the materials installed in the plenum conform to Section 602.2.1, IMC 2012.
10. Provide smoke detectors in the return air duct, for all air distribution systems sharing the return air plenum with a total design return air capacity greater than 2,000 CFM. Reference: Section 606.2.1, IMC 2012.
11. Smoke detectors shall be located upstream of any outside air connections. Reference: Sections 606.2.1 and 606.2.2, IMC 2012.
12. Show the location of the visible and audible signals for the duct smoke detectors. Reference: Section 606.4.1, IMC 2012.
02/05/2015 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Completed
02/11/2015 DAN SANTA CRUZ ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Please provide additional information for a complete plan review as per , IBC 107.2.1, NEC 110.1, .2, and .3. City of Tucson Plan Check Submittal Requirements.

#1. Plan Sheet E-2.
(a) A complete single line diagram of the service with all associated equipment.
(b) Show voltage and phase, all grounding and bonding in detail.
(c) Panel and all feeder sizes, types.
(d) Fuses, circuit breaker sizes, rating, AIC.
(e) A complete fault current analysis.
(f) Breaker panels not consistent on plan sheets.

#2. Plan Sheet E-3.
(a) New panels A and B not shown.

#3. Plan Sheet E-4.
(a) Light fixture types, circuit designations, emergency or night light information not provided.
(b) Provide complete light fixture schedules.

#4. The Other Plan Sheet E-4. ( Schedules )
(a) Provide complete panel schedules, load calc's each phase for all panels.

#5. Provide 2012 IECC Compliance .

#6 Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code compliance if applicable.

#7. Please be advised, due to numerous deficiencies associated with the plans per this review, additional corrections may be generated at subsequent review.