Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T14OT01231
Parcel: 12618111B

Address:
3901 E 22ND ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: FLOODPLAIN

Permit Number - T14OT01231
Review Name: FLOODPLAIN
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/14/2014 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: October 14, 2014
DUE DATE: October 24, 2014
SUBJECT: McDonald's USA, LLC Development Plan Package- Engineering Review
TO: Wood/Patel, Attn: Stefanie Thrush, PE
LOCATION: 3901 E 22nd St; T14S R14E Sec15
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP14-0176

SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package and Drainage Report (Wood/Patel, 25SEP14). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administration Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Refer to the links for further clarification:
http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

The following items need to be addressed:

SITE PLAN:

1) AM Sec.2-06.4.2.B: Revise the development plan package to include a brief legal description of the subject property within the Title Block.

2) AM Sec.2-06.4.2.E: Revise the development plan package to provide the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e sheet 1 of 14, 2 of 14 etc.). The total number of sheets needs to include the SWPPP plans.

3) AM Sec.2-06.4.3: Revise the development plan package to provide the administrative street address adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

4) AM Sec.2-06.4.3: The relevant Development Plan Package case number (DP14-0176) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets

5) AM Sec.2-06.4.4: Revise the development plan package to show the project location map in the upper right hand corner of the cover sheet.

6) AM.Sec.2-06.4.7: Revise the development plan package and General Note #17 to correctly reference the Technical Standard Manual Section, TSM Sec.7-01. The Development Standard reference no longer applies and the note should provide a reference to the TSM which is now the effective code reference.

7) AM.Sec.2-06.4.7: Revise the development plan package to remove General Note #20, or revise it to read more specifically. The approved development plan package is the only document that acts as the grading plan and site plan. There will not be another Tentative Plat or Development Plan so this part of the note does not apply.

8) AM.Sec.2-06.4.7.A.3: Revise the development plan package to provide the rezoning case number in the lower right corner of each sheet adjacent to the title block. List the rezoning conditions on the plan.

9) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.A.6: Revise the development plan package to provide a general note stating "This project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria UDC Article.5.4, Major Streets and Routes Setback Zone and UDC Article.5.5 Gateway Corridor Zone (GCZ)."

10) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.B: Revise the development plan package and all note references to the FEMA Flood Zone Designation to correctly state the following; "FEMA Flood Zone Designation: Zone X & AH per FEMA FIRM Panel 04019C2283L effective date 06/16/2011."

11) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.B.2.a: Revise the development plan package to include a general note to state; "This project is affected by the City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations."

12) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.B.2.b: Revise the development plan package to include a general note to state; "A floodplain use permit and finished floor elevation certificate are required."

13) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.C.2: Revise the development plan package and General Note #6 to read per the referenced section; "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual."

14) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.A: Revise the development plan package to include the perimeter information to include bearing in degrees, minutes and seconds together with distance in feet or other functional reference system for the property boundary. Refer to Zoning comments for the required Lot combination.

15) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.B: Revise the development plan package to provide the recordation information for any existing easements onsite. If an easement is to be abandoned provide the recordation information on the plan. Per the site plan sheet there is a 6-foot telephone easement that is existing under the proposed building footprint, this easement must be vacated prior to the approval of the development plan package.

16) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.C: Revise the development plan package to dimension the existing width of curbs, curb cuts, curb to property line and sidewalks within the public right-of-ways. Label all streets as "Public" and Alvernon Way and 22nd Street as "MS&R."

17) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.D: Revise the development plan package to label the existing electric pole in plan view that is located within the right-of-way of Wilmot Road.

18) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.E: Revise the development plan package and the Benchmark Section to either provide the datum referenced used (i.e. NGVD29 or NAVD88) or provide the City of Tucson field book number and page if using the stated "City of Tucson Datum."

19) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.F: Revise the development plan package to label all existing storm drainage facilities adjacent to the site with the Improvement Plan Number in plan view.

20) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.I: Revise the development plan package to include the calculated water surface elevation for the existing FEMA SFHA Zone AH per the Drainage Report. The water surface elevation should be calculated at the upstream end of the proposed structure and it must be shown in plan view. Per AM Sec.2-06.4.8.I.2 the linear distance between water surface elevations should not exceed 200 feet.

21) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development plan package to clearly label all existing or proposed improvements within the right-of-way. Provide the existing dimension of the sidewalk and curbing for all 3 streets adjacent to the site. Label any existing bus stops on the plan with dimensions and a Keynote.

22) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development plan package to label the required minimum 25-foot radii at all driveway entrances along both sides per TSM Sec.10-01.3.2.C and Figure 6.

23) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Prior approval from TDOT will be required for all proposed work within the right of way of the adjacent streets. There are multiple areas where work is being proposed (rock rip rap splash pads, landscape areas, etc.) within the existing right-of-way, verify if TDOT will require a maintenance easement, temporary construction easement or a Temporary Revocable Easement for said work. A right-of-way use permit will be required.

24) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.2: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension the future SVTs for the driveway entrances, refer to TSM Sec.10-01.5.3 for line of sight matrix. On a designated MS&R street, the SVTs are based on the MS&R cross-section.

25) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension both proposed drive thru lanes that are shown in plan view.

26) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension all curb radii in plan view for the vehicular use area.

27) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension the required 1-foot setback from the drive-thru lane to all associated building per UDC Sec.7.4.6.F.2.a.2.

28) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan package to provide a typical parking space detail for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. As wheel stops are proposed for the parking spaces provide a wheel stop location dimension per UDC Section 7.4.6.H.3.

29) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension all required wheel stops within the parking spaces that are adjacent to sidewalks and landscape areas to ensure the minimum 4-foot sidewalk areas and no encroachment into the landscape areas.

30) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan package to label in plan view the maneuverability for the proposed loading zone. Refer to AASHTO for the minimum turning radii for the truck size.

31) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.J: Revise the development plan package to label the future MS&R right-of-way for both 22nd St and Alvernon Way. If the existing right-of-way is at the future right-of-way clearly state on the development plan package "Existing/Future Right-of-Way" in plan view.

32) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.J: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension the future sidewalk area for both 22nd St and Alvernon Way. Label and dimension the MS&R future sidewalk area and the future sight visibility triangles based on the future MS&R cross section.

33) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.L: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension any proposed easements onsite. If there are proposed easements provide the recordation information in plan view.

34) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.2: Revise the development plan package to label all required wall openings per the Drainage Report. Verify in plan view that all location are clearly labeled and either provide a separate detail for the wall openings or revise Details 4&5/SD5 to clearly show the minimum wall openings and space between openings.

35) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.2: Revise the development plan package, Keynotes and any associated details to label the required minimum filter fabric specifications or provide a reference to PC/COT Standard Specification for Public Improvements Section 1014. The development plan package is to be used as the construction document for site and grading and must accurately label and detail all improvements for construction purposes.

36) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.6: Revise the development plan package to label the associated water surface elevation (WSEL) for the FEMA SFHA Zone AH in plan view. Refer to the Drainage Report comments below and verify that the Pad elevation is at or above the WSEL and that the lowest finish floor elevation is 1-foot above the calculated WSEL at the upstream end of the structure.

37) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project.

38) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension the required 4-foot sidewalk from the proposed building to Alvernon Way. Per TSM Sec.7-01.4.1.A at least one sidewalk is required to a project from each street on which the project has frontage, unless there is no vehicular access from a street because of a physical barrier, such as a drainageway or an unbroken security barrier (e.g., a wall or fence). The sidewalk should be located to minimize any conflict with vehicular access to the project.

39) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan package to clearly dimension all onsite sidewalks to ensure the minimum 4-foot width requirements per TSM Sec.7-01.4.3.A.

40) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.S: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension the minimum 6-foot width requirement for the sidewalk within the right-of-way of both 22nd St and Alvernon Way. For existing 4-foot sidewalk width along 22nd St and Alvernon Way verify conformance with handicap accessibility and if the sidewalk is in acceptable condition then per TSM Sec.10-01.4.1.A.1.c where sidewalks are less than five feet in width, passing spaces at least five feet by five feet will be located at reasonable intervals not to exceed 200 feet.

41) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.S: Revise the development plan package to verify conformance with handicap accessibility for the existing sidewalk within the right-of-way. Provide existing longitudinal and cross slopes to ensure maximum 2% or provide written approval from TDOT Permits and Codes that the existing sidewalk meets accessibility requirements.

42) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.T: Revise the development plan package to provide for centralized onsite solid waste and recycle collection service pick up per TSM Sec.8-01.5.1.A. Provide specific details on the development plan package for construction purposes. The details must match TSM Sec.8-01, Figure 2 and Figure 3a for the required double enclosure walls with gates, concrete thickness and compressive strength, concrete approach apron dimensions, space from wall to bollards, anchoring bolts, 14'x40' clear approach for each container, etc. Currently the proposed plan only calls out 1 metal container with APC for recycling; this will require prior approval from ES. Also the clear 14x40 foot approach needs to be clearly shown in plan view, it appears that the proposed curbing and parking encroach into this space, revise.


DRAINAGE REPORT:

43) TSM Sec.4-04.2.3.1.4.C.1: Revise the Drainage Report to include a calculation on the upstream end of the proposed structure to determine the water surface elevation for the FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area Zone AH. The SFHA on the FEMA FIRM Panels does have calculated water surface elevations and the Base Flood Elevation can be determined for the structure to ensure the proper 1-foot freeboard per TC Chapter 26 Sec.26-5.2.9. Label the water surface elevation on all exhibits and the development plan package sheets.

44) TSM Sec.4-04.2.3.2.D: Revise the Drainage Report with a discussion on the retention requirements for the property. The property falls within a non-designated basin however per the size of the parcel (>1acre) 5-year retention is required per the referenced section. Provide the retention calculation within the report and verify that the proposed landscape areas meet the volumes required to satisfy this requirement.

45) TSM Sec.4-04.4.2.1: Revise the Hydrologic Data Sheets within the Drainage Report to use the required 3-inches of rain in 60-minutes as per TSM Sec.4-04.4.2.1 and Table 4.1 within the PC Hydro procedure. The City of Tucson does not use the NOAA14 (90% UCL) rain fall depths, revise.


SWPPP:

46) CGP Sec.6.3(6)g: Revise the site map and the location of on-site material, waste; borrow areas, or equipment storage areas, and other supporting activities to be located outside of the proposed landscape/water harvesting area. These storage areas should be located so that they do not drain into the retention areas causing adverse pollution.


GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised Development Plan Package, Drainage Report and SWPPP that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments.

For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
01/27/2015 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed