Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T14CM08825
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/05/2015 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 01/08/2015 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Building plan can not be approved until verification that it matches an approved Development Plan Package. DP14-0212 is still under review and out for correction. Once the DP is approved ENG can stamp the building plan approved over the counter. JG |
| 01/13/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The Trifab charts shown on sheet A9.0 do not correspond to the Oldcastle glass data or to the vertical fenestration entries in the Building Envelope Elements Data chart. Provide certified U-factor, SHGC, visible transmittance (VT), and air leakage ratings for the proposed fenestration that have been determined by a laboratory accredited by a nationally recognized accreditation organization such as NFRC. Submit a COMcheck Envelope Compliance Certificate based on ASHRAE 90.1-2010 to demonstrate compliance with the energy codes. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012 and Sections 4.1.2 and 5.8.2.1, ASHRAE 90.1-2010. 2. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. The design conditions for the calculations shall conform to the exterior design conditions presented in Section C302.2, IECC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. Reference: Section 6.4.2.1, ASHRAE 90.1-2010. 3. The submitted COMcheck Mechanical Compliance Certificate is based on the 2009 IECC and shows that HVAC System 1 fails to comply with the code requirements. Submit a revised COMcheck Mechanical Compliance Certificate based on the 2012 IECC that shows all of the HVAC systems in compliance with the current code requirements. |
| 01/13/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. An approved 2-way cleanout fitting is a single fitting, not a field-assembled group of individual fittings as shown in detail 3/p1.0. Reference: Sections 708.3.5 and 708.5, IPC 2012. 2. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2586.06') is less than 12" below the first floor elevation (2587.0'). Provide a backwater valve per Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 01/13/2015 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Approval of DP14-0212 required. |
| 01/13/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 01/22/2015 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Approval subject to subsequent review due to potential bld. or structrural changes. Dan Santa Cruz Elect.Plans Examiner 520-837-9077 |
| 12/26/2014 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/31/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET T1.0; BUILDING ANALYSIS (SOUTH WALL AND SOUTH WALL CANOPY CONSTRUCTION): THESE WALL CONSTRUCTION NOTES LIST A U.L. DESIGN NUMBER. PROVIDE A DETAIL ON THE DRAWINGS OF BOTH OF THOSE WALL SECTIONS. 2. SHEET A1.0; DETAIL 20: FINISH THE DETAIL, SECTION, AND ELEVATION INDICATORS ON THE PLAN. 3. SHEET A1.0; DETAIL 13: INDICATE THE DISTANCE FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE SIGN TO FINISH GRADE (7'-0"). 4. SHEET A2.0; FLOOR PLAN: INDICATE ON THE DRAWINGS A CALCULATION FOR THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE OPEN AREA FOR THE SOUTH WALL. DOES THE AREA MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC TABLE 705.8 FOR UNPROTECTED OPENINGS? THE OPENINGS ON THE SOUTH WALL INCLUDE DOOR 1 AND THE OPENING TO THE COVERED WALK (SEE ELEVATION 20/A3.0). 5. SHEET A2.0; KEYNOTE 9: THE FLOOR PLAN DOES NOT SHOW ANY INDICATION OF 'LIGHT BROOM FINISHED CONCRETE'. CLARIFY. 6. SHEET A2.0; FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES: SHEET A2.0; FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTES 5, 6, AND 7 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 7. SHEET A2.0: SYMBOLS FOR THE DOOR TYPE AND FRAME TYPE INDICATE 'SEE SCHEDULE' AND 'SEE ELEVATIONS'. PROVIDE A SPECIFIC SHEET NUMBER FOR THE SCHEDULE AND ELEVATIONS. 8. SHEET A3.0; ELEVATION 20: SHOULD THE TITLE BE 'SOUTH ELEVATION'? VERIFY. 9. SHEET A3.0; ELEVATION KEYNOTES: NOTE 9 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE ELEVATIONS. VERIFY. 10. SHEET A4.0; ROOF PLAN: THE CANOPY AWNING ON THE WEST WALL MUST STOP A MINIMUM OF 10' FROM THE PROPERTY LINE ON THE SOUTH FOR FIRE PROTECTION PURPOSES. INDICATE ON THE DRAWING THAT REQUIREMENT IS MET, OR INDICATE HOW THE AWNING WILL BE PROTECTED FROM FIRE. 11. SHEET A6.0; SECTION 5: A SECTION/DETAIL REFERENCE IS INDICATED ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THIS SECTION, BUT NO REFERENCE NUMBER IS PROVIDED. VERIFY. 12. SHEET A6.0; DETAILS 6, 7, 8, 16, AND 20: A KEYNOTE 56 IS REFERENCED ON THESE DETAILS. REVISE. 13. SHEET A6.0; SECTION 16: A DETAIL 1/A6.0 IS REFERENCED AT THE TOP OF THE WALL. REVISE. 14. SHEET A6.0; DETAIL KEYNOTES: NOTES 22 AND 42 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE DETAILS. VERIFY. 15. SHEET A6.1; SECTION 12: PROVIDE A NOTE ON THE DRAWINGS INDICATING THE CORNICE ON TOP OF THE WALL MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTION 705.2. 16. SHEET A6.1; SECTION 8: A KEYNOTE 47 IS REFERENCED AT THE ROOF TRUSS. REVISE THE REFERENCE NUMBER. 17. SHEET A6.1; SECTION 8: A KEYNOTE 15 IS REFERENCED AT THE ROOF. IS THIS CORRECT AT THAT LOCATION? VERIFY. 18. SHEET A6.1; SECTION 8: A KEYNOTE 47 IS REFERENCED AT A JOIST IN THE CONCEALED SPACE. REVISE THE REFERENCE NUMBER. 19. SHEET A6.1; SECTION 16: A KEYNOTE 27 IS REFERENCED AT THE FINISH FLOOR LEVEL. REVISE THE REFERENCE NUMBER. 20. SHEET A6.1; DETAIL KEYNOTES: THERE ARE MANY NOTES THAT WERE NOT ON THE SECTIONS/DETAILS. REVIEW AND REVISE. 21. SHEETS A8.0, A8.1, A8.2, AND A9.0: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE VERBIAGE IN THE NOTES. 22. GENERAL: PROVIDE A NOTE ON THE DRAWINGS INDICATING THE IBC SECTION 718.4.3 REQUIREMENTS FOR DRAFTSTOPPING ARE MET IN THE SPACE ABOVE THE COVERED WALK. 23. SHEET S1.1: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE STRUCTURAL NOTES. 24. SHEET S1.3; DETAIL 19: NO CALCULATIONS WERE LOCATED FOR THE LIGHT POLE FOUNDATION. VERIFY. 25. SHEET S2.1 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET MW16): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE MW-3 REQUIRES A 4'-0" WIDE X 2'-0" DEEP X 6'-8" LONG FOOTING. THAT FOOTING DOES NOT APPEAR ON THE FOUNDATION PLAN. CLARIFY. 26. SHEET S2.1 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET L23): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE FOOTINGS ON GRID A REQUIRE A 4'-0" WIDE X 2'-0" DEEP X 9'-0" LONG FOOTING. THE FOUNDATION PLAN AT SEVERAL OF THOSE FOOTINGS (WF3) ARE ONLY 8'-8" LONG (3'-0" + 2'-8" + 3'-0"). CLARIFY. 27. SHEET S5.1; DETAIL 205: ADD DETAIL NOTES. 28. SHEET S5.1; SECTION 206: NOTE 24 REFERENCES DETAIL 223/S5.3 FOR THE BRACE CONNECTION TO THE ROOF TRUSS. REVISE THE SECTION REFERENCE. 29. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/18/2015 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |