Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T14CM08778
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/05/2015 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET A0.0; REQUIRED PLUMBING FIXTURE CALCULATION: THE DRAWING INDICATES ONE SERVICE SINK IS REQUIRED, AND 0 ARE PROVIDED. CLARIFY. 2. SHEETS D1.1, A1.1, A1.3, AND A3.1: PROVIDE NORTH ARROWS ON THE PLANS. 3. SHEET A1.1; FLOOR PLAN: THE IBC TABLE 2902.1 REQUIRES ONE MALE AND ONE FEMALE RESTROOM, AND EACH MUST BE HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE PER THE IBC SECTION 1109. INDICATING A NEW RESTROOM AS 'UNISEX' DOES NOT RELIEVE IT OF BEING HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE. REVISE THE PLAN. 4. SHEET A1.1; FLOOR PLAN: PER THE IBC SECTION 1014.3 AND TABLE 1014.3, THE COMMON PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL IS REQUIRED TO BE A MAXIMUM OF 100 FEET. INDICATE ON THE PLAN THAT THE COMMON PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL FROM THE BULLPEN ROOM 4 TO THE EXIT IN THE EXISTING BULLPEN ROOM 1 MEETS THAT REQUIREMENT, THUS ELIMINATING THE NEED FOR A SECOND EXIT. 5. SHEET A1.1; FLOOR PLAN: INDICATE ON THE DRAWINGS THAT A FIRE RESISTANCE RATING FOR THE CORRIDOR IS NOT REQUIRED PER THE IBC SECTION 1018.1, EXCEPTION 4, AND TABLE 1018.1. 6. SHEET A1.1; FLOOR PLAN: VERIFY ALL EXIT SIGNAGE AND ILLUMINATION IS PROVIDED AS REQUIRED BY THE IBC SECTION 1011. 7. SHEET A1.1; FLOOR PLAN (UNISEX RESTROOM 6): DOOR 6 INTO THE RESTROOM REQUIRES AN 18" MINIMUM CLEARANCE ON THE PULL SIDE PER ICC/ANSI FIGURE 404.2.3.2(a). PROVIDE. 8. SHEET A1.1; FLOOR PLAN (UNISEX RESTROOM 6): DOOR 12 INTO THE RESTROOM REQUIRES AN 18" MINIMUM CLEARANCE ON THE PULL SIDE PER ICC/ANSI FIGURE 404.2.3.2(a). THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER PROHIBITS THAT CLEARANCE. PROVIDE. 9. SHEET A1.1; FLOOR PLAN (UNISEX RESTROOM 6): DOOR 12 OUT OF THE RESTROOM REQUIRES A 12" MINIMUM CLEARANCE ON THE PUSH SIDE PER ICC/ANSI 404.2.3.2(b). PROVIDE. 10. SHEET A1.1; FLOOR PLAN (UNISEX RESTROOM 6): THE SINK INTERFERES WITH THE REQUIRED 30" X 48" MANEUVERING CLEARANCE AT THE EXIT DOOR PER ICC/ANSI FIGURE 404.2.3.2(b). PROVIDE. 11. SHEET A1.1; WALL SCHEDULE: WALL TYPE WT-1 INDICATES 2X8" STEEL STUDS. THERE IS NO 8" STEEL STUD LISTED IN THE NON-BEARING INTERIOR WALL SCHEDULE ON SHEET A1.0. ADD THAT STUD TO THE SCHEDULE (IS THIS A WOOD STUD?). 12. SHEET S2.1; FOUNDATION AND FRAMING PLANS: PROVIDE NORTH ARROWS ON THE PLANS. 13. SHEET S2.1 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: NO CALCULATIONS WERE LOCATED FOR THE WOOD COLUMN OR FOOTING SUPPORTING THE NEW ROOF BEAM. PROVIDE. 14. SHEET S2.1 (FOUNDATION PLAN); SHEET A1.1 (FLOOR PLAN): KEYNOTE 7 ON SHEET S2.1 INDICATES A NEW 2X4 WALL, WHILE WALL TYPE WT-1 ON SHEET A1.1 INDICATES 2X8" STEEL STUDS. COORDINATE. 15. SHEET S2.1; FOUNDATION PLAN: FINISH THE SECTION CUT IN THE NEW EXTERIOR WALL. 16. SHEET S3.1; DETAIL 105: IN NOTE 6, GIVE THE EMBEDMENT LENGTH OF THE DOWEL INTO THE EXISTING FOUNDATION AND INDICATE TO EPOXY THAT DOWEL. 17. GENERAL: PROVIDE TWO SETS OF STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS. 18. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 01/12/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide a design for the guards for equipment located within 10 feet of the roof edge. Reference: Section 304.11, IMC 2012. 2. Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drain for RTU-1. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2012 as amended by the City of Tucson. 3. Revise the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust fans so that all of the air supplied to the restrooms will be exhausted. Reference: Section 403.2.1 (4), IMC 2012. 4. Clarify how existing office #2 is being ventilated. Reference: Section 401.2, IMC 2012. 5. Revise the mechanical design as required to avoid using the corridor as a return air duct. Reference: Section 601.2, IMC 2012. 6. Coordinate the Packaged Gas/Electric Unit Schedule with the mechanical design (i.e. 2.5-tons or 3-tons?). Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 7. Demonstrate energy code compliance for the addition to the building envelope using calculations based on the current code. Reference: Sections C101.4.3, C101.5, and C103.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. 8. Provide NFRC fenestration product ratings for the U-factor and the SHGC values on COMcheck or use the appropriate default U-factor and SHGC values from Tables C303.1.3 (1), C303.1.3 (2) and C303.1.3.(3), IECC 2012. Reference: Section C303.1.3, IECC 2012. 9. Show how the "Additional Efficiency Package Requirements" noted in COMcheck (C406, IECC 2012) is to be accomplished. Reference: Section C401.2, IECC 2012. |
| 01/12/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide the minimum plumbing facilities required by Table 2902.1 and Section 2902.2, IBC 2012, for business occupancy (e.g. a service sink and a drinking fountain). Note that a new drinking fountain is called for in keynote 10, sheet A1.1 and keynote 12, sheet 1.2. Reference: Section 410.2, IPC 2012. 2. Show the proposed supply and waste piping serving the relocated lavatory along with the affected existing piping on the plumbing floor plan on sheet P1.1. Provide sufficient information to show that the installation of the new plumbing fixtures will not cause the existing water supply and sanitary waste systems to become overloaded. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 3. Provide an automatic faucet for the relocated lavatory, dispensing a maximum of 0.25 gallons per metering cycle. Reference: Section 416.6, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 4. Provide tempered water for the relocated lavatory using an approved device conforming to ASSE 1070. Reference: Sections 416.5 and 607.1.2, IPC 2012. |
| 01/12/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide the size of the water meter serving this building, the size of the backflow preventer associated with the water meter, and the total water demand served by the water meter. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. |
| 01/20/2015 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Academy of Math and Science Office Addition T14CM08778 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 20, 2015 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve until development package DP14-0243 has been approved. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 01/20/2015 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/21/2015 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ENG can not approve the building plan until approval of the development plan package (DP14-0243). ENG will stmap the building plan approved over the counter upon approval of the DP Package. JG |
| 12/29/2014 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Please provide occupant load calculations for indiviual rooms and total space. Be advised corridors serving an occupant load greater than 30 require 1 hour rating. With loss of door on east (?) side, 75' travel distance appears to be exceeded. May require exit sign on west exit. Verify with building, electrical reviewers. |