Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T14CM08711
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/08/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide a direct connection to the building drainage system for all plumbing fixtures except as allowed by Chapter 8, IPC 2012. Reference: Section 301.3, IPC 2012. 2. Provide calculations showing how the water supply piping has been sized. Show how the new water piping relates to the existing water supply system and show that the additional connections do not cause the existing piping to be overloaded. Reference: Sections 604.1 and 604.3, IPC 2012 and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 3. The use of an island vent is restricted to sinks and lavatories (detail 05/P-401. Reference: Section 916.1, IPC 2012. 4. Verify that all of the vents (except for vents serving interceptors located outdoors) rise vertically to at least 6" above the flood rims of the fixtures they protect prior to running horizontally. Reference: Section 905.4, IPC 2012. 5. Provide a vent downstream of the gravity grease separator to protect the seal for the grease separator. (A vent upstream of the gravity grease interceptor is not required.) Reference: Section 1003.9, IPC 2012. |
| 01/08/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation using the current code. Reference: Section 403.2, IMC 2012. 2. Provide general room exhaust for any cooking appliance that does not require the installation of a Type II hood. The minimum exhaust rate shall be 0.70 CFM per square foot, using a minimum area of 100 square feet for each individual appliance. Reference: Section 507.2.2, IMC 2012. |
| 01/08/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide the size of the water meter serving this suite, the size of the backflow preventer associated with the water meter, and the total water demand served by the water meter (include the demand for other suites if they are served by the same meter). Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. |
| 01/13/2015 | KEN VAN KARSEN | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 01/13/2015 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | Show the patio area on an approved DP. |
| 01/14/2015 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 1209 W IRVINGTON RD St: #150 T14CM08711 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 14, 2015 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve until a development package showing the outdoor seating has been approved. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 12/26/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET G-001; SITE INFORMATION/OCCUPANCY: THE OCCUPANT LOAD IS LISTED AS 36, BUT THE SEATING SUMMARY (PROPOSED) TOTALS 43 OCCUPANTS (33 INDOOR + 10 OUTDOOR). CLARIFY ON THE DRAWINGS. 2. SHEET G-002; KEYNOTES: INDICATE ON NOTE 2 THAT THE 44" IS MINIMUM CLEAR WIDTH. 3. SHEET G-003; DETAIL 4: THE 'WATER CLOSET SIDE' ELEVATION DOES NOT INDICATE THE VERTICAL GRAB BAR. PROVIDE. 4. SHEET I-110; FLOOR PLAN: THE CORRECT OCCUPANCY TYPE IS AN A-2 (RESTAURANT), BUT THE IBC SECTION 303.1.1 ALLOWS A GROUP B OCCUPANCY SINCE THE OCCUPANT LOAD IS LESS THAN 50. TABLE 2902.1 WILL STILL REQUIRE ONE MALE AND ONE FEMALE ACCESSIBLE RESTROOM. REVISE THE DRAWING. 5. GENERAL: SINCE THE NEW HOT WATER HEATER IS BEING SUPPORTED BY AN EXISTING FRAME, WHAT IS THE WEIGHT COMPARISON BETWEEN THE NEW AND OLD UNITS? VERIFY. 6. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |