Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T14CM08635
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/30/2015 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. ALL RESPONSES TO THE PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ACCEPTED AND APPROVED. HOWEVER, THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES TWO SETS OF THE FINAL STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS BE SUBMITTED. IN THIS CASE, ONLY ONE SET WAS PROVIDED. |
| 02/02/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 02/03/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Verify that the thermostatic mixing valves associated with the specified lavatory faucets are listed to ASSE 1070. [Initial comment: Clarify how the installation of the ASSE 1070 mixing valve shown in the lavatory piping diagram on sheet P5.1 complies with the manufacturer's installation instructions. Reference: Section 304.1, IPC 2012.] 2. The Pima County Health Department requires hand sinks to be used for hand washing only; provide a direct waste connection. [Initial comment: Clarify the reason for using indirect waste connections for the pre-rinse sink (K69) and hand sink (K30) and for the soiled dish table (K68). Reference: Section 802.1, IPC 2012.] 3. The scuppers shown on sheet A3.1 (and detail A6/A8.6) are the primary roof drains. Secondary drains shall provide the same capacity as the primary roof drains when the primary drains are blocked and shall have discharge points separate from the primary drains. [Initial comment: Provide secondary (overflow) roof drainage. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1108, IPC 2012, and Sections 1611.1 and 1611.3, IBC 2012.] |
| 02/04/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The submitted heating and cooling loads cannot be evaluated because the cooling capacities for the proposed equipment are not shown on the equipment schedule. [Initial comment: Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference: Section 6.4.2.1, ASHRAE 90.1-2010.] 2. Correct the note on sheet P2.1 that calls for the condensate drains to be routed "indirectly to roof drain" instead of terminating at the mop sink as noted in your reply to the initial comments. [Initial comment: Condensate drains may not terminate over a roof drain unless the roof drain terminates at or below grade in an area capable of absorbing the condensate flow without surface drainage. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.] 3. The lack of an exact listing in Table 403.3, IMC 2012 is not acceptable as a reason for not providing ventilation to occupiable areas. Closets, walk-in coolers, and other non-occupiable areas obviously can be ignored but the occupiable areas must be ventilated. See Section 403.3, IMC 2012. [Initial comment: Revise the ventilation calculations so that the room and area numbers used in the calculation correspond to those on the architectural floor plan. The ventilation calculations shall conform to those described in Section 403.3, IMC 2012. Clarify why the zone air distribution effectiveness (Table 403.3.1.2) appears to be 1.0 instead of 0.8 per Section 403.3.1.2, IMC 2012.] |
| 02/06/2015 | KEN VAN KARSEN | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 02/23/2015 | SPOWELL1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Needs Review |