Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T14CM08635
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/05/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide the total water demand to be served by the proposed water meter for domestic use. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. |
| 01/06/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The COMcheck Compliance Certificates shown on sheet ACS2 are not legible. The certificates provided on letter-size paper are sufficient. The COMcheck inspection checklists are not required by the City of Tucson. 2. Provide U-factor, SHGC, visible transmittance (VT), and air leakage ratings for the proposed fenestration that have been determined by a laboratory accredited by a nationally recognized accreditation organization such as NFRC. Reference: Section 5.8.2.1, ASHRAE 90.1-2010. 3. Provide doors with a permanent nameplate showing the U-factor and air leakage rate for each door or provide a signed and dated certification of the doors that lists their U-factor and air leakage rate. Reference: Section 5.8.2.3, ASHRAE 90.1-2010. 4. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference: Section 6.4.2.1, ASHRAE 90.1-2010. 5. Condensate drains may not terminate over a roof drain unless the roof drain terminates at or below grade in an area capable of absorbing the condensate flow without surface drainage. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 6. Revise the ventilation calculations so that the room and area numbers used in the calculation correspond to those on the architectural floor plan. The ventilation calculations shall conform to those described in Section 403.3, IMC 2012. Clarify why the zone air distribution effectiveness (Table 403.3.1.2) appears to be 1.0 instead of 0.8 per Section 403.3.1.2, IMC 2012. 7. The mechanical plan shows high velocity diffusers for the make up air system in close proximity to the face of the Type I hoods. Verify that the location and type of make up air outlets complies with the hood manufacturer's installation instructions and does not reduce the effectiveness of the exhaust systems. Reference: Sections 304.1 and 508.1, IMC 2012. |
| 01/06/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide details showing how the area under the mop sink and the joint between the floor drain and the floor surface are to be made water-tight. Reference: Sections 405.4 and 405.5, IPC 2012. 2. Clarify how the installation of the ASSE 1070 mixing valve shown in the lavatory piping diagram on sheet P5.1 complies with the manufacturer's installation instructions. Reference: Section 304.1, IPC 2012. 3. Provide automatic faucets for the lavatories, dispensing a maximum of 0.25 gallons per metering cycle. Reference: Section 416.6, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 4. Provide calculations showing how the water supply piping has been sized. Reference: Sections 604.1 and 604.3, IPC 2012. 5. Verify that the pipe sizes called out for the flush valves will not result in water velocities greater than that recommended by the pipe manufacturer (e.g. limit the water velocity to less than 8 FPS for copper, PEX, or CPVC piping). At a minimum design flow rate of 25 GPM for a siphonic, flush-valve water closet, a 1" schedule 40 CPVC pipe has a flow velocity of 9.3 FPS. Reference: Table 604.3, IPC 2012. 6. Provide separate indirect waste pipes for each compartment of the 4-compartment and 2-compartment sinks to protect against cross-contamination or fouling. Reference: Sections 801.2 and 802.1.8, IPC 2012. 7. Clarify the reason for using indirect waste connections for the pre-rinse sink (K69) and hand sink (K30) and for the soiled dish table (K68). Reference: Section 802.1, IPC 2012. 8. Clarify the trap requirements for the indirect waste piping; two different versions of the requirements are shown on sheet P2.1. Reference: Section 802.2, IPC 2012 and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 9. Provide sizing calculations for the gravity grease interceptor using the method shown in Section 1003.3, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 10. Revise the sanitary grease interceptor detail to show the vent originating at the outlet side of the tank, not from the center of the tank and the inlet to the tank. Reference: Section 1003.9, IPC 2012. 11. Show how storm water is to be prevented from entering the sanitary drain system at the trash enclosure. Reference: Section 1101.3, IPC 2012. 12. Provide secondary (overflow) roof drainage. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1108, IPC 2012, and Sections 1611.1 and 1611.3, IBC 2012. 13. Revise or eliminate the gas load schedules on sheets P1.1 and P3.1 to coordinate with the gas load schedules on sheets P2.3 and P4.3 and the HVAC equipment schedule on sheet AC1.1 (RTU-3 appears to have a gas input of only 60 MBH). 14. Revise the natural gas isometric to show the developed lengths of the piping from the meter to each appliance. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. |
| 01/08/2015 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Final approval of DP14-0146 required. |
| 01/09/2015 | KEN VAN KARSEN | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | T15CM08635 1. City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code (Ord #10963) compliance: Compare total fixture output to the budget based on property size and zone location (Table 401.1). a. Include all exterior (existing) fixtures within the property lines. The ordinance requires identification of each fixture type (both Full-Cut-Off and un-shielded); and fixture output based on a typical lamp lumen output at the maximum fixture wattage rating. Include landscape fixtures in the existing total and determine the qualified option limit. b. The rated color temperature of proposed fixtures shall not exceed 3500K, Section 402. Notate plans, or provide manufacturer spec sheet with color temperature rating. The 2012 Outdoor Lighting Code may be found on The City of Tucson Website under: www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd; Codes, Standards, Ordinances & Guidelines; Building Codes. Ken Van Karsen Electrical Plan Review PDSD, City of Tucson 520-837-4912 Kenneth.VanKarsen@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/17/2014 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/23/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET T1.1; BUILDING CODE DATA: REVISE THE ACCESSIBILITY REFERENCE TO THE 2009 EDITION OF THE ICC/ANSI A117.1. 2. SHEET A1.2; FLOOR PLAN: BETWEEN GRIDS 4 AND 5 ON THE SOUTH WALL, CHANGE THE SECTION CUT A1/A6.5 TO 'SIMILAR'. 3. SHEET A8.1; DETAIL H9: THE LEFT PORTION OF THIS DETAIL INDICATES 'COOLER'. REVISE. 4. SHEET A8.2; DETAILS I.1, I.5, AND I.8: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE VERBIAGE. 5. SHEET S1.1 (TRASH ENCLOSURE FOUNDATION PLAN); SHEET S2.1 (FOUNDATION PLAN); SHEET S3.1 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN): PROVIDE NORTH ARROWS ON THE PLANS. 6. SHEET S2.1 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (LATERAL DESIGN): THE KEY PLAN IN THE CALCULAITONS FOR THE SHEAR WALL LAYOUT DOES NOT MATCH THE FOUNDATION PLAN. CLARIFY. 7. SHEET S3.1; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: NEAR GRIDS A AND 6, A DETAIL A9/S4.2 IS CUT AT THE WALL AND CANOPY. IS THIS DETAIL CORRECT AT THAT LOCATION? NO CANOPY OR LINTEL ARE INDICATED ON THE DETAIL. 8. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (FOUNDATIONS): PROVIDE A KEY PLAN IN THE CALCULATIONS IDENTIFYING THE VARIOUS FOOTING DESIGNS. 9. GENERAL: PROVIDE AN EXITING/EGRESS PLAN IN THE DRAWINGS. 10. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/28/2015 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |