Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T14CM08365
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/02/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide tempered water for the lavatories and public hand-washing sinks in restrooms using approved devices conforming to ASSE 1070. Reference: Sections 416.5 and 607.1.2, IPC 2012. 2. Provide a water pressure regulator conforming to ASSE 1003 or CSA B356 to limit the water pressure to 80 PSI or less. Revise the water pressure calculations as required. Reference: Section 604.8, IPC 2012 and Section E103.3 (1), Appendix E, IPC 2012. 3. Show that the proposed backflow preventers (Watts SD-3 dual-check with an atmospheric vent) to be accessible for inspection, maintenance and water leakage will not cause damage. Reference: Section 608.14, IPC 2012. 4. Verify the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (the rim elevations and inverts shown on sheet C1 appear to be incorrect) and the first floor elevation. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 5. Provide roof drainage and hydraulic size calculations for the scuppers for the new roof over the service area based on the 100-year hourly rainfall rate for Tucson, 3" per hour. Show how overflow protection for the roof is to be provided. Reference: Sections 1101.7, 1106.1, 1106.4, and 1108.3, IPC 2012, and Sections 1611.1 and 1611.3, IBC 2012. 6. Verify the basis for the gas pipe sizes; using Table 402.4 (1), IFGC 2012 with a developed length of 200 feet shows that many of the pipes are undersized. If Table 402.4 (2), IFGC 2012 is used, only the existing pipe serving RTU-2 and RTU-3 is undersized. Check also the total gas load shown on sheet P1.2: the mechanical schedule shows a total connected load of 790 CFH. Reference: Section 402.3, IFGC 2012. |
| 01/02/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the additions (new construction) to the building envelope; use the climate zone for Tucson. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the additions to the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections C101.4.3, C101.5, and C103.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. 2. Demonstrate energy code compliance for the alterations to the existing building envelope based on the current code. Reference: Sections C101.4.3, C101.5, and C103.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. 3. Provide NFRC fenestration product ratings for the U-factor and the SHGC values on COMcheck or use the appropriate default U-factor and SHGC values from Tables C303.1.3 (1), C303.1.3 (2) and C303.1.3.(3), IECC 2012. Reference: Section C303.1.3, IECC 2012. 4. Show that the proposed replacement rooftop units meet the requirements of Sections C403.2.2, C403.2.3, C403.2, and C403.3 (e.g. provide the mechanical energy code compliance certification from COMcheck). Reference: Section C303.1, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. 5. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012. 6. Clarify the differences between the partition arrangements shown in the Service Area (31 and 32) on sheet A1 and sheet M1.1. The mechanical background appears to show the area sub-divided into six rooms and a corridor but the architectural floor plan just shows a large open area (the reflected ceiling plan and the backgrounds for the plumbing plans agree with the mechanical plan). Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012 and Section 601.2, IMC 2012. |
| 01/05/2015 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Jim Click Dodge - Remodel T14CM08365 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 5, 2015 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve until development package DP14-0223 has been approved. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 01/06/2015 | KEN VAN KARSEN | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | T14CM08365 2012 IECC (interior) lighting calculation: provide ComCheck report, or Table C405.5.2(1) building area or (2) space-by-space for budget determination. Ken Van Karsen Electrical Plan Review PDSD, City of Tucson 520-837-4906 Kenneth.VanKarsen@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/16/2014 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/16/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET T1; DEVELOPMENT DATA: PROVIDE THE OCCUPANCY LOAD ON THE DRAWINGS FOR THE NEW S-2 AREA AND THE NEW B AREA. 2. SHEET T1; DEVELOPMENT DATA: IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW THE NEW BUILDING PORTIONS ARE BROKEN DOWN AS FAR AS SF AND OCCUPANCY TYPES. FOR ALL NEW BUILDINGS/STRUCTURES, LIST THE SF, OCCUPANCY TYPE, AND OCCUPANCY LOAD ON THIS SHEET. 3. SHEET T1: PROVIDE A PLUMBING FIXTURES ANALYSIS ON THIS SHEET, INDICATING THE NUMBER OF WATER CLOSETS (M/F), LAVATORIES (M/F), DRINKING FOUNTAINS, AND SERVICE SINKS AS REQUIRED BY THE IBC TABLE 2902.1. IN ADDITION, LIST THOSE PLUMBING FIXTURES PROVIDED. 4. SHEET A1; FLOOR PLAN: THE NEW CORRIDOR 12 APPEARS TO BE A DEAD END CORRIDOR THAT EXCEEDS THE ALLOWABLE LENGTH OF THE IBC SECTION 1018.4. VERIFY. 5. SHEET A3 (BUILDING SECTION A); SHEET A4.1 (WALL SECTION 1): WHERE WALL SECTION 1 IS INDICATED ON BUILDING SECTION A, THE CEILING HEIGHTS VARY. WALL SECTION 1 INDICATES THE CEILINGS AT THE SAME HEIGHT. CLARIFY. 6. SHEET A4.3; ROOF ACCESS LADDER DETAIL 4: ON THE BUILDING PLAN (SHEET A1), PROVIDE A REFERENCE NOTE OR DETAIL INDICATOR FOR THE ROOF ACCESS LADDER. 7. SHEET A6; DOOR SCHEDULE: ADD A NOTE TO THIS SCHEDULE TO REFERENCE THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE DOOR HARDWARE. 8. SHEET A9: PROVIDE THE MILLWORK AND COUNTER HEIGHTS WHERE REQUIRED TO MEET ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS. 9. SHEETS S1.0 AND S1.1; SPECIAL INSPECTIONS: THESE NOTES ARE DUPLICATED. 10. SHEET S2.1; FRAMING KEYNOTES: ADD THE NUMBER 12 TO THE LAST KEYNOTE. 11. GENERAL: PROVIDE AN EXITING PLAN ON THE DRAWINGS. 12. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 12/19/2014 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | DP must be approved first. |
| 12/19/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Needs Review | |
| 12/31/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed |