Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T14CM08229
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/07/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide fixture descriptions for all plumbing fixtures (e.g. manufacturer's model numbers or material standards for listed fixtures). Reference: Section 402, IPC 2012 and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 2. Provide automatic faucets for the restroom lavatories, dispensing a maximum of 0.25 gallons per metering cycle. Reference: Section 416.6, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 3. Provide tempered water for the lavatories and public hand-washing sinks in restrooms using approved devices conforming to ASSE 1070. Reference: Sections 416.5 and 607.1.2, IPC 2012. 4. The proposed "booster heater for the laundry area (Bosch ES4) has a storage tank. Provide a detail of the water heater installation, including the excess pressure relief, expansion tank, safety pan, and valves. Reference: Sections 503, 504, 606.1, and 607.3, IPC 2012. 5. Clarify the listing information for the proposed Symmons tempering valve shown in detail 1/P2 has an obsolete model number. |
| 01/07/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Tucson Water limits 1" water meters to a maximum demand of 37.5 GPM. Provide a letter from Tucson Water confirming that the use of a 1" water meter will be allowed for this project (84.25 fixture units equates to a demand of 39 GPM in a predominately flush tank system). |
| 01/07/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Demonstrate energy code compliance for the alterations to the building envelope (i.e. window replacement) based on the current code. Provide NFRC fenestration product ratings for the U-factor and the SHGC values on COMcheck or use the appropriate default U-factor and SHGC values from Tables C303.1.3 (1), C303.1.3 (2) and C303.1.3.(3), IECC 2012. Reference: Sections C101.4.3, C101.5, C103.2, and C303.1.3, IECC 2012. 2. If the exercise area in AC zone 3 is a change of use, provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation using the current code. Reference: Section 403.2, IMC 2012. |
| 01/13/2015 | KEN VAN KARSEN | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 12/17/2014 | CPIERCE1 | WWM | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 12/18/2014 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/29/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET A1; DEMOLITION PLAN: ADD KEYED NOTE 5 TO THE NEW FOOTING SOUTH OF GRID 5 AND WEST OF GRID 6. 2. SHEET A2: PROVIDE NOTES ON THE DRAWINGS FOR THE CONCRETE STRENGTH, REINFORCING, ALLOWABLE FOUNDATION BEARING VALUE, WELDS, STRUCTURAL BOLT STRENGTHS, MASONRY VALUES, ETC. 3. SHEET A3; CANOPY FRAMING PLAN: ON GRID A BETWEEN GRIDS 2 AND 3, THERE IS A DETAIL REFERENCE 7A/A9.1. SHOULD THE SHEET REFERENCED BE A9.0? VERIFY. 4. SHEET A3 (CANOPY FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: NO CALCULATIONS WERE LOCATED FOR THE NEW WOOD FRAMING AT THE EXERCISE ROOM. PROVIDE. 5. SHEET A4; KEYED NOTES: NOTES 11, 30, 33, AND 34 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 6. SHEET A5; KEYED NOTES: NOTE 14 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 7. SHEET A5; KEYED NOTES: ON NOTE 17, PROVIDE THE SPECIFIC DETAIL NUMBER (9/A9.2). 8. SHEET A6; KEYED NOTES: NOTE 11 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 9. SHEET A8; KEYED NOTES: NOTES 1, 5, 22, 30, AND 31 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE ELEVATIONS. VERIFY. 10. SHEET A9.1; DETAIL 15: CALL OUT THE BENT PLATE AT THE TOP OF THE BEAM AND ITS CONNECTION TO THE BEAM. 11. SHEET A9.2; DETAIL 12: HOW IS THIS BRACE CONNECTED TO THE WALL? PROVIDE. 12. SHEET A9.3; DETAIL 1 (SIDE WALL): PROVIDE THE LOCATION OF THE VERTICAL GRAB BAR. 13. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: NO CALCULATIONS WERE LOCATED FOR THE SOLAR CANOPY PIER AND FOOTING DESIGN SHOWN ON DETAIL 6/A9.1. PROVIDE. 14. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: NO CALCULATIONS WERE LOCATED FOR THE FOOTING DESIGN SHOWN ON DETAIL 10/A9.1. PROVIDE. 15. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: NO CALCULATIONS WERE LOCATED FOR THE EXISTING FOOTINGS SUPPORTING NEW CANOPY FRAMES. PROVIDE. 16. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/16/2015 | SHANAE POWELL | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/16/2015 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |