Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Permit Number - T14CM07897
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
01/02/2015 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
01/07/2015 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. PREVIOUS COMMENT 20; DETAIL 3/A.7: THE DETAIL 3/A.7 NOW REFERENCES DETAIL 5/A.12. THERE IS NO DETAIL 5 ON SHEET A.12. PROVIDE. |
01/15/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide the documentation for the thermal characteristics of the masonry walls with a U-factor of 0.041 BTUH/Ft2 ºF. Not all of the roof types have all of the insulation above the deck; revise the COMcheck component descriptions to reflect the actual roof construction (see sheet A.3). [Initial comment: Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Building components labeled as "other" on COMcheck require documentation of the proposed U-factors. Reference: Sections C103.2 and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.] |
01/15/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide hydraulic scupper size calculations based on the 100-year hourly rainfall rate for Tucson, 3" per hour. Include the effect of any vertical walls that can divert rainfall onto the individual roof areas. Provide overflow protection for the roof areas utilizing scuppers for drainage. Reference: Sections 1106.1, 1106.4, and 1108.3, IPC 2012. [Initial comment: Provide roof drainage calculations and plans. Provide overflow protection for the roof; include the effect of any vertical walls that can divert rainfall onto the roof. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1108, IPC 2012.] |
01/20/2015 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Sabino Road Baptist Church T14CM07897 Building Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning has reviewed the building plans and they appear to comply with the approved development package. 3. Zoning has reviewed the building plans but will not approve until all other PDSD review agencies have approved the plans. 4. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
01/21/2015 | KEN VAN KARSEN | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
01/22/2015 | KROBLES1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
01/22/2015 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
01/22/2015 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |