Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T14CM07897
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/20/2014 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Panic hardware shall be installed per section 1008.1.10 of the 2012 IFC and IBC. |
| 11/21/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET C.1; SPECIAL INSPECTIONS: NO INSPECTIONS ARE LISTED UNDER THIS HEADING. VERIFY. 2. SHEET C.2; CODE REVIEW (2c): REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE IBC TABLE 803.4 FOR FLAMESPREAD RATINGS. REVISE THE IBC REFERENCE TO THE 2012 EDITION. 3. SHEET C.2; CODE REVIEW (4c): REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE IBC TABLE 1017.1 FOR CORRIDOR PROTECTION. REVISE THE IBC REFERENCE TO THE 2012 EDITION. 4. SHEET C.2; CODE REVIEW (6): THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF WATER CLOSETS INDICATED CAN BE REVISED BY USING THE MALE AND FEMALE MINIMUM NUMBER OF PLUMBING FIXTURES FOR 'PLACES OF WORSHIP' (TABLE 2902.1). 5. SHEET C.2; CODE REVIEW; EGRESS PLAN: THE CODE REVIEW (4) INDICATES 445 TOTAL OCCUPANTS, WHILE THE EGRESS PLAN INDICATES 477 OCCUPANTS. CLARIFY. 6. SHEET C.2; SEATING PLAN: INDICATE ON THE DRAWINGS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTIONS 1028.10.2 AND 1028.10.2.1 ARE MET FOR MINIMUM ASSEMBLY AISLE CLEARANCES. SHOW THE WIDTH CALCULATIONS ON THE DRAWINGS. 7. SHEET C.2; SEATING PLAN: INDICATE ON THE DRAWINGS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTION 1028.9 ARE MET FOR THE MINIMUM ASSEMBLY AISLE WIDTHS. SHOW THE WIDTH CALCULATIONS ON THE DRAWINGS. 8. SHEET C.2; SEATING PLAN: IT DOESN'T APPEAR THE ACCESSIBLE WHEEL CHAIR SPACES REQUIRED PER THE IBC TABLE 1108.2.2.1 ARE PROVIDED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY AND SHOW THE CALCULATION ON THE DRAWINGS. 9. SHEET A.1; GENERAL INTERIOR NOTES (1): NOTE 1 REFERENCES INSULATION FOR 'BATH, LAUNDRY, AND BED ROOMS'. IS THIS NOTE PERTINENT TO THIS JOB? 10. SHEET A.1; FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTES 3, 5, 7, AND 9 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 11. SHEET A.1; FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTE 10 REFERENCES WALLS 'UP TO SECOND LEVEL'. WHERE IS THE SECOND LEVEL? 12. SHEET A.1; FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTE 12 REFERENCES A 'WATER HEATER ABOVE'. PROVIDE A DETAIL ON THE DRAWINGS FOR THE SUPPORT OF THE WATER HEATER. 13. SHEET A.1; FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTE 13 REFERENCES A 'ROOF ACCESS LADDER". PROVIDE DETAILS ON THE DRAWINGS OF THE LADDER CONSTRUCTION AND CONNECTION TO THE WALL. 14. SHEET A.1 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A.3 (WALL TYPES): IT DOESN'T APPEAR ALL OF THE WALLS SHOWN ON THE FLOOR PLAN HAVE WALL TYPE IDENTIFICATIONS AS SHOWN ON A/3. VERIFY. 15. SHEET A.3; WALL TYPES SECTION: A SECTION NOTE REFERENCES THE 2006 IECC FOR WINDOW AND WALL INSULATION. REVISE THE EDITION OF THE CODE AND PERTINENT SECTIONS. 16. SHEET A.3; WALL TYPE SECTIONS (MASONRY WALL): THIS WALL TYPE INDICATES A TWO HOUR RATED WALL. IS THIS REQUIRED? VERIFY. 17. SHEET A.4; REFLECTED CEILING PLAN: IN THE CHANCEL AREA, TWO CEILING HEIGHT INDICATOR SYMBOLS REFERENCE 'HEIGHT'. FINISH THOSE WITH A SPECIFIC CEILING HEIGHT. 18. SHEET A.5; ROOF PLAN (ROOF KEYNOTES): IN NOTE 6, REFERENCE STRUCTURAL DETAIL 134/S1.4 FOR THE MECHANICAL SCREEN WALL SUPPORT. 19. SHEET A.6; ELEVATION KEYNOTES: NOTE 2 REFERENCES 'MOVEMENT JOINTS'. PROVIDE DETAILS ON THE DRAWINGS FOR JOINTS IN THE VARIOUS WALL MATERIALS. 20. SHEET A.7; DETAIL 3: A PLATFORM SLAB NOTE REFERENCES AN 'ADJUSTABLE FALSE FLOOR'. EXPLAIN THAT REFERENCE, AND ADD A NOTE TO THE DETAIL. 21. SHEET A.7; SECTION B: WHY ARE WALL TYPES INDICATED ON THIS SECTION? 22. SHEET A.8; ENLARGED WASHROOM PLANS: WHERE IS THE BABY CHANGING STATION INDICATED? IT IS REFERENCED ON SHEET A.1 (FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTE 9), BUT NOT INDICATED ON THE PLANS. 23. SHEET A.8; UNISEX ELEVATION 3: THE TOILET PAPER DISPENSER IS DIMENSIONED AS 7" CLEAR FROM THE FRONT OF THE WATER CLOSET. REVISE THAT DIMENSION. 24. SHEET A.9; SECTION 2: PROVIDE THE CONNECTIONS (SIZE AND QUANTITY) OF THE METAL STUD FRAMING AT THE SOFFIT. INCLUDE STUD TO STUD, AND STUD TO STEEL BEAM. 25. SHEET A.9; INTERIOR ELEVATION 2: IS THE SECTION CUT 8/A1.0 CORRECT AT THAT LOCATION? VERIFY. 26. SHEET A.11; ROOF ACCESS HATCH SECTION 5: INDICATE THE SUPPORT FRAMING AROUND THE HATCH AND HOW IT IS CONNECTED TO THE HATCH, OR REFERENCE THE STRUCTURAL (NO ROOF HATCH IS INDICATED ON SHEET S3.0). 27. SHEET S1.0; STRUCTURAL NOTES (FOUNDATIONS): PROVIDE A COPY OF THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR REVIEW. 28. SHEET S3.0; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: SECTION 506 CUT AT THE SOUTH END OF HALL 107 (NEAR THE JANITOR'S CLOSET) SHOULD BE NOTED AS SIMILAR. VERIFY. 29. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 12/05/2014 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Sabino Road Baptist Church - Addition T14CM07897 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 5, 2014 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning has reviewed the building plans and they appear to in compliance with the approved development package. Due to the amount of comments by other PDSD review agencies zoning will not approve at this time. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Once all other PDSD review agencies have approved the plans Zoning will approve. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 12/10/2014 | KEN VAN KARSEN | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | T14CM07897 1. City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code (Ord #10963) compliance: Compare total fixture output to the budget based on property size and zone location (Table 401.1). a. Show compliance with consideration of all existing fixtures within the property lines. The sum of the existing total and proposed shall be within the qualified option limit. b. The rated color temperature of proposed fixtures shall not exceed 3500K, Section 402. Notate plans, or provide manufacturer spec sheet with color temperature rating including the parking area fixtures. The 2012 Outdoor Lighting Code may be found on The City of Tucson Website under: www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd; Codes, Standards, Ordinances & Guidelines; Building Codes. Ken Van Karsen Electrical Plan Review PDSD, City of Tucson 520-837-4906 Kenneth.VanKarsen@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/10/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. An approved development plan is not to be used for construction of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to the building, building sewer, etc.). Provide a site plan showing the installation of the water service to the building and the installation of the building sewer. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 2. Provide a design for the mounting shelf for the water heater along with structural calculations to show that the water heater is safely supported (no design found on the architectural or structural drawings). Reference: Section 301.2, IPC 2012. 3. The water service for the existing buildings uses a 2" pipe but with a new total demand of 98 GPM, the water velocity in the existing pipe may exceed the manufacturer's recommended maximum velocity. Verify that the new water demand will not cause the existing piping to have a water velocity greater than that recommended by the pipe manufacturer. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 4. Verify that the pipe sizes called out for the flush valves will not result in water velocities greater than that recommended by the pipe manufacturer (e.g. limit the water velocity to less than 8 FPS for copper, PEX, or CPVC piping). At a minimum design flow rate of 25 GPM for a siphonic, flush-valve water closet, a 1" Type L copper pipe has a flow velocity of 9.7 FPS. Reference: Table 604.3, IPC 2012. 5. Provide a water pressure regulator conforming to ASSE 1003 or CSA B356 to limit the water pressure to 80 PSI or less. Revise the water pressure calculations to include the effect of the water pressure regulator. Reference: Section 604.8, IPC 2012. 6. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2511.2') is higher than the first floor elevation (2510.10'). Provide backwater valve per Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 7. Provide roof drainage calculations and plans. Provide overflow protection for the roof; include the effect of any vertical walls that can divert rainfall onto the roof. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1108, IPC 2012. |
| 12/10/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Building components labeled as "other" on COMcheck require documentation of the proposed U-factors. Reference: Sections C103.2 and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. 2. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012. |
| 12/10/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 12/12/2014 | CPIERCE1 | WWM | REVIEW | Completed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/18/2014 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |