Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T14CM07775
Parcel: 141113870

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T14CM07775
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/20/2014 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
11/20/2014 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
11/20/2014 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change SHEET SG-1
1. Delete the code reference to the 2010 ADASAD. The governing accessibility code for the City of Tucson is the 2012 IBC Chapter 11 and the 2009 ICC A117.1.
SHEET A-1
2. As per the 2012 IBC, Section 1014.2, Execption 2, doors 3 and 4 are exit access doors and can ot have a lockset. Plase remove the lockset from door schedule.
3. Please reconcil you total building square footage summaries.
4. The exit summaries indicate 2 exits for business and 2 exit for storage which means you have 4 exits for the whole building. Doors 3 and 4 are exit access doors not exit doors.
END OF REVIEW
11/20/2014 RONALD BROWN COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Completed
11/21/2014 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: 9137 E. Camino Abril
T14CM07774 & T14CM07775
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 21, 2014

1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. The development package (DP) plans provided in the building plan are not the approved DP. Either remove the DP sheets from the plan, provide copies of the of the approved DP or make the plans as "FOR REFERENCE ONLY".

3. Once all PDSP agencies have approved the building plans zoning will approve.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956
11/28/2014 DAN SANTA CRUZ ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Plan sheet 'A1'. Space or unit number does not match permit card or permit documents.
2. Plan sheet 'E1'.Interior breaker panel designation not consistent with short cicuit calc's.
.
12/05/2014 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Coordinate the waste and vent diagram, plumbing plan, and the fixture specifications for fixture call-outs. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
2. Revise the plumbing notes to eliminate the notes that do not pertain to this activity. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
3. Provide a specification for the lavatory faucets to demonstrate compliance with Section 416.6, IPC 2012 as amended by the City of Tucson (i.e. 0.25 gallons per cycle).
4. Coordinate the size of the water service pipe with the site plan. The site plan shows a 3/4" meter and reduced pressure backflow preventer that appears to serve all three buildings with a ½" water service pipe but the plumbing plan is based on a 1" meter, a 1-1/4" reduced pressure backflow preventer, and a 1-1/4" water service pipe to just this building. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012 and 603.1, IPC 2012.
5. Correct the arithmetic in the water pressure calculations and determine the required pipe sizes based on accepted engineering practices. Reference; Sections 604.1 and 604.3, IPC 2012.
6. The drawings call for two 2-1/2" vents through the roof but ABS pipe is not available in that size. Reference: Section 702, IPC 2012.
12/05/2014 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Clarify basis of the envelope compliance certificate; the design of the single office (plus one restroom?) does not correspond to the values shown in the COMcheck Envelope Assemblies section. There are two types of "exterior" walls: the metal building wall and the walls that are inside of the un-conditioned warehouse (the wall between the two suites can be ignored because there is no temperature difference from one side to the other). The drawings show no continuous insulation on the walls. The drawings show no projection over the window but a PF-value of 2.0 on COMcheck would correspond to a structure that extends at least 4-feet from the building. Provide NFRC certification of the U-value for the insulated metal door or use the default U-value of 0.60 for an insulated metal door. Reference: Section 303.1 and 303.1.3 and, C402.3.3, IECC 2012.
2. Revise the mechanical compliance certificate to apply to just one suite.
3. Show that each heat pump has a thermostatic control that provides for off-hour and set-back control, automatic shutdown and start-up control and, if the control does not require manual changeover from the heating and cooling modes, restricts set point overlap. Reference: Section C403.2.4, IECC 2012.
4. Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drain. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2012 as amended by the City of Tucson.
5. Provide calculations to show how natural ventilation has been provided. Reference: Section 402.1, IMC 2012.
12/05/2014 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Reqs Change Provide calculations to show the appropriate meter size to serve the water demand for the plumbing fixtures served by this meter. Show the location of the meter and its associated backflow preventer on the site plan. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012 and 603.1, IPC 2012.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/11/2014 FERNE RODRIGUEZ OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed