Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T14CM07612
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/25/2015 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/02/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The contributory area of the breezeway roof drains only onto the eastern portion of the office roof; based on the locations of the crickets, each scupper drains only a specific portion of the roof structure. Hydraulic sizing of the scuppers is not the same as using Table 1106.2 (1), IPC 2012 to determine the size of a downspout. Details 1a/A2 and 2/A2 appear to have conflicting dimensions; clarify where each is used. [Initial comment: Provide roof drainage and hydraulic scupper size calculations based on the 100-year hourly rainfall rate for Tucson, 3" per hour. Include the effect of any vertical walls that can divert rainfall onto the roof. Show all dimensions for the roof scuppers and the downspouts. Reference: Sections 1106.1, 1106.4, and 1108.3, IPC 2012.] 2. Each overflow scupper drains only a specific portion of the roof structure due to the presence of crickets. Clarify how the overflow scuppers protect each roof area. [Initial comment: Provide secondary (overflow) roof drainage. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1108, IPC 2012, and Sections 1611.1 and 1611.3, IBC 2012.] |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/14/2015 | SHANAE POWELL | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 04/14/2015 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |