Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T14CM07567
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/10/2014 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ENG will stamp the building plan approved upon approval of DP14-0189. JG |
| 11/13/2014 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/17/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET A1; FLOOR PLAN: INDICATE THE ENLARGED WALK-IN PLANS (4/A5) ON SHEET A1. 2. SHEET S2 (DETAIL 5); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 78): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE RETAINING WALL AT THE DOCK IS 12" THICK, WHILE THE DETAIL INDICATES 10". CLARIFY. 3. SHEET S4 (SPREAD FOOTING SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 71): COLUMN FOOTINGS 1-B (F2), 1-C (F2), 2-B (F1), 2-C (F1), 3-B (F1), 3-C (F1), 5-B (F1), 5-C (F1), 5-D.1 (F3), 6-B (F2A), AND 6-C (F2A) INDICATE A 1'-3" THICKNESS IN THE FOOTING SCHEDULE, BUT A 1'-6" THICKNESS IN THE CALCULATIONS. CLARIFY. 4. SHEET S4 (SPREAD FOOTING SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 71): COLUMN FOOTING 4-B (F1) INDICATES A 7'-0" X 7'-0 X 1'-3" FOOTING IN THE SCHEDULE, BUT A 8'-0" X 8'-0" X 1'-6" FOOTING IN THE CALCULATIONS. CLARIFY. 5. SHEET S4 (SPREAD FOOTING SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 71): COLUMN FOOTING 4.2-D.1 (F1) INDICATES A 7'-0" X 7'-0" X 1'-3" FOOTING IN THE SCHEDULE, BUT A 5'-0" X 5'-0" X 1'-6" FOOTING IN THE CALCULATIONS. CLARIFY. 6. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; PAGE 2 (WIND LOADS): THE WIND SPEED INDICATES 90 MPH (ULTIMATE). THE CALCULATIONS ON PAGE 5 DO INDICATE A 115 MPH ULTIMATE WIND SPEED, SO CHANGE PAGE 2 TO COORDINATE. 7. GENERAL: THE DATE THAT THE REGISTERED ARCHITECT SEALED THE SUBMITTAL DRAWINGS IS MISSING. PROVIDE. 8. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 11/18/2014 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: T14CM07567 Walmart Neighborhood Store Building Plan Review TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 18, 2014 DUE DATE: December 4, 2014 COMMENTS: 01. Zoning has reviewed the building plans as it pertains to the zoning review purview. While the building plans are in substantial compliance with the preliminary development plans under current review, zoning cannot approve the building plans until the DP is fully approved and all building discipline reviewers have approved the building plans. 02. Zoning will do a follow up review of the building plans on the next submittal and do a comparison of the building plans to the DP once again to ensure consistency as it pertains to the zoning review purview of the building plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. |
| 11/19/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 12/04/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 12/05/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide separate indirect waste pipes for each compartment of the 3-compartment sinks to protect against cross-contamination or fouling. Reference: Sections 801.2 and 802.1.8, IPC 2012. 2. Clarify the entries in the size column of the gas pipe sizing calculations (i.e. if these are the actual pipe sizes, why don't they match the pipe sizes shown on the HVAC pan 1/M1?). |
| 12/05/2014 | KEN VAN KARSEN | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | T14CM07567 1. City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code (Ord #10963) compliance: Compare total fixture output to the budget based on property size and zone location (Table 401.1). a. The rated color temperature of proposed fixtures shall not exceed 3500K, Section 402. Notate plans, or provide manufacturer spec sheet with color temperature rating. b. Update the Exterior Lighting times shown on sheet EM2 in conformance with the 2012 Outdoor Lighting Code Table 501.5. The curfew time is 12:00 A.M. unless business activities continue after this time. If appropriate, state the closing time at a footnote. The 2012 Outdoor Lighting Code may be found on The City of Tucson Website under: www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd; Codes, Standards, Ordinances & Guidelines; Building Codes. Ken Van Karsen Electrical Plan Review PDSD, City of Tucson 520-837-4906 Kenneth.VanKarsen@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/05/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide the water demand calculation for the building along with the size of the proposed water meter. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/16/2015 | AROMERO4 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |