Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

PRO is currently experiencing an outage. Some documents and records may not be available on PRO momentarily. We apologize for the inconvenience and are working to restore full access.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T14CM07391
Parcel: 13216600A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T14CM07391
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/13/2014 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Reprint sheets CNG-2.3, CNG-2.6, CNG-2.6, CNG-2.7, CNG-2.8, CNG-2.9, CNG-2.10, CNG-2.11, and CNG-3.4 so they are legible.
11/13/2014 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Provide the site plan that shows the extension of the CW service pipe and the 8" fire service pipe as note on 1/M-1.1.
11/13/2014 ERIC NEWCOMB COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Approved
11/13/2014 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Completed
11/14/2014 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. SHEET A0.2; CODE NARRATIVE (CHAPTER 5): A STATEMENT IS MADE THAT THE ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA IS 6750 SF PER TABLE 503. REVISE THE ALLOWABLE AREA TO THAT OF THE 2012 IBC.
2. SHEET A0.2; CODE NARRATIVE (CHAPTER 6); CODE REVIEW: THE CODE NARRATIVE INDICATES THE CONSTRUCTION TYPE IS IIA, WHILE THE CODE REVIEW TABLE INDICATES 2B. CLARIFY.
3. SHEET A0.2; CODE NARRATIVE (CHAPTER 7): REFERENCE IS MADE TO SECTIONS 708.1.4 AND 1017.1 FOR SEPARATING WALLS. REVISE THE SECTION NUMBERS TO THE 2012 IBC.
4. SHEET A0.2; CODE NARRATIVE (CHAPTER 10): THERE IS A REFERENCE TO TABLE 1016.1 FOR EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE. REVISE THAT TABLE NUMBER, AND REVISE THE DISTANCE LISTED (300 FEET) TO THE 2012 IBC.
5. SHEET A1.4; CHAIN LINK ELEVATION 5: SECTION 20/A8.0 IS CUT AT THE PIPE BOLLARD AND ALSO AT THE FENCE FOUNDATION. REVISE THE SECTION REFERENCE NUMBERS (NO SECTION 20 ON SHEET A8.0).
6. SHEET A2.0; WALL TYPES: IS THERE A WALL TYPE E3 INDICATED ON THE PLAN? VERIFY.
7. SHEET A2.0 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A4.0 (SECTION 1): SECTION 1/A4.0 IS CUT THROUGH THE ENTIRE BUILDING (GRIDS 1 THROUGH 4) ON THE PLAN, BUT SHEET A4.0 SHOWS THE SECTION CUT ONLY THROUGH A PORTION OF THE BUILDING. THEN SECTION 2/A4.0 1S CUT THROUGH THE REMAINDER OF THE BUILDING. CLARIFY.
8. SHEET A2.0 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A4.0 (SECTION 2): REVERSE THE DIRECTION OF THE SECTION CUT ON THE FLOOR PLAN.
9. SHEET A2.0 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A4.1 (SECTION 2): SECTION 2/A4.1 IS CUT OUTSIDE THE BUILDING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER. IS THIS CORRECT AT THAT LOCATION?
10. SHEET A2.0 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A4.1 (SECTION 4): THE TITLE OF SECTION 4 SHOULD BE NORTH WALL SECTION. VERIFY.
11. SHEET A2.0; FLOOR PLAN: THERE ARE SEVERAL SECTIONS (NORTH WALL OF SCADA ROOM, COMPRESSOR EQUIPMENT PAD, CNG PIPE RACK) THAT ARE NOT COMPLETE. REVISE.
12. SHEET A2.2; ROOF PLAN: AT THE EAST WALL, A SECTION 2/A2.2 IS CUT. HOWEVER, SECTION 2 INDICATES 'NOT USED'. CLARIFY.
13. SHEET A2.2; ROOF PLAN: A SECTION 13/A2.2 IS CUT AT A COMPRESSOR OPENING, BUT THE SECTION TITLE INDICATES 'EXHAUST FAN FLASHING'. CLARIFY.
14. SHEET A2.2; ROOF PLAN 1: ON THE NORTH END OF THE BUILDING, A NOTE INDICATES 'EXHAUST FANS-SEE MECH.'. REVISE THE NOTE TO REFERENCE THE ACCESS LADDER.
15. SHEET A3.0; EAST ELEVATION 1: A SECTION CUT ON GRID D AND A SECTION CUT BETWEEN GRIDS B AND C ARE NOT COMPLETE. REVISE.
16. SHEET A3.0; EAST ELEVATION 1: SECTION 20/A8.0 IS CUT NEAR GRID C. REVISE THE SECTION REFERENCE NUMBER (NO SECTION 20 ON A8.0).
17. SHEET A4.0; EAST WALL SECTION 1: AT THE TOP OF THE WALL, A SECTION 2/A2.2 IS INDICATED. HOWEVER, SECTION 2 INDICATES 'NOT USED'. CLARIFY.
18. SHEET A4.0; EAST WALL SECTION 1: AT THE SOFFIT, A SECTION 12/A2.2 IS INDICATED. HOWEVER, SECTION 12 INDICATES 'NOT USED'. CLARIFY.
19. SHEET A4.1; SOUTH WALL SECTION 2: AT THE 8'-0" WALL HEIGHT, A SECTION 12/A2.2 IS INDICATED. HOWEVER, SECTION 12 INDICATES 'NOT USED'. CLARIFY.
20. SHEET S-1.4 (LEDGER SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 55): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A LEDGER SIZE OF MC10X6.5, WHILE THE SCHEDULE INDICATES AN ANGLE 6X3 1/2X5/16 (OR 1/4" BENT PLATE). CLARIFY.
21. SHEET S-2.0 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 24): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE ROOF JOISTS AT 6'-0" O.C. (ALTHOUGH 7' SPACING WAS USED FOR THE LOADING), WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES A MAXIMUM 7'-0" O.C. CLARIFY.
22. SHEET S-2.0 (PLAN KEYNOTES NUMBER 4); SHEET S-3.0 (DETAILS 108, 109, AND 110): THE DETAILS INDICATE THE EQUIPMENT PAD HAS #4 AT 12" O.C. EACH WAY TOP AND BOTTOM (NOTE 4), WHILE KEYNOTE 4 ON THE PLANS INDICATES #5 AT 12" O.C. EACH WAY TOP AND BOTTOM. CLARIFY.
23. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
11/14/2014 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Denied Zoning cannot approve the building plans until DP has been approved and all building plans reviewers have approved the building plan package.
11/17/2014 KEN VAN KARSEN ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change T14CM07391 Natural Gas Plant

1. Show the Plumbing and Mechanical clear zone notation appearing on plan #2/E2 onto sheet M-1.1.

2. Clarify the capacity of Panel G shown at the panel schedule and keynote #10/E3.

3. Clarify the location of keynote #9/E4.

4. Verify AIC rating of new panels is consistent with available fault current.

Ken Van Karsen
Elect Plan Review
PDSD, City of Tucson
520-837-4912
Kenneth.VanKarsen@tucsonaz.gov
11/19/2014 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Approved Spoke to Designer about the requirements in the 2012 IFC. He will resubmit plans and I will start review process following the resubmittal.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/09/2014 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed