Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T14CM07391
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/13/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Reprint sheets CNG-2.3, CNG-2.6, CNG-2.6, CNG-2.7, CNG-2.8, CNG-2.9, CNG-2.10, CNG-2.11, and CNG-3.4 so they are legible. |
| 11/13/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide the site plan that shows the extension of the CW service pipe and the 8" fire service pipe as note on 1/M-1.1. |
| 11/13/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 11/13/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 11/14/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET A0.2; CODE NARRATIVE (CHAPTER 5): A STATEMENT IS MADE THAT THE ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA IS 6750 SF PER TABLE 503. REVISE THE ALLOWABLE AREA TO THAT OF THE 2012 IBC. 2. SHEET A0.2; CODE NARRATIVE (CHAPTER 6); CODE REVIEW: THE CODE NARRATIVE INDICATES THE CONSTRUCTION TYPE IS IIA, WHILE THE CODE REVIEW TABLE INDICATES 2B. CLARIFY. 3. SHEET A0.2; CODE NARRATIVE (CHAPTER 7): REFERENCE IS MADE TO SECTIONS 708.1.4 AND 1017.1 FOR SEPARATING WALLS. REVISE THE SECTION NUMBERS TO THE 2012 IBC. 4. SHEET A0.2; CODE NARRATIVE (CHAPTER 10): THERE IS A REFERENCE TO TABLE 1016.1 FOR EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE. REVISE THAT TABLE NUMBER, AND REVISE THE DISTANCE LISTED (300 FEET) TO THE 2012 IBC. 5. SHEET A1.4; CHAIN LINK ELEVATION 5: SECTION 20/A8.0 IS CUT AT THE PIPE BOLLARD AND ALSO AT THE FENCE FOUNDATION. REVISE THE SECTION REFERENCE NUMBERS (NO SECTION 20 ON SHEET A8.0). 6. SHEET A2.0; WALL TYPES: IS THERE A WALL TYPE E3 INDICATED ON THE PLAN? VERIFY. 7. SHEET A2.0 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A4.0 (SECTION 1): SECTION 1/A4.0 IS CUT THROUGH THE ENTIRE BUILDING (GRIDS 1 THROUGH 4) ON THE PLAN, BUT SHEET A4.0 SHOWS THE SECTION CUT ONLY THROUGH A PORTION OF THE BUILDING. THEN SECTION 2/A4.0 1S CUT THROUGH THE REMAINDER OF THE BUILDING. CLARIFY. 8. SHEET A2.0 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A4.0 (SECTION 2): REVERSE THE DIRECTION OF THE SECTION CUT ON THE FLOOR PLAN. 9. SHEET A2.0 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A4.1 (SECTION 2): SECTION 2/A4.1 IS CUT OUTSIDE THE BUILDING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER. IS THIS CORRECT AT THAT LOCATION? 10. SHEET A2.0 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A4.1 (SECTION 4): THE TITLE OF SECTION 4 SHOULD BE NORTH WALL SECTION. VERIFY. 11. SHEET A2.0; FLOOR PLAN: THERE ARE SEVERAL SECTIONS (NORTH WALL OF SCADA ROOM, COMPRESSOR EQUIPMENT PAD, CNG PIPE RACK) THAT ARE NOT COMPLETE. REVISE. 12. SHEET A2.2; ROOF PLAN: AT THE EAST WALL, A SECTION 2/A2.2 IS CUT. HOWEVER, SECTION 2 INDICATES 'NOT USED'. CLARIFY. 13. SHEET A2.2; ROOF PLAN: A SECTION 13/A2.2 IS CUT AT A COMPRESSOR OPENING, BUT THE SECTION TITLE INDICATES 'EXHAUST FAN FLASHING'. CLARIFY. 14. SHEET A2.2; ROOF PLAN 1: ON THE NORTH END OF THE BUILDING, A NOTE INDICATES 'EXHAUST FANS-SEE MECH.'. REVISE THE NOTE TO REFERENCE THE ACCESS LADDER. 15. SHEET A3.0; EAST ELEVATION 1: A SECTION CUT ON GRID D AND A SECTION CUT BETWEEN GRIDS B AND C ARE NOT COMPLETE. REVISE. 16. SHEET A3.0; EAST ELEVATION 1: SECTION 20/A8.0 IS CUT NEAR GRID C. REVISE THE SECTION REFERENCE NUMBER (NO SECTION 20 ON A8.0). 17. SHEET A4.0; EAST WALL SECTION 1: AT THE TOP OF THE WALL, A SECTION 2/A2.2 IS INDICATED. HOWEVER, SECTION 2 INDICATES 'NOT USED'. CLARIFY. 18. SHEET A4.0; EAST WALL SECTION 1: AT THE SOFFIT, A SECTION 12/A2.2 IS INDICATED. HOWEVER, SECTION 12 INDICATES 'NOT USED'. CLARIFY. 19. SHEET A4.1; SOUTH WALL SECTION 2: AT THE 8'-0" WALL HEIGHT, A SECTION 12/A2.2 IS INDICATED. HOWEVER, SECTION 12 INDICATES 'NOT USED'. CLARIFY. 20. SHEET S-1.4 (LEDGER SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 55): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A LEDGER SIZE OF MC10X6.5, WHILE THE SCHEDULE INDICATES AN ANGLE 6X3 1/2X5/16 (OR 1/4" BENT PLATE). CLARIFY. 21. SHEET S-2.0 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 24): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE ROOF JOISTS AT 6'-0" O.C. (ALTHOUGH 7' SPACING WAS USED FOR THE LOADING), WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES A MAXIMUM 7'-0" O.C. CLARIFY. 22. SHEET S-2.0 (PLAN KEYNOTES NUMBER 4); SHEET S-3.0 (DETAILS 108, 109, AND 110): THE DETAILS INDICATE THE EQUIPMENT PAD HAS #4 AT 12" O.C. EACH WAY TOP AND BOTTOM (NOTE 4), WHILE KEYNOTE 4 ON THE PLANS INDICATES #5 AT 12" O.C. EACH WAY TOP AND BOTTOM. CLARIFY. 23. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 11/14/2014 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning cannot approve the building plans until DP has been approved and all building plans reviewers have approved the building plan package. |
| 11/17/2014 | KEN VAN KARSEN | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | T14CM07391 Natural Gas Plant 1. Show the Plumbing and Mechanical clear zone notation appearing on plan #2/E2 onto sheet M-1.1. 2. Clarify the capacity of Panel G shown at the panel schedule and keynote #10/E3. 3. Clarify the location of keynote #9/E4. 4. Verify AIC rating of new panels is consistent with available fault current. Ken Van Karsen Elect Plan Review PDSD, City of Tucson 520-837-4912 Kenneth.VanKarsen@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/19/2014 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | Spoke to Designer about the requirements in the 2012 IFC. He will resubmit plans and I will start review process following the resubmittal. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/09/2014 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |