Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T14CM07304
Parcel: 117130420

Address:
101 S STONE AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL

Permit Number - T14CM07304
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/02/2015 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. A revised COMcheck Envelope Compliance Certificate was not included in this submittal and the U-values and SHGF values for the fenestration still require either the NFRC certification numbers or the test report from an approved 3rd party testing lab that validates the U-values and SHGF values for the fenestration components. [Initial comment: Show that all of the new fenestration components comply with the 2012 IECC, i.e. Supply the NFRC certification numbers for the fenestration components or use the default values in Tables C303.1.3 (1), C303.1.3 (2) and C303.1.3.(3), IECC 2012 in the envelope COMcheck analysis. Reference: Section C303.1.3, IECC 2012.]
2. Clarify the reason why the proposed condensing systems have significantly higher capacities than the calculated cooling loads (CU-1 serves a load of 157.9 MBH but has a capacity of 240 MBH; CU-2 serves a load of 186.3 MBH but has a capacity of 283 MBH; CU-3 serves a load of 90.5 MBH but has a capacity of 184 MBH; and CU-4 serves a load of 60.4 MBH but has a capacity of 114 MBH). How was the cooling and heating of the ventilation air by MAU-1 factored in to the cooling and heating loads? [Initial comment: Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference: Sections C403.2.1, C403.2.2, and R403.6, IECC 2012.]
3. Neither condensate nor the discharge from an elevator sump pump may terminate into the storm drain. Contact Estevan Tineo at 791-4251 for guidance. [Initial comment: Show the routing, and termination of the condensate drain for DAC-1, located in the elevator equipment room. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2012 as amended by the City of Tucson.]
4. Show how the 5" diameter exhaust ducts are able to comply with the exception to Section 717.6.1, IBC 2012. Show how the annular space around the penetration of the horizontal fire-rated assembly by the 4" exhaust ducts is protected (Section 717.6.1, exception (4), IBC 2012. [Initial comment: Provide details to show how the mechanical penetrations of the vertical and horizontal fire assemblies will be constructed so as to not affect the fire protection requirements. Reference: Sections 603.1 and 607.1, IMC 2012.]
5. Show how the direct-vent flues are to penetrate the horizontal fire-rated assemblies in accordance with Section 717, IBC 2012.
01/05/2015 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Revise the gas floor plan on sheet P3.1 to show the branch serving the dryers in the correct location revise the gas diagram on sheet P2.4 also. [Initial comment: Revise the label for the gas pipe running between level 1.0 and level 2.0: it is mislabeled on the level 1.0 diagram as 2" but is correctly labeled on all other locations.]
2. The discharge from an elevator sump pump may not terminate into a storm drain. Contact Estevan Tineo at 791-4251 for guidance. [Initial comment: Verify that the Stormwater Management Section of the Tucson Department of Transportation will not allow water from an elevator sump to be discharged into the gutter and ultimately the stormwater collection system. Reference: Section 701.5, IPC 2012; Contact the Stormwater Management Section at 520-791-4371 for further information.]
3. Label the pipe sizes on the waste and vent isometric (B/P1.4) for the stack serving the automatic clothes washers and add a cleanout to the base of the stack. [Initial comment: The fixture drain serving an automatic clothes washer shall connect to a fixture branch that is at least 3 inches in diameter. Reference: Section 406.2, IPC 2012.]
01/07/2015 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Reqs Change Based on the horizontal assembly exception used, the sprinkler system must be a full NFPA 13 system, cannot be a 13R. Please add this clarification to the fire sprinkler notes on sheet T1.0.
01/07/2015 KEN VAN KARSEN ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change T14CM07304

Lighting floor plans:
a. Provide emergency powered lighting at both interior and exterior for all exit discharge doorways, IBC 1006.3.5. Show existing exterior lighting at discharge doors with backup power or show fixtures in compliance.

All corrections and updates are subject to additional review comments for code compliance.

Ken Van Karsen
Electrical Plan Review
PDSD, City of Tucson
520-837-4906
Kenneth.VanKarsen@tucsonaz.gov
01/08/2015 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change Submit the plans for the final approval and DRB approval stamp for this permit T14CM07304 on the final drawings.
12/19/2014 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change SHEET T1.0
1. Building Occupancy
a. Why 3 - 3rd floor calculations
b. Why the separation of Total and Total Renovated
c. Don't understand, please clarify
2. Please define and explain what type of sprinkler system is to be installed in the project: 13, 13R or 13D?
SHEET A0.2
3. There are no accessible exits provided for the third floor. Please research the 2012 IBC Chapter 11, Section 1107.6.2, Chapter 34, Section 3411 and any other related code sections and explain how the 3rd level does not have to be accessible.
SHEET A0.3
4. The basement requires two exits.
a. Exiting through storage rooms, electrical and mechanical rooms is not code compliant.
b. No exits are provided for storage rooms 6, 7, 9 and Hall 11.
c. Please define the exit path to the public right way. Clarify what is happening in the outdoor open space between the two buildings. Show slopes, percentages, finishes, fences and gates and code compliance.
SHEET A2.1
5. Provide a gate at stair 111 so people will not exit down to the basement in emergency situations.
6. The existing stairs to the second level is now an hour rated shaft. Nothing is being shown about how the floor framing system supporting this shaft is to be protected.
SHEET A10.1
7. At detail 2 show the landing enclosures and rated doors.
GENERAL
8. Clarify all exits and coordinate with your electrical engineer the exit sign placements accordingly.
END OF REVIEW

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
01/12/2015 SHANAE POWELL OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
01/12/2015 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed