Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T14CM07057
Parcel: 141113850

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T14CM07057
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/21/2014 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Approved
10/21/2014 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Approved
10/27/2014 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. SHEET SG-1; TITLE: THE SHEET TITLE INDICATES '4-WAREHOUSE AND OFFICE UNITS'. ARE THERE ACTUALLY FOUR SEPARATE UNITS? EXPLAIN.
2. SHEET SG-1; CODE ANALYSIS DATA (GENERAL BUILDING SUMMARY): IN THIS TABLE, THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION IS LISTED AS V-N. IN THE 'LEGAL' BOX ON THIS SAME SHEET, TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION IS LISTED AS 2B. CLARIFY.
3. SHEET SG-1; 'LEGAL' BOX: THE ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA IS LISTED AS 12,000 SF PER THE IBC SECTION 903.2.3. REVISE THE REFERENCE TO THE IBC TABLE 503, AND A MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA OF 17,500 SF (S-1 OCCUPANCY) + AREA INCREASES, AND A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 55'. REVISE.
4. SHEET SG-1; GENERAL BUILDING SUMMARY: THE ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA LISTED IS 8500 SF FOR THE S-1 OCCUPANCY, AND 9000 SF FOR THE B OCCUPANCY. TABLE 503 LISTS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWAGLE FLOOR AREA OF 23,000 SF FOR THE B OCCUPANCY (+ AREA INCREASES), AND 17,500 SF FOR THE S-1 OCCUPANCY (+ AREA INCREASES). REVISE.
5. SHEET A-1; OCCUPANCY LOAD AND EXIT CALCULATIONS BOX: THE TOTAL BUILDING AREAS ARE LISTED AS 6000 SF FOR THE S-1 OCCUPANCY, AND 1200 SF FOR THE B OCCUPANCY. EXPLAIN.
6. SHEET A-1; MINIMUM PLUMBING FIXTURES REQUIRED BOX AND OCCUPANCY LOAD AND EXIT CALCULATIONS: INDICATE ON THE DRAWINGS THAT EACH LEASE SPACE (1200 SF) HAS 915 SF OF S-1 AND 285 SF OF B, FIVE TOTAL OCCUPANTS, ONE EXIT REQUIRED (ONE PROVIDED), ONE UNISEX RESTROOM REQUIRED (ONE PROVIDED), AND NO DRINKING FOUNTAINS OR MOP SINKS REQUIRED.
7. SHEET A-2; TOILET ROOM ACCESSORIES: FINISH THE DETAIL REFERENCE IN NOTE E.
8. SHEET A-3; ELEVATION KEY NOTES: NOTES 15 AND 16 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE ELEVATIONS. VERIFY.
9. SHEET A-4; SECTION KEY NOTES: NOTES 1, 3, 5, 10, 11, 14, AND 15 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE SECTIONS. VERIFY.
10. SHEET A-4; DETAIL 1: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE VERBIAGE.
11. SHEET S-1; FOUNDATION KEY NOTES: THE ONLY KEY NOTE LOCATED ON THE PLAN WAS 2. VERIFY.
12. SHEET S-1; HAIRPIN REBAR SCHEDULE: THE ONLY HAIRPIN LOCATED ON THE PLAN WAS 1. VERIFY.
13. SHEET S-1: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE SECTIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND SCHEDULE VERBIAGE.
14. SHEET S-1; FOUNDATION PLAN: ON THE WEST WALL, THERE APPEARS TO BE A PIER CAP OR FOUNDATION ON THE PLAN. CLARIFY.
15. SHEET S-2; FRAMING PLAN: NO CALCULATIONS WERE LOCATED FOR THE INTERIOR CEILING JOISTS, HEADERS, AND WALLS. VERIFY. IS THE 4" SLAB SUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT THE WALL LOADS? VERIFY.
16. SHEET S-2; FRAMING PLAN: SECTION 4/S-2 IS CUT AT GRID LINE 2, BUT THERE IS NO SECTION 4/S-2 SHOWN. VERIFY.
17. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: IS THERE A FLAGPOLE NOT SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS (PER CALCULATION SHEET 10)? VERIFY.
18. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
10/30/2014 LEERAY HANLY ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
11/03/2014 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Coordinate the size of the water service pipe with the site plan. The site plan shows a 1-1/2" service but the plumbing plan shows a 1-1/4" water service pipe. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
2. Coordinate the waste and vent diagram, plumbing plan, and the fixture specifications for both pipe sizes and fixture call-outs. (Note: Any fitting or connection in a drainage system that results in a reduction of the pipe area is prohibited.) Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012 and Section 706.2, IPC 2012.
3. Revise the plumbing notes to eliminate the notes that do not pertain to this activity. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
4. Provide a specification for the lavatory faucets to demonstrate compliance with Section 416.6, IPC 2012 as amended by the City of Tucson.
5. The drawings call for two 2-1/2" vents through the roof but ABS pipe is not available in that size. Reference: Section 702, IPC 2012.
11/03/2014 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Clarify basis of the envelope compliance certificate; the design of the single office (plus one restroom?) does not correspond to the values shown in the COMcheck Envelope Assemblies section. There are two types of "exterior" walls: the metal building wall and the walls that are inside of the un-conditioned warehouse (the wall between the two suites can be ignored because there is no temperature difference from one side to the other). The drawings show no continuous insulation on the walls. The drawings show no projection over the window but a PF-value of 2.0 on COMcheck would correspond to a structure that extends at least 4-feet from the building. Provide NFRC certification of the U-value for the insulated metal door or use the default U-value of 0.60 for an insulated metal door. Reference: Section 303.1 and 303.1.3 and, C402.3.3, IECC 2012.
2. Revise the mechanical compliance certificate and the interior lighting and power compliance certificate to apply to just one suite.
3. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012.
4. Show that each heat pump has a thermostatic control that provides for off-hour and set-back control, automatic shutdown and start-up control and, if the control does not require manual changeover from the heating and cooling modes, restricts set point overlap. Reference: Section C403.2.4, IECC 2012.
5. Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drain. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2012 as amended by the City of Tucson.
6. Provide calculations to show how natural ventilation has been provided. Reference: Section 402.1, IMC 2012.
11/03/2014 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Reqs Change Clarify the size of water meter that will be used to supply the building. The site plan shows an existing ¾" meter but the water pressure calculations are based on installing a 1" water meter.