Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T14CM07048
Parcel: 14102013D

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T14CM07048
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/21/2014 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change PREVIOUS COMMENT 9
SHEET 3a1.0
1. Provide a large scale detail of the new ramp showing all accessible requirements including grade differences, dimensioning, slope, handrails in plan and elevation and landings.
a. Reference the large scale detail from detail 1/3a1.0.
PREVIOUS COMMENT 13
SHEET 3a6.0
2. Note 7.15 is pointing at the new steel bond beam which references the roof system. Provide another note referencing the steel bond beam to detail 3/a9.3.
a. At details 1 and 2/3a6.1, shouldn't the bond beam be shown on these two building sections?
PREVIOUIS COMMENT 16
3. In the structural engineer's separate letter, he indicates the certification is attached to this submittal. It is not to be found.
END OF REVIEW
11/24/2014 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change Final approval of DP14-0177 is required.
12/09/2014 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Show the R-values for the cavity insulation layers on the building sections or details. [Initial comment: Revise the energy code analysis for the building envelope, coordinating the roof insulation used in the analysis with those shown on the drawing. No R-values for cavity insulation or continuous insulation layers were shown on the building sections or details. The lower roof is called out as "built up roofing system over wood roof deck" with no continuous insulation. Reference: Section C303.1, IECC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.]
12/09/2014 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Provide separate indirect waste pipes for each compartment of the 3-compartment sink to protect against cross-contamination or fouling. Reference: Sections 801.2 and 802.1.8, IPC 2012. [Initial comment: Provide a complete plumbing plan; including waste, vent and water supply isometrics for the work that will be done in the kitchen (called "storage" in the architectural floor plan) as part of this activity. Similarly, clarify the extent of the work that will be done in the Usher Prep room (aka "snack bar"). Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.]
2. The drinking fountain, P-6, is mislabeled in the water isometric (3/3p2.1) as P-5. [Initial comment: Provide a water supply isometric for the snack bar. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.]

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/16/2014 SHANAE POWELL OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
12/16/2014 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed