Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T14CM07048
Parcel: 14102013D

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T14CM07048
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/23/2014 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change G2.0
1. Please show both free standing canopies on this plan and provide dimensions showing separation from buildings.
2. Provide the square footage for all canopies and covered patios. Summarize them separately for each building.
G2.1
2. The occupancy classification for this project is to be a mixed occupancy of A3, assembly for worship and E educational as required by section 305.1.1. Please revise your building code summaries accordingly.
3. Why are buildings 3 and 4 sprinklered and building 2 is not sprinklered?
SHEET X1.1
4. At detail 2, reference comment 1 above.
SHEET 2a1.0
5. Door 206 is non compliant with ICC A117.1, Section 404.2.3.2 (b).
a. Please provide a hardware schedule.
SHEET 2a2.0
6. Please show building four and it's relation to the canopy.
Provide dimensions showing the space between the buildings and the canopy.
SHERET 2a4.0
7. Reference comment 5 above.
8. At note 22.6: add a reference to detail 1/g1.1 for required spout heights.
SHEET 3a1.0
9. The stage area is not accessible.
10. Door 309 is non compliant with ICC A117.1, Section 404.2.3.2 (b).
11. Show a reference from the two toilet rooms to the large scale toilet room plan.
12. The control booth is not accessible.
SHEET 3a6.0
13. At detail 2 please explain the RCMU top course closure.
SHEET 3a7.0
14. Reference comment 10 above.
SHEET 3a7.1
15. Provide a 2'-0" dimension from the floor to the top of the counter.
SHEETS s1.01 and s1.02
16. Provide certification for the special inspectors required for the inspections outlined on these two sheets.
SHEET S1.07
17. Correct the lintel schedule to read LT11 and LT12 in lieu of 3 LT10s.
SHEET 3s2.1
18. On calc sheet 106, can not find 3R11 4x4x1/4 cantilever on Roof Framing Key Plan. Roof Framing plan and key plan shows a 5x5x1/4 cantilever.
19. Calcs page 109 calls for an HSS 8x4x1/4 at buillding B canopy. Can not find the beam on he key plan nor lower roof plan on this sheet.
SHEET 2p1.0
20. Provide structural calculations and structural details of the water heater wall mounting bracket and show wall analization calculations.
SHEETS x1.0, x1.1, x2.0, 4s2.1 plus structural details and 0e1.0
21. If the Baptismal is not to be constructed in Phase 1 of this project then remove all references on these sheets.
a. If hoever, it is meant to be part of the construction of phase 1, then please obtain a forth construction permit application and add the plumbing sheets for the baptismal construction.
b. Better check all drawings for the proper location of the baptismal. Sheets x1.0 and 0e.1.0 show the location considerably North than other sheets.
END OF REVEIW
10/29/2014 LEERAY HANLY ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
10/31/2014 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Completed
10/31/2014 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
10/31/2014 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Revise the energy code analysis for the building envelope, coordinating the roof insulation used in the analysis with those shown on the drawing. No R-values for cavity insulation or continuous insulation layers were shown on the building sections or details. The lower roof is called out as "built up roofing system over wood roof deck" with no continuous insulation. Reference: Section C303.1, IECC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
2. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012.
11/03/2014 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change Approval of DP14-0177 required.
11/03/2014 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Provide a complete plumbing plan, including waste, vent and water supply isometrics for the work that will be done in the kitchen (called "storage" in the architectural floor plan) as part of this activity. Similarly, clarify the extent of the work that will be done in the Usher Prep room (aka "snack bar"). Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
2. Provide a water supply isometric for the snack bar. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
3. Show how the water pipes for the two exterior sinks are to be protected from freezing. Reference: Section 305.4, IPC 2012.
4. Provide a detail of the water heater installation, including the excess pressure relief, expansion tank, safety pan, and valves. Reference: Sections 503, 504, 606.1, 607.2, and 607.3, IPC 2012.
5. Verify that the pipe sizes called out for the flush valves will not result in water velocities greater than that recommended by the pipe manufacturer (e.g. limit the water velocity to less than 8 FPS for copper). At a minimum design flow rate of 25 GPM for a siphonic, flush-valve water closet, a 1" Type L copper pipe has a flow velocity of 9.7 FPS. Reference: Table 604.3, IPC 2012. (See also Sections 610.1 and 610.12, UPC 2006 since you are using the 2006 UPC as a method for sizing the water distribution piping.)
6. The water pressure calculations use 80 PSI as a design pressure but note #2 of the calculations indicates that a pressure reducer set to 70 PSI will be installed. Use the lower pressure as the design basis. Reference: Section 610.7 (5), UPC 2006.
7. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2908.97') is less than 12" below the first floor elevation (2909.50'). Provide a backwater valve per Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. Floors discharging from above that reference point shall not discharge through the backwater valve.
8. The lift station calculations and drawings (P6.0) are to be reviewed by the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality as part of the private sewer collection system. This will be a separate activity, not a part of the building construction
11/03/2014 ELIZABETH LEIBOLD ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/18/2014 AROMERO4 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed