Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T14CM07018
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/20/2014 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | THIS PROJECT NEEDS APPROVAL FROM THE STATE FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE AS IT IS A CHARTER SCHOOL |
| 10/23/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET COVER (INDEX TO SHEETS); SHEET S.3: THE SHEET INDEX INDICATES THIS SHEET IS A ROOF PARTIAL FRAMING PLAN, WHILE SHEET S.3 INDICATES THE SECOND LEVEL FRAMING PLAN. CLARIFY. 2. SHEET COVER (INDEX TO SHEETS); SHEET S.4: THE SHEET INDEX INDICATES THIS SHEET IS SECTIONS, WHILE SHEET S.4 INDICATES THE PARTIAL ROOF FRAMING PLAN. CLARIFY. 3. SHEET COVER (INDEX TO SHEETS); SHEET S.5: THE SHEET INDEX INDICATES THIS SHEET IS COURTYARD WALLS, WHILE SHEET S.5 INDICATES SECTIONS. CLARIFY. 4. SHEET COVER (INDEX TO SHEETS); SHEET S.7: THE SHEET INDEX INDICATES THIS SHEET IS STRUCTURAL NOTES, WHILE SHEET S.7 INDICATES DETAILS. CLARIFY. 5. SHEET COVER (INDEX TO SHEETS); SHEET S.8: THE SHEET INDEX INDICATES THIS SHEET IS A ROOF FRAMING PLAN, WHILE SHEET S.8 INDICATES STRUCTURAL NOTES. CLARIFY. 6. SHEET A-1; CODE ANALYSIS (STAGE CONSTRUCTION): THE FIRST PARAGRAPH INDICATES A FIRE-RESISTANCE-RATED FLOOR IS NOT REQUIRED, PROVIDED THE SPACE BELOW THE STAGE IS EQUIPPED WITH AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM OR FIRE-EXTINGUISHING SYSTEM. PROVIDE A STATEMENT OF THE CONDITION TO BE USED FOR THIS PROJECT. 7. SHEET A-1; CODE ANALYSIS (STAGE CONSTRUCTION): CONCERNING SECTION 410.4 FOR PLATFORM CONSTRUCTION, PROVIDE A STATEMENT INDICATING WHETHER FIRE-RETARDENT-TREATED WOOD WILL BE USED FOR THE STAGE CONSTRUCTION. 8. SHEET A-1; CODE ANALYSIS (EXIT DISCHARGE SIZING): THE BASKETBALL COURT ON THE EXITING PLAN INDICATES 450 OCCUPANTS (200 + 125 + 125), WHILE THE EXIT DISCHARGE SIZING INDICATES 400 OCCUPANTS. CLARIFY. 9. SHEET A-1; CODE ANALYSIS (EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE): THE CODE ANALYSIS INDICATES 236' EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE FROM THE STAGE. WHERE DOES THIS DISTANCE SHOW UP ON THE EXITING PLAN? VERIFY. 10. SHEET A-1; CODE ANALYSIS (MINIMUM AISLE WIDTH): NOTE NUMBER 1 INDICATES MAXIMUM SEATING PER AISLES HAVING SEATING ON BOTH SIDES OF A 36" AISLE IS 21. WHERE IS THIS STATED? 11. SHEET A-1; CODE ANALYSIS (ACCESSIBILITY): REFERENCE IS MADE TO SECTION 1108.2.3 FOR COMPANION SEATING. ADD VERBIAGE TO THIS NOTE THAT ONE COMPANION SEAT IS PROVIDED AT EACH WHEELCHAIR SPACE. 12. SHEET A-3; MASTER PLAN: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE DIMENSIONS AND VERBIAGE. 13. SHEET A-3; MASTER PLAN: THERE ARE SECTION CUTS 'A' AND 'B' INDICATED. WHERE ARE THESE SECTIONS LOCATED IN THE PLANS? 14. SHEETS A-3, A-4, AND A-5; COURTYARD ELEVATIONS F AND H: THESE ELEVATIONS SHOULD BE REVERSED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 15. SHEET A-3A; DEMOLITION PLAN AND ROOF PLAN: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE DIMENSIONS AND VERBIAGE. 16. SHEET A-3A; ROOF PLAN: AT THE EAST AND WEST COURTYARDS, SECTIONS 1/A-9 AND 2/A-9 ARE CUT. WHERE ARE THESE SECTIONS LOCATED IN THE PLANS? 17. SHEET A-3A; ROOF PLAN: AT THE SMOKE VENTS, SECTION 3/A-9 IS CUT. REVISE THE SECTION CUT SHEET NUMBER. 18. SHEET A-3A; DEMOLITION NOTES: IN NOTE 5, REVISE THE ROW REFERENCE EC TO BC. 19. SHEET A-3A; DEMOLITION NOTES: NOTE 6 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 20. SHEET A-3A; DEMOLITION NOTES: NOTE 10 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 21. SHEET A-3A; NOTES: NOTE 17 REFERENCES DETAILS 1 AND 2 ON SHEET A-10 FOR CRICKETS. ARE THE DETAIL REFERENCES CORRECT? VERIFY. 22. SHEET A-3A; NOTES: NOTES 20, 21, AND 22 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 23. SHEET A-3A; NOTES (NOTE 22): PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND DETAILS ON THE DRAWINGS OF GUARDRAILS REQUIRED BY THE IBC. 24. SHEET A-4 AND A-5; PLAN: ON SECTION CUTS A-A, B-B, C-C, D-D, AND E-E, PROVIDE THE SHEET NUMBER. 25. SHEETS A-4 AND A-5; PLAN: THE SECTION B-B CUT THROUGH THE STAGE SHOULD BE A-A. VERIFY. 26. SHEET A-5 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A-6 (SERVICE ROOM PLAN): DOOR 13A IS SHOWN SWINGING IN DIFFERENT DIRECTIONS ON THESE PLANS. CLARIFY. 27. SHEET A-6; SHIP'S LADDER SECTION 5: COMPLETE THE SECTION WITH THE DIMENSION FOR THE EXACT HEIGHT FROM FLOOR TO TOP OF MEZZANINE (BOXED NOTE). 28. SHEET A-6; PLAN KEYNOTES: IS NOTE 5 AS INDICATED AT THE EXIT NORTH OF GRID E AND EAST OF GRID 5 CORRECT? VERIFY. 29. SHEET A-6A; SEATING CHART PLAN: INDICATE ON THIS PLAN THE SEVEN WHEELCHAIR SPACES AND COMPANION SPACES. 30. SHEET A-7; SECTION C-C: INDICATE GRID E ON THE SECTION. 31. SHEET A-7; SECTIONS KEYNOTES (NOTES 25 AND 60): PROVIDE THE HANDRAIL INFORMATION REQUIRED BY THE IBC ON THE DRAWINGS. 32. SHEET A-8; NOTES: NOTE 12 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLANS. VERIFY. 33. SHEET A-8; NOTES: NOTE 15 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLANS. VERIFY. 34. SHEET A-8; NOTES: DELETE NOTE 19 (SAME AS 11). 35. SHEET S.1; FOUNDATION SCHEDULE: FOOTING F4 INDICATES A 1'-4" X 6'-0" FOOTING. AT BOTH COURTYARDS, A FOOTING F4 IS INDICATED ON ALL SIDES. IS THIS A CONTINUOUS FOOTING? VERIFY AND INDICATE ON THE FOUNDATION PLAN (FOOTING F4 AT THE STAIRS IS OK AS LISTED). 36. SHEET S.1; FOUNDATION PLAN: AT THE STAGE RAMP, INDICATE THE ACTUAL RAMP SLOPE, OR REFERENCE THE ARCHITECT FOR THAT SLOPE. 37. SHEET S.5; SECTION 1: DARKEN THE DIMENSIONS. 38. SHEET S.7; DETAILS 2 AND 3: REFERENCE IS MADE AT THE #4 DOWELS AT 24" O.C. TO 'SEE DETAIL'. PROVIDE THE SPECIFIC DETAIL NUMBER. 39. SHEET S.7; DETAIL 8: ADD A NOTE TO THIS DETAIL TO REFERENCE THE STRUCTURAL NOTES FOR CONTROL JOINT SPACING. 40. SHEET S.7: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE DETAIL 13 DIMENSIONS, DETAIL 17 WELDS, AND DETAIL 21 WELDS. 41. SHEET S.8 (STRUCTURAL NOTES); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 1): REFERENCE IS MADE TO AN ARCHIVED SOIL REPORT FOR THE FOUNDATION DESIGN. PROVIDE THAT REPORT FOR REVIEW. 42. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 11/03/2014 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 11/05/2014 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 11/10/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Demonstrate energy code compliance for the alterations to the building envelope (e.g. new exterior walls and fenestration) based on the current code. Reference: Sections C101.4.3, C101.5, and C103.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. 2. Provide NFRC fenestration product ratings for the U-factor and the SHGC values on COMcheck or use the appropriate default U-factor and SHGC values from Tables C303.1.3 (1) and C303.1.3.(2), IECC 2012. Reference: Section C303.1.3, IECC 2012. 3. Provide guards for equipment located within 10 feet of a roof edge that is elevated more than 30 inches above the adjoining grade (e.g. the new courtyards). Reference: Section 304.11, IMC 2012. |
| 11/10/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Label each section of gas pipe and correct the incorrect labels (one section of pipe is labeled once as 3" and twice as 4"- it should be at least 5" for a load of 2570 CFH at a developed length of 600 feet). Reference: Section 402.4, IFGC 2012. 2. Coordinate riser diagram 3/M8.1 with the plumbing floor plan with regard to the number of lavatories in each restroom. 3. Complete the detail call-out on riser diagram 1/M8.1 and the matching note on the plumbing floor plan on sheet M3.1 that references the continuation of the 4" building drain. 4. Provide a site plan that shows the locations of the water meter, backflow preventer, and the existing building sewer (including its connection to the public sewer). Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 5. Verify that the pipe sizes called out for the flush valves will not result in water velocities greater than that recommended by the pipe manufacturer (e.g. limit the water velocity to less than 8 FPS for copper, PEX, or CPVC piping). At a minimum design flow rate of 25 GPM for a siphonic, flush-valve water closet, a 1" Type L copper pipe has a flow velocity of 9.7 FPS. Reference: Table 604.3, IPC 2012. |
| 11/10/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/13/2014 | SHANAE POWELL | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/13/2014 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |