Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T14CM06666
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/07/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide water supply isometrics. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 2. Clarify why the waterless urinals are being supplied with a 1-1/4" cold water line. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 3. Correct the fixture units used to determine the water demand using the fixture units from Table E103.3 (2), IPC 2012. 4. Correct the size of the fixture drain for the water closet located in room 36 (it appears to be labeled 2" in the waste & vent diagram). Reference: Table 709.1, IPC 2012. 5. Verify the size of the existing building drain at room 17; keynote 1/P1.1 calls it a 4" line but the waste & vent diagram calls it a 3" line. Show the location of the cleanout for this section of the building drain. Reference: Section 708.7, IPC 2012. 6. Provide an appropriately-sized clean out for the 4" building drain that starts in room 29. (Also, clarify the 3" note that appears to be floating in the same area on the waste & vent diagram.) Reference: Section 708.7, IPC 2012. |
| 10/07/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 10/07/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 10/08/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET C1.0; SITE DATA (BUILDING AREA): THIS SHEET LISTS THE BUILDING AREA AS 13,729 G.S.F., WHILE THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT ON THIS SHEET INDICATES 8856 SF. CLARIFY. 2. SHEET D1.0; DEMOLITION KEYNOTES: NOTE 30 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLANS. VERIFY. 3. SHEET A0.0; EXIT REQUIREMENTS: REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE IBC TABLE 1016.1 FOR TRAVEL DISTANCE. REVISE THE REFERENCE NUMBER. 4. SHEET A0.0; EXIT REQUIREMENTS: REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE MAXIMUM DEAD END CORRIDOR LENGTH AS 20'. REVISE THE MAXIMUM LENGTH PER SECTION 1018.4 (EXCEPTION 2). 5. SHEET A0.0; EGRESS WIDTH: REFERENCE IS MADE TO TABLE 1005.3.2 FOR THE EGRESS WIDTH CALCULATION. REVISE THE REFERENCE NUMBER. 6. SHEET A0.0 (EXIT REQUIREMENTS); SHEET A2.1 (DIMENSIONED PLAN): THE MINIMUM CORRIDOR WIDTH LISTED ON SHEET A0.0 IS 72". THE CORRIDOR WIDTH INDICATED ON SHEET A2.1 AT THE NURSE DOSING AREA DOES NOT MEET THAT CRITERIA. CLARIFY. 7. SHEET A2.2; REFLECTED CEILING PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTE 12 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 8. SHEET A3.0; NORTH ELEVATION: A NOTE 8 TYP. IS INDICATED ABOVE THE ROOF. REVISE. 9. SHEET A3.0; WEST ELEVATION: IS NOTE 15 CORRECT IN THE LOCATION IT IS SHOWN? VERIFY. 10. SHEET A3.0; ELEVATION KEYNOTES: NOTES 17 AND 20 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE ELEVATIONS. VERIFY. 11. SHEET A3.1; SECTION 2: REFERENCE IS MADE TO AN ENLARGED DETAIL 6/A3.3 (BETWEEN THE LOBBY AND RESTROOM). REVISE THE REFERENCE DETAIL NUMBER. 12. SHEET A3.1; SECTION 1: KEYNOTE 3 IS REFEENCED AT THE END OF THE DOSING HALLWAY (IN A WINDOW), BUT THE NOTE IS MISSING IN THE KEYNOTES LIST. CLARIFY. 13. SHEET A3.1; SECTION KEYNOTES: NOTES 8, 9, 10, 33, AND 34 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE SECTIONS. VERIFY. 14. SHEET A3.2; KEYNOTES: NOTE 20 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE ELEVATION. VERIFY. 15. SHEET A3.4; KEYNOTE 9: PROVIDE THE BOLT SIZE, SPACING, AND EMBEDMENT LENGTH. 16. SHEET A5.1: DARKEN THE DETAILS VERBIAGE. 17. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 10/09/2014 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 10/13/2014 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Fix all of Building plan review corrections: Fire had same concerns.-kenb |