Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T14CM06656
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/06/2014 | AROMERO4 | WWM | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 10/07/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 10/08/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The Watts model Cu7 double check valve is an obsolete product and does not have an ASSE listing. Provide a backflow protection device that is listed for the intended application. All beverage dispensers require the use of a backflow protection devise listed to ASSE 1022. Reference: Section 608.1, IPC 2012. 2. Provide cleanouts for the 3" horizontal drains located downstream of the second floor sink in the north combination waste and vent system and the combination waste and vent system west of the meat & fish department; the cleanouts shall be sized per Section 708.7, IPC 2012. Reference: Section 708.3.1, IPC 2012. |
| 10/09/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Show that the outlet of the fans serving hoods 1 and 2 comply with the requirements of Section 506.3.13.3, IMC 2012 (i.e. minimum of 5-feet from a property line). 2. Clarify (correct?) the note on roof plan 1/M1 calling for a transition from the fan DTR to an 8" duct down to the hood connection. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 3. A note on sheet M1 allows 3" of clearance to "limited combustible construction"; the IMC does not recognize that term. Revise the note to comply with the requirements of Section 506.3.11, IMC 2012. 4. Provide calculations to show that condensation will not form on the surface of the uninsulated supply ducts. Reference: Section 603.12, IMC 2012. |
| 10/09/2014 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Please fix exiting as it is not allowed through a storage room |
| 10/17/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET A1; SCOPE: THE SCOPE IS LISTED AS A 'TENANT IMPROVEMENT FOR SPACE IN EXISTING SHELL'. IS THIS THE FIRST TENANT IN THE SPACE, OR HAVE THERE BEEN PREVIOUS TENANTS? VERIFY. 2. SHEET A1; LIFE SAFETY PLAN: IN THE EXISTING COURTYARD, AN OCCUPANCY LOAD OF 77 IS INDICATED AT THE EXIT, AND AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 69 IS INDICATED AT THE WEST EXITS. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON THIS SHEET INDICATING THE EXIT WIDTH REQUIRED AND REFERENCE THE IBC SECTION 1005.3.2. 3. SHEET A1; LIFE SAFETY PLAN: THE IBC SECTION 1008.1.8 INDICATES THE SPACE BETWEEN TWO DOORS IN A SERIES SHALL BE 48" MINIMUM. ADDRESS THE WEST EXIT DOORS COMPLIANCE WITH THIS REQUIREMENT. 4. SHEET A1; KEYNOTES DEMOLITION PLAN: NOTE 6 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 5. SHEET A2; FLOOR PLAN: THE IBC SECTION 1014.2 (4) EXCEPTION 2 INDICATES FOUR CIRTERIA FOR MEANS OF EGRESS THROUGH STOCKROOMS IN A GROUP M SPACE. THE FOURTH EXCEPTION INDICATES A DEMARCATED, MINIMUM 44" WIDE AISLE. THE AISLE ON THE PLAN INDICATES ONLY A 3'-0" WIDTH. REVISE. 6. SHEET A2; FLOOR PLAN: INTERIOR ELEVATION INDICATORS IN THE KITCHEN AND MEAT/FISH DEPARTMENT REFERENCE SHEET A8. REVISE THAT SHEET REFERENCE. 7. SHEET A2; KEYNOTES: AT THE WEST END OF THE BUILDING NEAR THE CURVED BLOCK WALLS, NOTE 4 IS INDICATED. REVISE THE NOTE REFERENCE. 8. SHEET A2; KEYNOTES: NOTES 24, 30, AND 40 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 9. SHEET A2; FLOOR PLAN: THE IBC TABLE 2902.1 INDICATES DRINKING FOUNTAINS (SINGLE POINT-OF-USE OR HIGH/LOW) ARE REQUIRED. ARE THOSE SHOWN ON THE PLANS? VERIFY. 10. SHEET A2; KEYNOTE 31: KEYNOTE 31 INDICATES EXTENDING A DOUBLE STUD IN THE ENDS OF A WALL TO A NEW FOOTING BELOW AND TO REFERENCE STRUCTURAL FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. DOES THIS SHOW UP ON THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS (PLAN OR DETAIL)? INDICATE A NEW FOOTING ON SHEET S2.0 AS REQUIRED AT THESE WALLS, AND PROVIDE DETAILS AS REQUIRED. 11. SHEET A2; KEYNOTE 16: KEYNOTE 16 INDICATES A NEW WOOD STAIR PER STRUCTURAL. NO NOTES, PLANS, OR DETAILS WERE FOUND ON THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. COORDINATE AND PROVIDE INFORMATION AS REQUIRED. 12. SHEET A4; CLOUD DETAIL 3: PROVIDE THE CHANNEL SIZE ON THIS DETAIL, AND REFERENCE STRUCTURAL SHEET S3.0 (FRAMING PLAN NOTE 11) FOR SUPPORT OF THE CLOUD FRAMING. 13. SHEET A4; PLANS 1 AND 2: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE SECTION CUTS. 14. SHEET A4; DETAIL 6: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE VERBIAGE. 15. SHEET A4; KEYNOTES: NOTE 6 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLANS. VERIFY. 16. SHEET A5: DARKEN THE DIMENSIONS ON THE SECTIONS AND DETAILS. 17. SHEET A5; KEYNOTES: NOTE 19 REFERENCES THE WOOD RAMP TO THE STRUCTURAL. WHERE IS THAT DETAIL SPECIFICALLY SHOWN? CLARIFY. 18. SHEET A6; KEYNOTES: NOTE 2 INDICATES FOUR MECHANICAL UNITS, BUT THE ROOF PLAN REFERENCES NOTE 2 IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS. CLARIFY. 19. SHEET A6; ROOF PLAN: THE ROOF PLAN INDICATES SEVERAL LOCATIONS WITH A KEYNOTE 2 (TYP.). SHOULD THESE REFERENCE DETAIL 3? VERIFY. 20. SHEET A6; KEYNOTES: NOTE 7 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 21. SHEET S3.0; FRAMING PLAN NOTES: IN NOTE 11, PROVIDE THE SPECIFIC DETAIL NUMBER, AND REFERENCE THE ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL 3/A4 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 22. SHEET S3.0; FRAMING PLAN NOTES: IN NOTE 12, PROVIDE THE SPECIFIC DETAIL NUMBER. 23. SHEET S3.0 (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 5): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A DB2 (ABOVE). DOES THIS BEAM SHOW UP ON A PLAN OR DETAIL? IS THIS THE BEAM INDICATED IN DETAIL 114? VERIFY. 24. SHEET S3.0; FRAMING PLAN: DETAI 502 IS CUT JUST NORTH OF THE SPIRAL STAIR. IS THIS THE CORRECT LOCATION FOR THAT DETAIL (STEEL BEAM TO STEEL BEAM)? VERIFY. 25. SHEET S3.0; FRAMING PLAN: DETAIL 513 IS CUT AT GRIDS 2 AND I. THE DETAIL DOES NOT INDICATE THE BEAM (W12X26) SUPPORTED AT THE COLUMN. VERIFY. 26. SHEET S3.0; FRAMING PLAN: DETAIL 504 IS CUT AT GRIDS 1.5 AND J, AND AT GRIDS 4.5 AND J. THE DETAIL DOES NOT INDICATE THE WOOD BEAM SUPPORTED AT THE COLUMN. VERIFY. 27. SHEET S4.0; DETAIL 506: REFERENCE DETAIL 2/A5 ON DETAIL 506 FOR THE RAILING CONNECTION. 28. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 10/21/2014 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD Zoning Review Transmittal TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: T14CM06656 11 S. 6th Avenue TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 21, 2014 Proposed Project: Façade Renovation & Interior Remodel COMMENTS: Historic & DRB required for façade renovation. Once the above reviews are complete provide the case numbers, date of approval, any conditions of approval on the plan If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov (520) 837-4956 |
| 10/27/2014 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Plan review has been completed and the following corrections are required. Please provide a written response to comments with plan re-submittal. 1) Provide accurate 2012 IECC lighting compliance information. The luminaire counts in the ComCheck do not match the actual # of fixtures (F1, F3, F6). Additionally if your intent is to use the space-by-space method for determining interior lighting allowances (indicated by starting at 1.6 w/f instead of 1.4) then break out the separate space allowances for the scullery, storage, food prep, etc. In order to add the extra wattage allowances per section C405.5.2(2) (a) you will need to provide switching information. If there are questions regarding this review contact: LeeRay 520-837-4906 LeeRay.Hanly@tucsonaz.gov |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/12/2014 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |
| 10/28/2014 | CPIERCE1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |