Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - - 1ST
Permit Number - T14CM06525
Review Name: REVISION - - 1ST
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/19/2015 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: May 11, 2015 SUBJECT: Remodel- Engineering Review TO: Kittle Design and Construction; Attn: Susan Kittle, RA LOCATION: 2020 E 13th St REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T14CM06525 (R1) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed revision to the approved Tenant Improvement. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the revision at this time. This review falls under the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administration Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Refer to the following link for further clarification: http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN: 1) AM Sec.2-06: Due to the numerous site changes on this plan set versus the last approved site plan a development plan package maybe required for review and approval through all necessary PDSD Sections. The last approved building plan was for a tenant improvement with a parking restripe to match the last approved plan in Records; however per this site plan revision there are numerous changes to the site that may warrant a development plan package review. Confirmation through the Zoning Section will determine if a DP activity is required. At a minimum Zoning will have to review the building plan revision due to the pedestrian access change, bicycle parking change, removal of the auxiliary building, etc. 2) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.G: Revise the plan set to remove Keynote #10 and the outline of the auxiliary building. Per field visit the building is no longer onsite and must be accurately depicted on the plan set. 3) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Per field visit it appears that the handicap parking space does not meet the maximum cross slope of 2% in all directions. Field verification showed that the longitudinal slope exceeds the maximum 2%. The parking space will need to be revised so that all handicap requirements have been meet. 4) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Per field visit it appears that the required wheel stops have not been installed at the parking spaces as required for the 2.5 foot overhang to prevent vehicles from encroaching into the pedestrian access. 5) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.d: Revise the plan set to correctly show the bicycle parking location (will need to get final approval from the Zoning Section for the revision), per field visit it appears that the bicycle parking location is now located along the front of the building and not the back. The plan set needs to be revised to reflect. 6) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.2: Revise the plan set and Keynote #10 to provide an associated details to label the required rock rip rap sizing, method of placement, minimum filter fabric specifications or provide a reference to PC/COT Standard Specification for Public Improvements Section 1014. The plan is to be used as the construction document and must accurately label and detail all improvements for construction purposes. Per field investigation it appeared that filter fabric was not installed under the rock rip rap which could cause maintenance issues in the future with ponding water that does not meet the maximum drain down time of 12 hours. 7) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.2: Revise the plan set to provide a detail for the pipe outlet into the basin. Verify pipe sizing and the outlet structure (to include a discussion on the soccer ball bubbler outlet). The outlet will have to be revised based on sound civil engineering as needed in the required drainage statement. 8) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the plan to label and dimension all areas of the required pedestrian circulation throughout the development. Per TSM Section 7-01.3.3.B within all development, a continuous pedestrian circulation path is required from all access doors. Per field visit it appears that the sidewalk along the backside of the building needs to continue to the access door along the west side. It is acknowledged that the auxiliary building is no longer onsite so the pedestrian access is not required, revise the plan to accurately reflect the required versus removed sidewalk locations. DRAINAGE STATEMENT: 9) TSM Sec.4-04.2.3.2.D: Provide a Drainage Statement with a discussion along with applicable hydraulic calculation sheets for all proposed drainage infrastructure. The discussion should address the proposed retention basin located in the southwest corner of the site; pipe sizing calculations for the roof drain pipe and PVC storm drain; and pipe outlet into the basin (to include a discussion on the soccer ball bubbler outlet). GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised site/building plan and Drainage Statement that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/28/2015 | CPIERCE1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 05/28/2015 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |