Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

PRO is currently experiencing an outage. Some documents and records may not be available on PRO momentarily. We apologize for the inconvenience and are working to restore full access.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T14CM06498
Parcel: 10511061R

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL

Permit Number - T14CM06498
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/31/2014 LEERAY HANLY ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
11/03/2014 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. PREVIOUS COMMENT 5; SHEET A0.01; CODE ANALYSIS CHAPTER 10 (COMMON PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL): THE DRAWINGS INDICATE THE LONGEST COMMON PATH OF TRAVEL IN THE BUILDING IS 100'-0", WHILE THE IBC TABLE 1014.3 INDICATES 75' IS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED ("ALL OTHERS" OCCUPANCY). ADDRESS THIS ISSUE.
2. PREVIOUS NOTE 13; SHEET A1.40: KEYED NOTE 22 REFERENCES A SIGN AT THE ELECTRICAL ROOM. THAT ROOM (AND NOTE 22) ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS SHEET. CLARIFY.
3. PREVIOUS NOTE 14; SHEETS A1.42 AND A1.43: BOTH SHEETS CONTAIN VERBIAGE AND NUMBERS THAT STILL DO NOT MEET THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIREMENTS OF A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT (UPPER AND LOWER CASE). REVISE.
4. PREVIOUS NOTE 15; SHEET A1.46: THIS SHEET CONTAINS VERBIAGE AND NUMBERS THAT STILL DO NOT MEET THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIREMENTS OF A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT (UPPER AND LOWER CASE). REVISE.
5. SHEET A3.10; DETAIL 07: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE VERBIAGE.
6. PREVIOUS COMMENT 16; SHEET A4.01 (DETAILS 08 AND 09): AT THE METAL STUD BRACES, THE SIZE AND QUANTITY OF CONNECTORS AT THE VERTICAL STUDS WERE NOT PROVIDED. IN ADDITION, A DETAIL OF THE BRACE CONNECTION TO THE EXISTING STRUCTURE ABOVE WAS NOT INCLUDED.
7. PREVIOUS COMMENT 18; SHEET A4.11 (DETAILS 04, 05, 09, AND 11): AT THE METAL STUD BRACES, THE SIZE AND QUANTITY OF CONNECTORS AT THE VERTICAL STUDS WERE NOT PROVIDED. IN ADDITION, A DETAIL OF THE BRACE CONNECTION TO THE EXISTING STRUCTURE ABOVE WAS NOT INCLUDED.
8. SHEET S-101; ELEVATION 4: A BOXED NOTE INDICATES TO REFERENCE THE ARCHITECT FOR GATE DETAILS. THOSE DETAILS WERE NOT LOCATED. COORDINATE WITH THE ARCHITECT.
9. SHEET S-101 (SECTION 2); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (CMU6): THE WALL FOOTING IN THE CALCULATIONS INDICATES A 16" THICKNESS, WHILE THE SECTION INDICATES A 1'-3" FOOTING THICKNESS. CLARIFY.
10. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
11/06/2014 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
11/06/2014 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Comment not resolved; the minimum font height is 3/32" for all of the characters, even the lower case characters. See M-2 and M-4. [Initial comment: Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum height of 3/32-inch (i.e. both upper and lower case fonts must be at least 3/32" high). Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.]

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/14/2014 SHANAE POWELL OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
11/14/2014 FERNE RODRIGUEZ REJECT SHELF Completed