Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T14CM06131
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/22/2014 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/23/2014 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Development Package must be approved first. |
| 09/29/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET A0.2; HARDSCAPE KEYNOTES: NOTE 7 INDICATES 'NOT USED', BUT IT SHOWS UP ON THE PLAN (THREE LOCATIONS) ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING. CLARIFY. 2. SHEET A0.2; HARDSCAPE KEYNOTES: IS NOTE 6 (IN FOUR LOCATIONS) ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING CORRECT AT THOSE LOCATIONS? VERIFY. 3. SHEET A0.2; HARDSCAPE KEYNOTES: NOTES 3, 4, 10, 14, AND 29 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 4. SHEET A0.2; HARDSCAPE DEMOLITION KEYNOTES: NOTES 01, 53, 61, 62, 63, 64, AND 71 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 5. SHEET A0.3; DETAIL 12: NOTE 6 REFERENCES A STEEL ANGLE. PROVIDE ON THE DETAIL THE ANGLE WALL THICKNESS, OR ADD A REFERENCE. 6. SHEET A0.3; DETAIL 12: NOTE 7 REFERENCES METAL B DECK. PROVIDE ON THE DETAIL THE DECK GAUGE, OR ADD A REFERENCE. 7. SHEET A0.3; DETAIL 15: NOTE 1 REFERENCES METAL B DECK. PROVIDE ON THE DETAIL THE DECK GAUGE, OR ADD A REFERENCE. 8. SHEET A0.4; PLAN 01: NOTE 2 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN OR SECTIONS. VERIFY. 9. SHEET A0.4; SECTION 04: A SECTION CUT THROUGH AN OPENING (NOTE 8) REFERENCES 6/A0.3. REVISE THE SECTION REFERENCE. 10. SHEET A0.4; SECTION 04: FINISH THE SECTION REFERENCE AT THE WALL OPENING ON THE RIGHT. 11. SHEET A0.4; SECTION 05: REVISE THE NOTE NUMBER (5) AT THE DOCK SLAB. 12. SHEET A0.4; SECTION 06: NOTE 7 REFERENCES A BENT METAL PLATE. PROVIDE THE PLATE THICKNESS, OR ADD A REFERENCE. 13. SHEET A0.4; SECTION 09: REVISE THE KEYNOTE NUMBERS FROM ONE TO ELEVEN AT THE GUARDRAIL. 14. SHEET A0.4; SECTION 10: KEYNOTE 1 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE SECTION. VERIFY. 15. SHEET A1.0; AREA OF REFUGE DETAILS: ARE THE AREA FOR TEMPORARY REFUGE PLAN AND ELEVATION PERTINENT TO THIS PROJECT? VERIFY. 16. SHEET A1.0 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A3.0 (SECTION B): REVERSE THE DIRECTION THAT THE SECTION IS CUT ON THE PLAN. 17. SHEET A1.0; FLOOR PLAN: AN INTERIOR ELEVATION AT THE NORTH WALL REFERENCES 3/C4. SHOULD THIS BE 3/A3.2? VERIFY. 18. SHEET A1.0; FLOOR PLAN: AN INTERIOR ELEVATION AT THE EAST WALL REFERENCES 3/A3.2. SHOULD THIS BE 4/A3.2? VERIFY. 19. SHEET A1.0; FLOOR PLAN: SEVERAL DOOR JAMBS ON THE NORTH WALL REFERENCE A DETAIL 2A/A3.2. REVISE THE REFERENCE. 20. SHEET A1.0; FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES (ABBREVIATIONS): CLEAR UP THE LAST ABBREVIATION. 21. SHEET A1.0 (FLOOR PLAN); FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES: BETWEEN GRIDS D AND E, AND NORTH OF GRID 4, A NOTE REFERENCES 15 AT THE SERVICE SINK. ADD THIS TO THE KEYNOTE LIST. 22. SHEET A1.0; FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTE 55 REFERENCES SHEET A1.4 FOR THE TRUCK DOCK. REVISE THE SHEET REFERENCE. 23. SHEET A1.0; FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTE 61 REFERENCES SHEET A1.4 FOR THE CONCRETE DOCK. REVISE THE SHEET REFERENCE. 24. SHEET A1.0; FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTE 42 HAS A DETAIL REFERENCE.THAT IS UNFINISHED. COMPLETE THE REFERENCE. 25. SHEET A1.0; FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTES 23, 25, 31, 42, 43, AND 53 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 26. SHEETS A1.1, A1.2, AND A1.3; AREA OF REFUGE DETAILS: ARE THE AREA FOR TEMPORARY REFUGE PLAN AND ELEVATION PERTINENT TO THIS PROJECT? VERIFY. 27. SHEET A1.3; ROOF PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTE 21 HAS A DETAIL REFERENCE THAT IS UNFINISHED. COMPLETE THE REFERENCE. 28. SHEET A1.3; ROOF PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTE 24 REFERENCES A DETAIL 04/A8.5. REVISE THE DETAIL REFERENCE. 29. SHEET A1.3; ROOF PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTE 22 HAS TWO DETAIL REFERENCES THAT ARE UNFINISHED. COMPLETE THE REFERENCES. 30. SHEET A1.3; ROOF PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTE 23 HAS A DETAIL REFERENCE THAT IS UNFINISHED. COMPLETE THE REFERENCE. 31. SHEET A1.3; ROOF PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTE 31 REFERENCES A DETAIL 1/A8.0. REVISE THE DETAIL REFERENCE. 32. SHEET A1.3; ROOF PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTE 31 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 33. SHEET A2.0; SOUTH ELEVATION E: WHERE IS THIS ELEVATION INDICATED ON THE PLAN? VERIFY. 34. SHEET A2.0; ELEVATION KEYNOTES: NOTE 7 HAS A DETAIL REFERENCE THAT IS UNFINISHED. COMPLETE THE REFERENCE. 35. SHEET A2.0; ELEVATION KEYNOTES: NOTE 5 HAS A DETAIL REFERENCE THAT IS UNFINISHED. COMPLETE THE REFERENCE. 36. SHEET A2.0; ELEVATION KEYNOTES: NOTE 4 HAS A DETAIL REFERENCE THAT IS UNFINISHED. COMPLETE THE REFERENCE. 37. SHEET A2.0; ELEVATION KEYNOTES: NOTE 23 HAS A DETAIL REFERENCE THAT IS UNFINISHED. COMPLETE THE REFERENCE. 38. SHEET A2.0; ELEVATION KEYNOTES: NOTE 50 HAS A REFERENCE THAT IS UNFINISHED. COMPLETE THE REFERENCE. 39. SHEET A2.0; ELEVATION KEYNOTES: NOTE 22 HAS A DETAIL REFERENCE THAT IS UNFINISHED. COMPLETE THE REFERENCE. 40. SHEET A2.0; ELEVATION KEYNOTES: NOTE 21 HAS A DETAIL REFERENCE THAT IS UNFINISHED. COMPLETE THE REFERENCE. 41. SHEET A2.0; ELEVATION KEYNOTES: NOTE 48 HAS A DETAIL REFERENCE THAT IS UNFINISHED. COMPLETE THE REFERENCE. 42. SHEET A2.0; ELEVATION KEYNOTES: NOTES 24 AND 25 HAVE DETAIL REFERENCES THAT ARE UNFINISHED. COMPLETE THE REFERENCES. 43. SHEET A2.0; ELEVATION KEYNOTES: NOTES 24 AND 25 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE ELEVATIONS. VERIFY. 44. SHEET A3.0; SECTION KEYNOTES: NOTES 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 52, 53, 54, 61, 62, 65, AND 66 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE SECTIONS. VERIFY. 45. SHEET A3.2; REST ROOM ELEVATIONS: THE KEYNOTES ON THE ELEVATIONS ARE VERY HARD TO READ. REVISE AND ENSURE ALL NOTES LISTED ARE SHOWN ON THE ELEVATIONS. 46. SHEET A3.3; DETAIL 5: ARE THE AREA FOR TEMPORARY REFUGE PLAN AND ELEVATION PERTINENT TO THIS PROJECT? VERIFY. 47. SHEET S0.1 (GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 1): IT IS INDICATED THAT THE CALCULATIONS USED A SOILS REPORT FOR THE FOUNDATION DESIGN. PROVIDE THAT REPORT FOR REVIEW. 48. SHEET S2.1 (FOUNDATION PLAN); SHEET A1.0 (FLOOR PLAN): REVISE THE GRID LINES DENOTED E.4 AND E.6 ON S2.1 TO MATCH THE GRID LINES ON A1.0. 49. SHEET S2.1; FOUNDATION PLAN NOTES: NOTES 5, 6, 7, AND 11 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 50. SHEET S3.1 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 2): THE BEAM B1 (TWO LOCATIONS) AT THE FRONT CANOPY IS NOT DESIGNED IN THE CALCULATIONS. PROVIDE. 51. SHEET S3.1; FRAMING PLAN NOTES: NOTE 6 HAS A DETAIL REFERENCE THAT IS UNFINISHED. COMPLETE THE REFERENCE. 52. SHEET S3.1; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: PLAN NOTE 13 IS INDICATED NORTH OF GRID 2 AND EAST OF GRID B. IS THIS NOTE CORRECT AT THAT LOCATION? VERIFY. 53. SHEET S4.1; DETAIL 117: THIS DETAIL IS NOT CUT ON THE FOUNDATION PLAN. VERIFY. 54. SHEET S5.1; DETAIL 212: IS THE SECTION X A PLAN VIEW AS INDICATED (STEEL ANGLE ON ONE SIDE ONLY)? VERIFY. 55. SHEET S5.1; DETAIL 207: LOWER THE STEEL ANGLE LEDGER. 56. SHEET S5.2: THERE ARE TWO DETAILS MARKED 225. REVISE. 57. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 09/30/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide a site drawing showing the size and route of the building water supply along with the location and size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly; the size, route, and slope of the building sewer, the location of all cleanouts in the building sewer, and the location of the connection of the building sewer to the public sewer. An approved development plan is not a substitute for a building permit to install site utilities. Reference: Sections 104.2 and 107.1, IBC 2012. 2. Provide a design for the mounting shelf for the water heater along with structural calculations to show that the water heater is safely supported. Reference: Section 301.2, IPC 2012. 3. The specified thermostatic mixing valve appears to be an obsolete product. Provide tempered water for the lavatories in restrooms using approved devices conforming to ASSE 1070. Reference: Sections 416.5 and 607.1.2, IPC 2012. 4. Automatic faucets, dispensing a maximum of 0.25 gallons per metering cycle, are required for the lavatories. Specify the time out setting for the faucets. Reference: Section 416.6, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 5. Verify that the pipe sizes called out for the flush valves will not result in water velocities greater than that recommended by the pipe manufacturer (e.g. limit the water velocity to less than 8 FPS for copper, piping). At a minimum design flow rate of 25 GPM for a siphonic, flush-valve water closet, a 1" Type L copper pipe has a flow velocity of 9.7 FPS; a urinal, with a minimum design flow rate of 12 GPM, a ½" Type L copper pipe has a velocity of 16.5 FPS. Reference: Table 604.3, IPC 2012. 6. The controlling code for gas piping is the 2012 International Fuel Gas Code. 7. Clarify the design basis of the natural gas piping system. The notes show two different maximum developed lengths (280' and 360') while the pipe length notations on the gas piping schematic show a maximum developed length of 322-feet. In addition, the gas piping schematic indicates a total connected load of 1120 CFH but plumbing note #3 calls for a total capacity of 1940 CFM (CFH?). Reference: Section 402.1, IFGC 2012. 8. The gas piping schematic shows a 2" pipe supplying 600 CFH of gas with a developed length of 350-feet (Table 402.4 (2), IFGC 2012). If these are the correct conditions, revise the pipe size. Reference: Sections 402.1 and 402.3, IFGC 2012. 9. Revise the location of the sediment traps for the roof top HVAC units (detail 06/P2) to be downstream of the appliance shut off valve, as close to the equipment as possible. Reference: Section 408.4, IFGC 2012. 10. Revise the detail call-outs on sheet P1 that refer to sheet P3 to indicate the correct location of the details. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. |
| 09/30/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 10/01/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Tucson. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections C103.2, C401.2, and C406.1, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. 2. Show that the mechanical systems for the building comply with the current energy code (e.g. provide the COMcheck Mechanical Compliance Certificate). Reference: Sections C103.2 and C403.1, IECC 2012. 3. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012. 4. Provide notes on the drawings indicating what provisions have been made for commissioning the mechanical building systems per Section C408.2, IECC 2012. 5. Clarify the balancing data for EF-3. The mechanical floor plan shows 200 CFM of exhaust for each restroom but the exhaust fan is scheduled for only 300 CFM. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 6. The janitor's room appears to be occupiable and contains an indirect waste receptor (the service sink, see Section 802.3, IPC 2012). Explain why the room has no ventilation. Reference: Section 401.1, IMC 2012. 7. Clarify the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust fan, EF-3. On sheet M1 it is scheduled both as being controlled by a wall switch and with being interlocked with the restroom lights. On sheet E1.1, keynote 30 and detail 03/E1.1 indicate that EF-3 is controlled by occupancy sensors for the two restrooms and the janitor's room (note that the janitor's room is not served by EF-3). The restrooms are each continuously supplied with 150 CFM during operating hours which means that the exhaust fan must operate on the same schedule so that all of the air supplied to the restrooms will be exhausted. Reference: Section 403.2.1 (4), IMC 2012. 8. Clarify the sequence of operation for exhaust fans EF-1 and EF-5. Both provide exhaust for dressing rooms but EF-1 is "on with lights" and EF-5 is controlled by a wall switch. Coordinate with the electrical power plan. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. |
| 10/02/2014 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Plan review has been completed and the following corrections are required. Please provide a written response to comments with plan re-submittal. 1) Provide 2012 City of Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code information. Note that the 2012 OLC does not exempt you from providing information solely because you are modifying less than 10% of the site lighting. Because the contributory lumens in this project are less than the existing lumens PDSD will forgo the requirement that you provide a complete inventory of the site but: A) Provide cut sheets for all exterior luminaires specifying model #'s. The model is to be specified to clarify that the color temperature will be less than 3500K. B) provide cut sheet for can-lights under canopy. C) Modify OLC notes on pp ES.1 to reflect that 1) contributing lumens from pole lights will be reduced, and 2) all other new exterior lighting is full cut-off under canopy and therefore exempt from lumen calculations. If there are questions regarding this review contact: LeeRay 520-837-4906 LeeRay.Hanly@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/14/2014 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/29/2014 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |